Tag

Eases

Browsing


The central bank’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) cut rates a third and final time in 2025, reducing the target range for the federal funds rate by 25 basis points to a 3.5% to 3.75% range. This reduction will help reduce financing costs of builder and developer loans.

Furthermore, and explicitly noted by Fed Chair Powell as separate from policy considerations, to maintain an appropriate level of reserves as a means of monetary policy implementation and to enable smooth market functioning, the Fed will initiate purchases of short-term Treasury securities on December 12th.

The tone of today’s meeting was more dovish than investors expected. Overall, the Fed faces a complicated outlook with risks on both sides of its dual mandate: supporting the labor market and maintaining stable prices. Interest rate-sensitive sectors such as housing continue to face restrictive conditions. The slightly dovish stance of today’s announcement suggests the FOMC perceives greater near-term downside risk for the labor market component of its mandate, despite an improving outlook for GDP growth.

There was a notable level of dissent at the December meeting. Two voting members of the FOMC (Goolsbee and Schmid) preferred no change to the target rate. In contrast, Governor Miran supported a 50-basis-point reduction. This marks the largest level of dissent since September 2019.

The Fed’s statement noted that job gains have slowed, and the unemployment rate has edged higher through September. In contrast to recent policy statements, the Fed did not note unemployment as “low.”  The slowing of the labor market is due to both a decline in immigration and a pullback in hiring by firms. The December view of the economy was somewhat obscured by missing or delayed government data due to the now-ended government shutdown.

Chair Powell noted in his press conference that activity in the housing sector remains “weak.” Powell also noted that supply remains low, and homeowners remain locked-in due to low-rate mortgages. Finally, the Fed Chair indicated that the U.S. has not built enough housing, leading to affordability challenges due to a structural housing shortage.

Chair Powell also noted that inflation has been lowered but remains “elevated,” because of recent monetary policy actions. Inflation expectations have declined, and long-term expectations remain anchored to the central bank’s 2% target.

This framing of the economic situation is consistent with the December rate cut as being an insurance policy of easing given weakening of the labor market due to policy uncertainty and tariffs. That is, the Fed’s cut biases policy to responding to future weakening of economic growth rather than to concerns about inflation reaccelerating (some FOMC members have argued, for example, that markets can look through any tariff effects, which will be one-off impacts).

Looking forward, the Fed’s outlook for the economy and monetary policy is mixed. Estimates from the central bank’s Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) indicate an expectation of stronger economic growth next year, with a 2026 2.3% fourth quarter year-over-year growth rate. This is an upward revision compared to the 1.8% estimate from September. The SEP estimates also reveal an expectation of a 4.4% unemployment rate in 2026 and decline for inflation (core PCE) of 2.4%, relative to 2.9% in 2025. The revised SEP does not anticipate the economy reaching the Fed’s target inflation rate of 2% until 2028.

With respect to policy, the SEP outlook suggests one rate cut in 2026 and one final rate cut in 2027. The “dot plot” of individual responses suggests one respondent, presumably Governor Miran, foresees approximately five rate cuts in 2026. The policy outlook is clouded by the fact that the Fed will have new leadership next year, with a new Chair taking office in May 2026.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


The cost of credit for residential Land Acquisition, Development & Construction (AD&C) eased in the first quarter of 2025, according to NAHB’s survey on AD&C Financing. During the quarter, the average contract interest rate declined on three of the four categories of loans tracked in the NAHB survey: from 8.48% in 2024 Q4 to 8.23% on loans for land acquisition, from 8.28% to 7.86% on loans for land development, and from 8.34% to 8.08% on loans for speculative single-family construction. The average rate on loans for pre-sold single-family construction meanwhile bucked the trend, increasing from 7.75% to 7.96%.

In addition to interest, lenders also typically charge initial points on the loans. The points can affect credit costs as much as the interest rate—especially for loans paid off as quickly as most of those for single-family construction. In the first quarter of 2025, average points declined from 0.75% to 0.74% on loans for land development, and from 0.67% to 0.45% on loans for pre-sold single-family construction; but increased from 0.55% to 0.71% on loans for land acquisition, and from 0.64% to 0.68% on loans for speculative single-family construction.

The change in points was sufficient to offset the increase in interest rates on loans for pre-sold single-family construction, but not the reduction in rates on the other three categories of AD&C loans. As a result, the average effective interest rate (calculated taking both the contract rate and initial points into account) declined in all four cases: from 10.79% to 10.68% on loans for land acquisition, from 12.12% to 11.50% on loans for land development, from 12.86% to 12.59% on loans for speculative single-family construction, and from 12.98% to 12.49% on loans for pre-sold single-family construction.

Except for what now looks like a temporary reversal for construction loans in 2024 Q4, the average effective rate on AD&C loans has been trending downward for about a year. This stands in contrast to the average rate on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages, which has levelled off and even started to edge up again after coming off its 2023 peak.

While the cost of AD&C credit was declining, the NAHB survey shows that lending standards on AD&C loans were still tightening in the first quarter, although the reports of tightening were less widespread than they had been at any other time over the past three years. The net easing index derived from the survey posted a 2025 Q1 reading of -10.0 (the negative numbers indicating that net credit had become tighter since the previous quarter). This is the closest the NAHB index has come to hitting the break-even point of zero since the first quarter of 2022.

At the same time, the similar net easing index derived from the Federal Reserve’s survey of senior loan officers posted a 2025 Q1 reading of -11.1. This is down slightly from the previous quarter, but still ranks as the second highest reading for the Fed index since the first quarter of 2022. The Fed survey of lenders and the NAHB survey of builders and developers have been telling very similar stories recently, especially over the past five quarters. More details from the Fed’s survey of lenders—including measures of demand and net easing for residential mortgages—are discussed in a previous post.

Perhaps surprisingly, given the above results on declining credit costs, raising interest rates (cited by 57% of builders and developers who reported that availability of credit had worsened in the first quarter) has displaced lowering the loan-to-value or loan-to-cost ratio (50%) as the number-one way NAHB members say lenders are tightening conditions on AD&C loans. It is important to remember that relatively few NAHB members reported worse credit availability in the first place in 2025 Q1, so these percentages are based on a relatively small sample. Tied for third place, each cited by 43% of builders and developers, are increasing documentation requirements and requiring personal guarantees or collateral not related to the project. Meanwhile, the share of builders and developers who say lenders are reducing the amount they are willing to lend fell to 36%—the lowest percentage for this mode of tightening since 2018.

More detail on credit conditions for residential builders and developers is available on NAHB’s AD&C Financing Survey web page.

Discover more from Eye On Housing

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .

Pin It