Author

realtykast_fmyriy

Browsing


Inflation eased to an eight-month low in January, confirming a continued downward trend. Though most Consumer Price Index (CPI) components have resolved shutdown-related distortions from last fall, the shelter index will remain affected through April due to the imputation method used for housing costs. The shelter index is likely to show larger increases in the coming months.

While headline inflation moderated, underlying cost pressures from trade policy persist. In 2025, the average U.S. tariff rate rose from 2.6% to 13%. A recent New York Fed study found that 94% of tariff costs were passed through to U.S. companies and consumers during the first eight months of 2025. Households still face elevated costs for consumer goods even as the pace of price growth slows.

On a non-seasonally adjusted basis, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose by 2.4% in January compared to the year prior, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) latest report. That was the lowest level since May 2025. Excluding the volatile food and energy components, the “core” CPI increased by 2.5% over the past twelve months. A large portion of the “core” CPI is the housing shelter index, which increased 3.0% over the year. Meanwhile, the component index of food rose by 2.9%, and the energy component index fell by 0.1%.

On a monthly basis, the CPI rose by 0.2% in January (seasonally adjusted), and the “core” CPI increased by 0.3%.

The price index for a broad set of energy sources fell by 1.5% in January, with the increase in natural gas (+1.0%) offset by decreases in fuel oil (-5.7%), gasoline (-3.2%) and electricity (-0.1%). Meanwhile, the food at home index rose by 0.2%, while the food away from home index increased by 0.1% in January.

The index for shelter continued to be the largest contributor to the overall monthly increase in all items index. Other top contributors that rose in January included indexes for airline fares (+6.5%), personal care (+1.2%), recreation (+0.5%), medical care (+0.3%), and communication (+0.5%). Meanwhile, the index for used cars and trucks (-1.8%), household furnishings and operations (-0.1%), and motor vehicle insurance (-0.4%) were among the few major indexes that decreased over the month.

The index for shelter, which makes up more than 40% of the “core” CPI, rose by 0.2% in January. The index for owners’ equivalent rent (OER) and the index for rent of primary residence (RPR) both increased by 0.2% over the month. NAHB constructs a “real” rent index to indicate whether inflation in rents is faster or slower than core inflation. It provides insight into the supply and demand conditions for rental housing. When inflation in rents is rising faster than core inflation, the real rent index rises and vice versa. The real rent index is calculated by dividing the price index for rent by the core CPI (to exclude the volatile food and energy components).

In January, the Real Rent Index remained unchanged. The index has remained virtually flat since August 2025, except for data quality issues in October and November.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


Stuck at one rental property? Maybe you spent years saving for that first down payment, and now, your funds are depleted. Where do you go from here? Not to worry—we’ll show you how to get past this common rookie roadblock and buy your second, third, and fourth deals!

Welcome to another Rookie Reply! Ashley and Tony are back with more questions from the BiggerPockets Forums, the first of which is about scaling when you’re out of cash. Some rookie investors throw their entire savings at that first investment property, so do you really have to start over to buy the next one? Maybe you don’t! We share a few strategies that will help you grow your real estate portfolio faster.

Insurance premiums have risen in many markets, but what do you do when they actually kill your deal, wiping out any potential cash flow? Abandon the deal entirely? Go back and negotiate with the seller? We also hear from an investor who wants to build an Airbnb business and take advantage of the short-term rental tax loophole, but is struggling to pick a market. We’ll help them narrow down their options!

Ashley Kehr:
Today’s rookie reply is a great one because it hits three different fears that rookie investors have when they’re ready to move on from learning into execution.

Tony Robinson:
Yeah, we’ve got someone worried about how to rinse and repeat after their first rental. Another rookie panicking mid deal because insurance blew up their numbers. And a W2 investor trying to use short-term rentals for tax savings without getting crushed by regulations.

Ashley Kehr:
This is the Real Estate Rookie podcast. And I’m Ashley Care.

Tony Robinson:
And I’m Tony j Robinson. And with that, let’s get into today’s first question. So this question comes from the BiggerPockets Forum and it says, after spending four months reading and listening, I’m close to finally taking that first step, enough talk time for execution, but I still find myself questioning what do I do after I purchase my first rental? I’m focused on long-term rentals and cosmetic burrs, but I struggle with grasping creative ways to finance and rinse and repeat. While I’m fine dropping 40, 70 K as a down payment, I feel stuck in a holding pattern wondering if I need to wait and save another 40, 70 K to do the next deal. I’m excited about Cleveland, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, and Dayton. Any nuggets of wisdom would be appreciated. Alright, so this question is really about how to scale your portfolio beyond the capital that you currently have access to.
I think there are maybe a few approaches that you can take. The first approach is to do probably the simplest way is just to take the 40 70 K that you have right now, put that down as a down payment on a deal, and then save up under the 40 70 K and just repeat that process over and over again. It’s slower, but it’s significantly less work and requires less creativity and it’s just a really kind of tried and true approach to build a portfolio. The second path is that you find a way to recycle that initial set of capital. So you can do things like the burrs that you mentioned where you’re buying a property, you’re renovating it, you’re rehabbing it, then you’re refinancing to get back some or potentially all of the capital that you put back into that deal, right? So the burrs strategy is the second way, and then another way is then partnering with other people to help fund your deals.
So if you’ve taken down this first deal, you’ve got a bit of a track record, you’ve proven that you know how to find deals, execute, and so on and so forth, maybe then you start leveraging partners and their capital to take down more deals. And then maybe probably the more complicated path is going after something like more creative financing. If you can do seller financing where you’re finding properties that are owned free and clear and then you’re negotiating directly with the seller to have them loan you the money is another way to scale beyond your original capital. But in my mind, Astros are probably the four big buckets, but curious what your thoughts are.

Ashley Kehr:
Yeah, I think the last part of this question as to should I wait and save up more money or should I go ahead and try and find another creative way to purchase a property without waiting and saving up money? But I think the answer is really to do this simultaneously. Start saving again, but also looking for deals where you can do some creative financing. So whether that’s a bur where you’re using hard money and then you’re going to refinance out of it and pull your money back out, whether it’s going to be finding a deal where the person will do seller financing. If you go to, I think it’s called landwatch.com I think is what it is, you can literally click a toggle or a filter that is for seller finance deals that are available that people are already saying they’ll do seller financing and you can submit offers and put the offer as seller financing.
One thing that I’ve always done is when I get to go face to face with a seller or I try to have my real estate agent communicate this, if I’m going to submit an offer that’s seller financing, I always like to say, have you talked to your accountant or your CPA about the tax advantages of doing seller financing? And that usually piques a little bit of interest and it sounds more reputable to somebody having it come from their own personal CPA rather than from somebody who’s trying to buy their property. If I try and tell them like, oh, here’s all the advantages and the reasons why it’s more likely they’ll listen to their CPA than me who’s trying to haggle them for a deal.

Tony Robinson:
Just last thing I’ll say asra, I do think that there’s value in thinking about deals number two, five and 10 before deal number one, but I think it’s a bit of a fine line because oftentimes I see people get so caught up and well, how do I scale and how do I get property number two and how do I get property number five that they lose focus on the fact that they don’t even have deal number one yet. So I think the majority of your focus right now should be on how do I make deal number one work? And then from there you can start making pivots and adjustments to go on to deal number two, number five, number 10. But don’t get caught in that loop of thinking so far ahead that you forget to take that first step.

Ashley Kehr:
That’s totally a great point. So we’re going to take a quick break, but when we come back, we’re going to understand when you should walk away from a deal or stick it out. We’ll be right back. Okay. Welcome back. So this next question comes from the BiggerPockets forums and it says, hi, I am a new investor to real estate. I’m 22 and looking to do a house hack using an FHA loan with three and a half percent down. I’ve got under contract on a property in Baytown, Texas, but during underwriting we found insurance costs were 6,000 to 8,000 per year plus flood insurance. The deal no longer cash flows even long-term, and I’m past my option fee. I feel stupid backing out but don’t know what to do. Is my earnest money gone? Please help. Ouch. That does hurt. And it doesn’t say how much the earnest money was, but I will say I’ve lost earnest money.
There was a deal, it was a cabin and I found out some things, title issues and all this stuff after my due diligence period was over and I think it was $2,000 and they told the sellers, keep the money. I’m backing out of the deal. And looking back now, I would’ve rather have lost that $2,000 than be stuck in a deal where I’m losing even more money. And I think that would probably be the case in this situation. If I mean just six to 8,000 per year plus the flood insurance, I don’t think I have a single property right now that is that much an insurance per year.

Tony Robinson:
Yeah, that is wild. Six to eight grand plus flood insurance and flood insurance is not cheap. You have to go out and go out and get special flood insurance. Yeah, I agree with your point, Ashley. Whatever the EMD is, you have to weigh that cost against the ongoing cost of owning this property year after year after year after year to see if it actually makes sense to move forward with purchasing this property. I think a lot of this goes back to what Ash and I talk about a lot is that it’s easy to get emotionally attached to a deal and feel like you’ve already put so much time, effort, and in this case money into a deal. But sometime the smartest thing to do is to walk away. And if your deal does not work because of these new finances, then just go back to the settler and be honest.
Say, look, I had every intention of purchasing this property, but the flood insurance quotes that came back and the insurance quotes that came back are significantly higher than what I had originally anticipated. So I would ask that you release my EMD because this is not within my control. It’s not me trying to back out of the deal. Like here are the cold hard facts. Hey look, if you have an insurance agent that can give me a better price, I would love to talk to them, but if not, please work with me to make sure that we can walk away amicably. So I’m with you, Ash. I think I’m walking away from this deal because it’s not worth stepping into

Ashley Kehr:
Wait 100%. That should be the first step is trying to renegotiate with the seller. You might as well ask, they probably don’t want to have to start all over in the process of selling the property. So maybe they do have some wiggle room to continue to make it work. But that’s where I would start.

Tony Robinson:
And kudos to you for being 22 and locking down your first house hack, right? And then it’s a great way to start. We’re going to take a quick break, but while we’re gone, if you haven’t yet followed the podcast on Instagram at BiggerPockets rookie, then you can follow Ashley at Wealth and Rentals and me at Tony j Robinson and we’ll be right back after a quick break. Alright guys, we’re back and we’re here with our final question. This one’s about short-term rentals, taxes, and regulations. So the question is, I currently invest in long-term rentals but cannot take advantage of real estate professional status due to my W2 job using the short-term rental tax loophole to offset my W2 income with supercharge my investments. But I’m afraid of buying a property denied, but I’m afraid of buying a property and getting denied a short-term rental license.
Can anyone recommend beginner friendly STR markets, preferably within three to four hours of NYC? Alright, so a few things to unpack here. I think the first piece is that we need to break down what the short-term rental tax loophole is. I’ll try and do this in a way that’s super clear for everyone to understand. Real estate investing offers the ability to take losses, whether those are real losses like you actually lost money on that property or paper losses, things like depreciation, which is not a real expense, but it’s a paper loss. You can take those losses and apply them against other forms of income that you collect. Now, in order to take those paper losses and apply them against your W2 income, you have to be what’s called a real estate professional or qualify for what’s called the real estate professional status. For most people with a day job, it’s virtually impossible because you have to show that you put more hours into your real estate business than you do into your day job.
Most people can’t prove that. But with short term rentals, because they are classified as a business in the eyes of the IRS, not necessarily passive income like a long-term rental, you don’t have to qualify for real estate professional status. There’s something called material participation. And as long as you can show that you materially participate in your short-term rental, that then unlocks your ability to take the passive losses from your short-term rental and apply them against your W2 income. So I know that’s a mouthful, but if you just look up short-term rental tax loop, you’ll get some more insights there. So that’s this person’s motivation. And I know a lot of people who invest in short-term rentals primarily for the tax benefits associated with it, and it truly does give you the ability to largely reduce or sometimes even eliminate your tax bill altogether. Okay, so that’s the first piece.
Now, what this person is worried about is the regulatory landscape of the short-term rental industry. And while it’s shrewd that the regulations across the country have changed, shifted, evolved, some have gotten significantly more strict, it doesn’t mean that every single market is this huge regulatory risk when it comes to short-term rentals. There are really a few core things I look at to gauge the regulatory risk in a market. The first thing I look at is what is the current ordinance in that market? Can I legally rent a short-term rental? Is there a cap? Can I only do it in certain parts of town? Does it have to be a certain property? Is there a limit on occupancy? Is there a limit on usage? Just understanding what that current ordinance is to make sure that it allows me today to profitably run this property as a short-term rental because there are some markets where you can run it as a short-term rental, but you’re capped at only using it for 30 days out of the year.
Who cares if I can use it in any way, shape, or form if I only get one month from that property? It doesn’t make sense as a short-term rental. So just understanding the current ordinance. And then the second element is understanding the risk of that ordinance changing in the future. And the core thing that I focus on when I think about answering that question, Ash, is how economically dependent is that city on the revenue generated by short-term rentals? I’m going to pick on your home state of new, and in New York City, they effectively banned short-term rentals a few years ago. But if you think about why NYC was able and willing to do that, it’s because they didn’t care about the money that short-term rentals generated for that city, right? Like NYC is one of the, if not the most populous city in the United States, it generates revenues from literally every single industry.
It has no economic dependency on Ashley and Tony’s little Airbnb. But if you think about true vacation destinations, places where people only go to vacation, those are cities that are truly dependent on the money generated by short-term rentals in the form of transient occupancy taxes in the form of property taxes, in the form of people coming in saying a few nights and spending money in the local businesses where if those short-term rentals were to shut down that local economy would be severely impacted, maybe even collapse. So we want to look for cities that have that element of economic dependency and not so much the big cities that have a lot of things driving that economy. So that is my brief masterclass on the short-term rental tax food poll and regulations and how to avoid them. Ash, any questions or what do you have to add to that?

Ashley Kehr:
Any value that I can provide is I know the New York area and destination, so I can add two places that I think would be a good short-term rental areas to invest in. I did a quick Google search and tried to look real quickly if they’re short-term rental friendly. And it really depends on the specific area, but within that three to four hours of New York City is the Poconos tons of things, skiing in the Winter Lakes in the summer, and then also Lake George. It’s one of the cleanest lakes across the us I think in a great destination area. It’s close to I think Saratoga, where they have horse r ising and different things like that. But yeah, so those would be the two markets I would look into and just searching real quick, you have to get permits, things like that. And the laws vary depending on the specific area that you’re in and things like that. But those would be the two places that I would go and stay in a short-term rental.

Tony Robinson:
And I think the other thing I’d add to that question too, Ash, and this is not true for short-term rentals, but for all strategies is ask yourself what your motivation is for staying within three to four hours of New York City. Is it because there’s just this comfort factor of being able to go and check in on the property yourself and in case something happens, you’re there to kind of be present? Or is it because maybe you want to use it yourself if it’s more so the personal use, that makes sense. But if you’re leaning towards this tighter radius simply for comfort reasons, I would encourage you to understand that whether the property is four hours away or eight hours away, you’re probably not going to be the person cleaning the Airbnb. You’re probably not going to be the person fixing maintenance issues. You’re not going to be the person restocking supplies, you’re going to hire all of those things out anyway.
So if you can find a deal in a property that’s in Bozeman, Montana or Des Moines, Iowa, or name the city in the random place on the west coast, if that is a better deal for your specific situation, I wouldn’t say that you should necessarily avoid that just because it’s not as close as you want it to be. There are tons and tons of people every single day who are buying properties remotely and are successfully managing them as long as they have the right systems and processes in place and likely for you. You’re already listening to this podcast and we share a lot of the different ways you can do that remotely.

Ashley Kehr:
And one thing I would add too is if you want to use it for yourself personally, make sure you’re aware of what the rule is for that. Isn’t it a pretty gray area though, Tony, as to how many days you can actually use it if you’re writing it off as a short-term rental?

Tony Robinson:
Yeah, there was a lot of discussion on this, but yeah, I mean, usually what most lenders say is that somewhere around seven to 14 days is a good baseline of personal use. So there’s actually two different things we’re talking about here. One is a lending requirement, and then the other is how the IRS views it. So from the IRS perspective, your average state duration for the year has to be seven days or less. So as long as your average guests stay, when you look at all your reservations is seven days or less, then you’re still able to quantify this as a business. Once you get over seven days, they start to treat it more like a traditional long-term rental and you lose that ability to qualify for material participation. But if you’re seven days or less, you get that ability. So midterm rentals wouldn’t qualify for material participation because most of your saves are 30 days or more on the lending side.
The only real requirement is if you’re using a second home loan to purchase the property, and if you’re using the second home loan, there’s a personal use carve out where you have to use a property yourself in order to qualify for that specific loan. And I’ve heard different figures from different lenders, but seven to 14 days is like a usual good benchmark, but you just got to have the intention to use it yourself at some point during the year. So luckily, those two things are not connected. So I can get whatever kind of debt I want. I can get hard money, private money, conventional debt, not FHA, because you got to live there, but I can do any kind of debt that I want, and as long as I’m seven days or less, I can still qualify for material participation.

Ashley Kehr:
Yeah, I think another point I wanted to make on that too is just if their motivation is three to four hours is because they want to use it for personal use, knowing that they can’t spend, depending which way they go, they can’t spend their whole summer staying there, going every single week up there for the whole summer if they are going to use it for the short-term rental tax loophole or whatever too. So I thought I would use my A-frame all the time, the day I was so sad to rent it out the day I rented out, I was like, oh, don’t worry, kids are going to come here all the time. We haven’t stayed the night once. Maybe one time we went since we started booking it out, but it’s like, yeah, don’t make that a huge deciding factor, I would say, as to deciding on a market if you don’t know for sure if you’ll actually use it or not. Anyways, thank you guys so much for listening to this episode of Real Estate Rookie. I’m Ashley. He’s Tony, and we’ll see you guys on the next episode.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].



Source link


This episode alone could save you hundreds, thousands, or tens of thousands in taxes—all with 100% legal means.

If you own a rental property, you could be paying significantly less in taxes. With the US tax code being favorable to real estate investors and renewed provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill, real estate investing is one of the most tax-advantaged investments on the planet. Today, we’re showing you how to pay the least amount of taxes, before tax day 2026!

Amanda Han, CPA and real estate investor, says 40% of the tax returns she reviews are not optimized for deductions. Investors are leaving thousands on the table and giving it straight to the IRS. But after this episode, you won’t have to anymore.

We’re talking about how real estate investors can reduce their taxable income by up to 20%—instantly. Plus, the one renewed tax deduction that creates six-figure write-offs for investors, and what you can start doing right now to lower your taxes as much as possible starting in 2026. 

Dave:
If you skip this episode, you could be leaving thousands of dollars on the table. They say there’s only two things guaranteed in life, death, and taxes. And since you’re alive watching this right now, today we’re going to focus on the latter how real estate investors can legally pay less tax. And things have changed a lot this year. Big time. The big beautiful bill tax provisions are going into effect for this April’s tax deadline, and it has huge implications for real estate investors, and that’s true whether you own one rental or an entire portfolio. The strategies we’re sharing today, they could save you hundreds, thousands, or even tens of thousands of dollars over the lifetime of your investments. In this episode, we’re also going to share under the radar tax strategy that 99% of investors are missing out on. And we’ll have a CPA tell us what you need to do today so you’re never scrambling during tax time again.
Hey, what’s up everyone? I’m Dave Meyer, chief Investment Officer at BiggerPockets. Today’s guest on the show is Amanda Hahn. If you haven’t heard Amanda before, she’s been on the show a lot, but she’s an expert. She’s a CPA tax strategist, and she’s a real estate investor herself. She specializes in helping investors pay the least amount of possible taxes legally. And since April 15th is coming sooner than any of us hope or think. Let’s bring out Amanda and learn together how to save some money this year. Amanda Hahn, welcome back to the BiggerPockets podcast. Thanks so much for being here.

Amanda:
Yeah, thanks for having me, Dave. I’m super excited to be back.

Dave:
Well, we’ve had you on the show many times, but some in our audience may not know who you are yet, so can you just introduce yourself for us?

Amanda:
Of course. Hi everyone. My name is Amanda Hahn, and what I always tell people is that I am a CPA by day and by nighttime I am like many of you a real estate investor. My husband and I co-authored the two BiggerPockets textbooks, so if you haven’t checked those out, make sure to do so. One of my passions is really in helping to educate people on all the different things they can do to use real estate, to not just build wealth, but also to save a significant amount in taxes if you do things correctly. So really excited to be here. It’s that time of the year when taxes are top of mind.

Dave:
It is. Well, thanks for joining us today, and if you haven’t read Amanda’s book and you want to save money on taxes, it’s the single best thing that you could do. Self-admittedly, Amanda, this about me am terrible at this stuff. I’m not good at tax strategy, but I’ve gotten better because of reading Amanda’s books and getting to know her. So definitely check that out, but hopefully we’ll give you a little taste of the kind of stuff that you can learn here in this episode. So Amanda, maybe just break it down for us, for people who might be new to investing or for those who are just scaling their portfolio, I think a lot of us, it takes a little time to realize that you should be thinking about taxes. What sort of the big buckets of tax strategy that investors should be thinking about?

Amanda:
Yeah, well, we will start at the basics, which is that it’s important to understand when you invest in real estate, you are actually a business owner in the eyes of the IRS. And so we hear people talk a lot about how tax law favors business owners when it comes to write-offs, deductions, depreciation. And so it’s really important to understand that as a real estate investor, I am now able to take advantage of a lot of those same tax benefits and deductions that the traditional business owner has access to. And this is true regardless of whether we own our rentals in our individual name or in our trust or in an LLC,

Dave:
We call it real estate investing. But it really is just entrepreneurship. You’re starting a small business to own real estate just like any other service business or business that you create. And that is good. That’s a good thing for real estate investing. That’s why you get better tax benefits than if you were to go out and buy stock or cryptocurrency or anything like that. That’s why real estate has so many advantages. So what are the big things that people should be thinking about as they enter tax season right now?

Amanda:
What’s really interesting is when we work with investors all over the US on proactive tax planning, about 40% of tax returns that we review from previous years are not optimized for tax savings. And I can share some of the most common mistakes I see. And I think these are kind of the things that we should all keep in mind
As we get ready for tax season. And we’ll start with just capturing expenses as real estate investors. I think we’re all really good at making sure we write off our mortgage interest and property taxes and management fees. But some of those common mis deductions, even insurance, property insurance is one that we see missed pretty frequently. Really, and it’s really strange because we all have property insurance, but just some of the overhead things. Home office, most real estate investors manage their rentals from their home. Very few people actually go out and rent an office space. So if you have an eligible office, make sure you are claiming it because it does help you to save on taxes either today or sometime in the future depending on your facts and circumstances, but just overhead expenses, going to BiggerPockets conference, your BiggerPockets membership, buying a textbook, for example, using your car for business, right?

Dave:
Yeah, absolutely. For sure. I always wonder about travel. Is that something that you can deduct? I invest out of state, and so sometimes I’m going to visit the Midwest and I’m staying at hotels. That’s something I can deduct, right?

Amanda:
Yeah, for sure. And you actually, it’s not a requirement that you own rental properties in a state in order to take a tax deduction. What is required is that you’re able to demonstrate the main reason for that travel is related to real estate activities. So for example, if I didn’t own any properties in Orlando, but I’m going to Orlando for a BiggerPockets conference, that travel itself should be tax deductible, right? The flights, the hotels, the food when I’m there. And same thing, if I happen to have a trip planned to go to Ohio to look for rental properties, even though I don’t end up buying any properties, my travel costs could be deductible as long as I can show I went there for the purpose of looking for real estate touring properties and things like that.

Dave:
So I want everyone to listen to that. This is something that comes out a lot when we talk about outstate investing. People don’t go and visit markets that they’re considering investing in. And I always encourage people to do it. It’s a big expense, I understand that, but it is tax deductible in most situations. So that does take the sting out of it a little bit. It is a business expense and encourage you to think about it. So that’s one big thing people should be thinking about the returns, right, expenses. What else is there?

Amanda:
Well, along this kind of a similar line, oftentimes when we review tax returns, obviously one of the big things we look at is depreciation, right? Our ability to take a paper loss on the purchase price of the rental building we purchased, and we frequently we’ll see the depreciation as a very round number. So $500,000 for Main Street or $200,000 for Fremont Street. And that usually jumps out to me as not really capturing all of our costs associated with the acquisition of a property. Because we all know when we buy a property, we’re not just paying the purchase price of it, we are also paying closing costs. And there is different allocated or prorated property taxes, insurance and all those. So one thing we can do for any of you who’ve purchased a property during the year, sold the property, refinanced on a property, make sure you send your closing disclosure to your accountant as you get ready to meet them because then they can take the closing disclosure and pull out all of those associated expenses beyond just you telling them what the purchase price is.

Dave:
Okay, that’s a very good tip. And how big of a difference does it make? If you have an average rental property, it’s $400,000, you’re making some cashflow off of it, how big of a difference in your tax is it when you prepare the tax, right? And when you do it sort of just haphazardly?

Amanda:
Oh, the answer really depends from person to person, right? Because one question is going to be what is your tax rate? If you’re someone who is in a high tax bracket because you make a lot of income from other sources, then even a thousand dollars of a deduction could save you $500 in actual cash. And for some people that’s, it’s a decent amount. I think for anyone, I would never throw away $500 for no good reason. No. But if you have a good system to track your expenses, those items add up over time. So if you’re able to utilize it this year to offset your taxes, great. If you can’t because of passive activity limitations in the tax world, I always encourage clients, still track them, send it to your accountant because you want to make sure it’s reported. Because even the expenses that you can utilize today, you never lose them. You get to utilize them some point in the future.

Dave:
In an era of real estate investing where it’s super hard to find cashflow, this is cashflow. We often treat taxes as this separate income source or something different to think about in real estate. But as Amanda just said, she used a modest example of if you can save 500 bucks, that’s reasonable. If you could save 1200 bucks and that’s a hundred dollars a month in cashflow, that could change your cash on cash return from 3% to 6% in a given year if you’re actually just doing this right? And it’s one of the ways I think you could just keep more money in your pocket and that really has measurable differences in your actual overall return profile.

Amanda:
Yeah, I used a very small example, but if we go to the other extreme and say, well, how impactful could that be in real life? If we’re talking about somebody who invested in a rental property where the building was $400,000 with the current law where we have a hundred percent bonus depreciation, that could be what? $120,000 of a deduction just in the first year. If you’re in a 50% tax bracket, that could be $60,000 in tax saving. So we’re saying, okay, save 500 or save 60,000. I love both of those.

Dave:
Yeah, sign me up a hundred percent. Alright, so those are some great basics that everyone, whether you’re just starting or have a big portfolio should be listening to. Of course this year we have some exciting tax stuff, I think from a real estate investing perspective where many of the provisions that were passed last year in the one big beautiful bill act are starting to go in effect. So I want to pick your brain on that a little bit. Amanda, we do have to take one quick break. We’ll be right back. Welcome back to the BiggerPockets podcast. I’m here with Amanda Hahn talking about tax strategy. It’s the beginning of the year, it’s time that we all start thinking about this. Amanda enlightened us before the break just on how you should be thinking about capturing your expenses on a property level and how to maximize your deduction so you can keep more money in your pocket. A lot of things are changing though, Amanda. It’s not just the same old, same old in tax world for real estate investors. So maybe you can give us a high level overview of what has changed and what’s in the big beautiful bill act that is relevant for real estate investors.

Amanda:
Yes. Well, I mean not surprisingly with the current administration, the one big beautiful bill included a ton of very amazing benefits for real estate investors. One that I think everybody was really excited for was the return of 100% bonus depreciation.
Previous to that, we can always take depreciation on our rental properties, but under the old law, if there hasn’t been changes this year, bonus depreciation would’ve only been at 20%. So with the change of the law, now bonus depreciation for 2026 is at a hundred percent, which effectively means if you bought a property after January 19th, 2025 or anytime in 2026 and the foreseeable future, not only do we get to take depreciation on our rental properties, but that amount is supercharged, meaning we can take a very significant tax benefit upfront rather than the traditional rule of having to wait over a significant number of years to take a tax write off for it.

Dave:
And maybe you could just help us understand what is the benefit of frontloading depreciation and what are some instances or circumstances where you recommend that for real estate investors?

Amanda:
For sure, the purpose or the benefit of accelerated depreciation, basically saying rather than waiting over time to take a tax benefit on the purchase price of my rental building, I’m going to do what’s called a cost segregation study. And what that does is it allows me to then take faster depreciation this year and maybe the next few years rather than having to wait. So effectively we’re looking at the time value of money of

Speaker 3:
Savings.

Amanda:
In other words, I know I have to pay taxes to the IRS, I can either pay it now or I can pay it slowly over the next 27 or 39 years. And if I choose to pay my taxes later, that means I’m able to keep my cash longer with me today and reinvest and grow that money today rather than just giving it to the IRS. So that’s where the concept of it. Now, I will say it is not for everyone. So don’t run out and start taking accelerated depreciation just because you hear it here. The ideal profile of when you want to take accelerated depreciation are in years where you can actually benefit from it. So that would be years where you have high taxable income and or years where you can actually utilize rental losses to offset that different set of income that you’re generating, whether it’s from a W2 or a business that you operate. And so conversely, who should not do a cost segregation? Well, you should not accelerate depreciation if you’re not able to utilize it this year.

Dave:
For someone like me or maybe for someone else who has a W2 job is bonus depreciation and doing the cost even worth it.

Amanda:
Another great time to do cost segregation is if you have a gain. So let’s say I have a portfolio, but I sold one rental for a huge gain and I didn’t want to 10 31 exchange or use other strategies. I could also consider a cost segregation on one of the properties in my existing portfolio and try to offset one with the other.

Dave:
So you can actually take the depreciation from one portfolio property and apply it to another one even if you’re not a real estate professional.

Amanda:
Yep, exactly. Exactly.

Dave:
Love that.

Amanda:
And I will say one other thing since we’re on the topic of someone who is not a real estate professional, you may have been told by your accountant that there is no tax benefit to you investing in real estate because either you work full time or you make too much money. And when you hear that from an accountant, they’re doing what I called tunnel visioning because all they’re saying is, for example, Dave, you are not going to see a huge benefit this year in owning rental real estate. You’re still going to pay taxes on your W2 income. But what they’re not factoring in are the different benefits, which is I generated rental cash flow that I’m not paying taxes on. And also in the future when I generate future cashflow, I may not have to pay taxes on. And also the most important part, which is at the end of my investment with this specific property, if I were to sell it at that point, I can actually use all of the accumulated losses from that property to reduce not just the capital gains from the sale, but also W2 and all other income as well. So there’s absolutely benefit to being a real estate investor. It’s just a timing of when somebody actually sees that.

Dave:
One of the things I struggled with early in my investing career is you look at these things, you say, oh, I’m going to pay this tax eventually if I just defer it. And at least for me, I didn’t really appreciate the time value of money element. I can keep more principle in my pocket and use that to go buy other investment properties to make renovations on my properties. And in addition to just delaying that, this is getting nerdy about it, but you also wind up paying your taxes in inflated devalued dollars over time too. So you’re purchasing power. Part of the idea of the time value is money is your money is worth today more than it’s worth in the future. And so if you can hold onto it and use it to build your portfolio currently, then it’s better to invest a hundred dollars today than it’s a hundred dollars several years from now.
And so that’s one of the main things about tax strategy that real estate allows you to do. And that’s kind of the same idea behind a 10 31 too, right? You eventually in theory at least have to pay that tax, but if you can defer that and go out and save the 20% on capital gains and just go buy another property, it means you just have more purchasing power, which is so powerful, especially early in your investing career. So anyway, long conversation here about bonus depreciation, depreciation in general. Anything else from the one big beautiful Bill act that our audience should know about?

Amanda:
Yeah, well beyond bonus depreciation, one of the good things about the one big beautiful bill is that we were able to retain the tax that’s called qualified business income deduction, QBI for short. So that was something that was available that was then extended as part of the one big beautiful bill. And basically the reason we care about that is real estate investors is QBI basically allows certain types of business income to have tax-free treatment up to 20%. So an example could be if I’ve owned my rentals for many years and even after using depreciation and cost segregation, I have to pay taxes. There’s taxable income. Well, under QBI, if I had a hundred dollars worth of taxable income, I may only have to pay taxes on $80 of it, which means $20 of my taxable rental income could be completely tax free. And this doesn’t just apply to rental income, it applies to all different types of income, specifically in real estate as well. So for those of you who are flipping properties, doing wholesale, or if you’re property manager co-hosting all of the different types, up to 20% of that taxable income could potentially be tax free under QBI deduction. And that is something we enjoy for 2025 as well as 2026.

Dave:
Amazing. Finally, a tax win for flippers at wholesalers. Honestly, as you’re listening to Amanda, most of the benefits for real estate investors come with buy and hold styles of investing. It doesn’t need to be rentals. A lot of them still apply for short-term rentals or midterm rentals, but it’s kind of a buy and hold. The transactional kind of real estate doesn’t always get the same treatment. But QBI is a great example,

Amanda:
Although I will say that for some reason a lot of tax returns we review that are prepared by other firms are often missing that QBI deduction. So one of the things as you’re getting ready to meet with your accountant to file last year’s taxes, that’s another question you can add to the list is just to have them double check, make sure I’m getting my qualified business income deduction. And it very well could be that, hey, it doesn’t apply to you because you have rental losses, right? So when we have losses, it doesn’t apply because we’re already not paying taxes on it. But to the extent you have taxable income from real estate or even a non-real estate business, it’s super, super significant when it comes to savings. We see this mostly with our clients who do fix and flips and our clients who are on the active real estate side, brokers, realtors, has been a very significant tax saving in the past couple of years.

Dave:
All right, well everyone, make sure that you have QBI or at least think about QBI and see if you qualify for this QBI deduction this year. Sounds like that could be a huge savings. Alright, we got to take a quick break, but when we come back, we’re going to talk to Amanda about how to set yourself up for a stress-free and hopefully very profitable tax prep season this year. Stay with us. We’ll be right back. Welcome back to the BiggerPockets podcast. I’m Dave Meyer here with Amanda Hahn talking tax prep and tax strategy for 2026. We’ve talked about what things you should be looking for in your tax prep this year. Talked about the new changes in the one big beautiful bill act that investors should be paying attention to. But Amanda, I just want to talk about the stress that comes with tax prep. It’s not fun for most people, so how do you systematically recommend people go about doing this so that they can capture the most benefit, but that’s not driving them crazy?

Amanda:
I’ll tell you what I feel are the two main reasons people hate tax season. I mean outside of just the fact that they have to pay taxes. I think one is record keeping. Okay, if you’re someone who has not done good record keeping last year, this is sort of the end of the road where you’re like, man, now I got to go through my bank statements and my receipts and try to categorize all the stuff that I don’t remember what I did or didn’t do. And really the best way to change that is just to have systems in place, right systems for your bookkeeping and accounting. If you have the budget to outsource it, great, take that off of your hands If you don’t, it’s really just a matter of setting time aside on a monthly basis to make sure you do all of that.
Because if you’re like me, it’s difficult for me to remember what I did a week ago. So for me to have to think about a year ago, that’s the stress of like, oh my gosh, it’s like a mountain of paperwork and we know it’s coming every year, tax time comes. So I think just taking the time set up a system that works for you, whether it’s QuickBooks or SSA or an Excel spreadsheet, whatever that happens to be, but getting the system set up so you are doing it on a month-to-month basis really will help alleviate a lot of the stress at tax time. I think the second reason people don’t like tax season is the surprise. So the surprise of

Dave:
So true,

Amanda:
The anxiety of like, am I any refund? Am I going to owe a lot? The best way to alleviate or prevent that is with proactive tax planning. So for a lot of our clients, and that’s why we focus so much on the planning because your tax bills should never be a surprise. If you’re planning during the year, if you’re meeting with your accountant throughout the year, before you buy properties, before you sell properties, before you open a new LLC or partner with a friend of yours, to always kind of have at least touch points on, okay, what’s our income, what’s our deductions? So that by the end of the year in December, we have a pretty good idea whether we owe or we’re going to get a refund. But I will say you can only have effective tax planning if you have good financial records. So that also goes back to just having clean bookkeeping. So we know

Dave:
That’s a good point.

Amanda:
We can monitor year round.

Dave:
Well, I want to talk to you more about tax planning. I think that’s a super important thing. But when you talk about bookkeeping, are there any tools? You mentioned QuickBooks, tesa, both good tools. Are there any new ones? I’ve been getting a lot of ads honestly for AI bookkeeping. I don’t know if that’s just people who want to say everything is AI right now, but it’s really just the same product. It’s always been. But are there any specific things that you think people should be looking for when they’re setting up a system

Amanda:
From a tax perspective? The main thing you want to look for is the ability to track income and expenses by property. That is what’s required for IRS reporting. And also just for you as a property owner, if you have multiple properties, I want to know how each property is doing. And I think a quick tip I would say is to have a separate bank account that you use exclusively for real estate things.

Dave:
A hundred percent, yes.

Amanda:
If you have an LLC for your rental properties, use that account. If there’s no money in there, you transfer money from your personal account into the LLC account and then pay for the expenses. That I think helps to cut people’s bookkeeping headache by maybe 80 or 90%.

Dave:
Yes, there is a no brainer for doing that. That’s a great quick tip. So let’s talk a little bit about tax planning proactively. I like this idea. So can you give us an example? I’m going out to buy a new property this year. I call you and say, how do I plan for this in the most taxed optimal way? What are some of the things you’re thinking about or some of the things I should be thinking about?

Amanda:
And I think, again, it kind of depends a little bit on the different facts and profiles of a specific taxpayer. So if we’re saying, oh, well Dave is not a real estate professional, a household with dual income W2, nobody is really able to claim real estate professional status, then maybe a recommendation could be, can we consider a rental property or the next one you buy to be a short-term rental?
Why? Because short-term rentals, we can use the short-term rental loophole where you don’t have to quit your job. Real estate could be a side hustle. You could potentially use the short-term rental losses against W2 and other types of income provided that you meet all of the requirements that still being hands-on and all those things. And so that part of the conversation then maybe kind of veers into where should the property be? Should it be close enough where you can be more hands-on, or are you comfortable with using apps to be able to semi manage or self-manage remotely as well? And then what kind of entity who should be on it? Is it one person, both spouses? So that’s the fun part, right? The initial question is, I want to buy more real estate this year. And then it turns into a lot of different decision makings on, well, have you considered this or that also to get the optimal tax benefit too.

Dave:
Yeah, and I would imagine we started this section of show just talking about stress, that when you plan this upfront, that basically takes away what you were saying, the stress of the unknown at the end of the year. When you add a new property, it’s only incrementally making your taxes more complicated, not like doubling it. If you’re going from one to two properties, now you have double the amount of work you have to do for taxes

Amanda:
For sure. I mean, just having even a system could be, I have a checklist whenever I buy new properties, here are the things I need to put in a folder, the closing disclosure, the appraisal form. I also probably want to make sure I have an entity set up, or at least I’m going to call my CPA, let them know these things happened. So just having that already. So every time I am expanding my portfolio, these are the things I’m going to keep here together. And that tax time is just a matter of sharing all those things in that folder with your accountant or with your bookkeeper even on a monthly basis.

Dave:
Awesome. Well, this is great advice and I really recommend people doing this. Again, I know I keep saying this, but I just think in general, people get really excited about buying properties when they’re first starting, which is right. And then two years into your investing career, you’re like, oh my God, I could have been doing this so much better from a tax perspective, but take it from me, take it from Amanda. Just try and do this stuff upfront. I promise you it will be worth your time and money. It is always worth your time and money to start doing these things upfront.

Amanda:
And I will say I unfortunately do meet people who historically are very model citizens when it comes to tax filing. If they just have a W2 job, they own their home and it’s like always filed on time, filed by February or March, and then, oh, I bought rental properties and then I got overwhelmed and I just basically stopped filing tax returns because I didn’t know what to do. But I think it’s really important to understand if I’m describing you as a listener, it’s really important to understand that taxes don’t go away, so you will have to file your tax return. And again, the sooner you do it, the better you’re going to feel. I promise you.

Dave:
All right. One last question for you, Amanda, before you get out of here. You said you’re also a real estate investor. What are you investing in these days?

Amanda:
Oh, well, actually I live in California, but I grew up in Las Vegas and I went to college there. So a big part of our portfolio has been in Las Vegas, so we continue to expand in Vegas. But I think our latest acquisition was in Florida, and I talk about this with clients as well. In the last couple of years, we’ve gotten more and more into passive investments through syndications and things like that all over the us. And for us, it’s just a change in priorities. And our focus, we’re in a season of life where we have two young boys that require a lot of attention with sports and all the things. So it wasn’t like before when we were starting out, it was a lot of Burr properties. We have the time, we didn’t have the money, we had the time, and now we’re in a different place where we have more of the resources but not as much time to go after the properties ourselves. And we might change when the kids leave us and go off to college, then we might go back to doing burrs or maybe doing our own apartment buildings.

Dave:
A hundred percent. I’ve done the same thing, done a lot more passive investing over the last couple of years. And that’s the benefit. You get to a place where you’ve put in the hard work and then you get to choose. You get to choose if you want to do investing passive. I moved back to the States now I’ve kind of missed doing some active investing. So I’m doing that more for fun than just not needing to. But that’s the goal. So congratulations on getting to that stage in your investing career.

Amanda:
Yeah, thank you. And are you considering house hacking with your new home?

Dave:
I’m calling it a live-in flip because we’re not renting out any part of it, but we bought an under, it’s a 1968 build and it feels like it’s 1968, I’ll tell you that. We got popcorn ceilings. We still have those intercoms that people used to have super old school. They still work. It’s pretty fun to use

Amanda:
Only in the expensive homes though, when they have those, right?

Dave:
I think back in the day, yeah, it was nice, but it’s still perfectly comfortable. But the idea is we’re going to start renovating it and hopefully spend probably in somewhere in the 200, 250 grand range, but we think it will increase the value like 400,000. This is in Seattle, very expensive market. But that’s kind of the idea. But I’m calling it a live in flip, but I don’t know if we’ll actually sell it after two years. We might live in it for longer, but we’ll see. But we’re going to do a value add to it.

Amanda:
Yeah, I love that. And I think a lot of clients, I mean a lot of newer investors think that primary home investment strategies are for people who are just starting out in real estate, but I think people will be shocked to know how many of our clients that are doing very large deals also try to optimize their primary home a hundred percent to the nth degree. So I love that.

Dave:
Yeah. The other place we were considering buying was a house hack. It was like an up down duplex, and we were going to rent out the bottom basement. Personally, my dream home is like a primary that has an A DU above a garage that I could rent out. That would be the perfect situation. But Henry and I actually just did a show about this yesterday. We recorded it talking about how at every phase of your investing career, thinking about your primary residence as an investment makes sense. You don’t have to for your lifestyle, but there are always things you can do to make your primary home a money maker for you if you’re willing to make what I think are pretty small sacrifices to get those gains.

Amanda:
And the tax benefits are just typically pretty amazing when we’re talking about primary homes. Absolutely.

Dave:
Well, Amanda, thank you so much as always for being here. We really appreciate it.

Amanda:
Yeah, thanks for having me.

Dave:
And if you want to learn more from Amanda, you should go check out her two books that she’s written. You can get them on biggerpockets.com or you can always find them on Amazon. And I’m happy to say Amanda will be back at BP Con this year speaking and leading a tax workshop. As she always does, BP Con tickets are now available. Early bird tickets are for sale to the cheapest they will ever be. So if you want to get in there and get some hands-on advice from Amanda and her husband Matt, come to BP Con in Orlando this year, biggerpockets.com/conference. And if you to hear the episode I was just talking about with Henry and I talking about primary residents, it’s episode 1236. It came out on February 6th. Go check that out. Thanks again, Amanda, and thank you all so much for listening to this episode of the BiggerPockets podcast. We’ll see you next time.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].



Source link


Existing home sales fell in January to a more than two-year low after December’s strong rebound, as tight inventory continued to push home prices higher and winter storms weighed on activity. Despite mortgage rates trending lower and wage growth outpacing price gains, limited resale supply kept many buyers on the sidelines. Resale inventory remained at lowest level since January 2025. Though home price appreciation has slowed in recent months, affordability remains a challenge.

Total existing home sales, including single-family homes, townhomes, condominiums, and co-ops, fell 8.4% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 3.91 million in January, according to the National Association of Realtors (NAR). This marks the lowest level since August 2024. On a year-over-year basis, sales were 4.4% lower than a year ago.

The existing home inventory level was 1.2 million units in January, down 0.8% from December but up 3.4% from a year ago. At the current sales rate, January unsold inventory sits at a 3.7-months’ supply, up from 3.5-months in December and January 2024. Inventory between 4.5 to 6 months’ supply is generally considered a balanced market.

Homes stayed on the market for a median of 46 days in January, up from 39 days in the previous month and 41 days in January 2025.

The first-time buyer share was 31% in January, up from 29% in December and 28% from a year ago.

The January all-cash sales share was 27% of transactions, down from 28% in December and 29% a year ago. All-cash buyers are less affected by changes in interest rates.

The January median sales price of all existing homes was $396,800, up 0.9% from last year. This marks the new high for the month of January and the 31st consecutive month of year-over-year increases. The median condominium/co-op price in January was up 3.8% from a year ago at $364,600. Recent gains for home inventory will put downward pressure on resale home prices in most markets in 2026.

Sales declined in all four major regions in January, ranging from 5.9% in the Northeast to 10.3% in the West. On a year-over-year basis, sales also fell across all regions, from 1.6% in the South to 7.9% in the West.

The Pending Home Sales Index (PHSI) is a forward-looking indicator based on signed contracts. The PHSI fell from 79.2 to 71.8 in December after four months of increases. On a year-over-year basis, pending sales were 3.0% lower than a year ago, according to the National Association of Realtors’ data. The decline suggests buyers are holding back due to limited inventory choices.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


Looking for an affordable, cash-flowing market earmarked for major development and a projected population and economic surge? Grand Rapids, Michigan, could fit the bill.

Among the new projects planned in a billion-dollar development, the Transformational Brownfield Plan in the Grand Rapids Riverfront area, is the construction of a new soccer stadium, amphitheater, apartment building, and supportive infrastructure, Michigan Public, an NPR station, reported when the project was announced in 2024.

In late 2025, another development was announced: the seven-acre Fulton & Market riverfront plan, led by Magellan Development and local partners, costing $795 million, backed by the Michigan Strategic Fund, and including multiple new housing projects.

“This corridor has long been a vital part of the community, home to so many people and businesses that make Grand Rapids special,” Winnie Brinks (D-Grand Rapids) said in a statement. “It’s great to see them finally getting the attention and investment they deserve.”?

The Michigan Economic Development Corporation reports that the development will add roughly 630-735 new housing units, including three new towers, with tax-capture incentives. Magellan president J.R. Berger called the Transformational Brownfield Plan “a cornerstone of the Fulton and Market development” that unlocks the ability “to transform riverfront parking into a vibrant ecosystem of residential, restaurant, office, retail, hospitality, and public space that connects neighborhoods and further energizes downtown Grand Rapids riverfront.”

The Appeal to Investors

Those unbeatable Midwest price tags, coupled with economic development, have made the chilly Great Lakes area and beyond a hotbed for investors in recent years. Below the hulking skyline cranes and beyond the hype of the Midwest, Grand Rapids is anchored by some sturdy business fundamentals.

According to regional economic development group The Right Place, Greater Grand Rapids’ cost of living is about 8% below the national average, even as the area experienced 6.1% population growth over the last 10 years and a 9% increase year over year in residential building permits in 2024, which occurred in conjunction with burgeoning healthcare and tech industries.

The Stats

In a positive sign for investing, the Grand Rapids area is predicted to enjoy a moderate but steady price appreciation rather than an explosive boom and all the frenzy that comes with it. A housing trends analysis from Redfin noted that as of January 2026, the median sale price in the city was about $282,000. That marked a roughly 4.4% increase from last year, with the price per square foot up 5%, and homes sold in a brisk 33 days, signaling a price-sensitive buying public, but overall demand remains solid.

Realtor.com named Grand Rapids as one of its “refuge markets,” where buyers are migrating from larger, more expensive metros in search of affordability, value, and stability.

“Our 2026 top housing markets offer better value than nearby high-cost hubs, yet steady demand and persistent inventory shortages keep prices moving upward,” Danielle Hale, chief economist at Realtor.com, said in a press release. “For buyers, that can mean more competition and faster price gains. For sellers and homeowners, it signals strong demand or home price appreciation and equity gains.”

A Deeper Dive

Home prices in Grand Rapids rose a healthy 9% in 2024, preceded by 7% in 2023 and a 32% increase overall since 2021, according to Grand Valley State University’s Seidman Business Review, drawing on data from Greater Regional Alliance of Realtors (2025) and Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (2025). The price increases in the area have been driven by rising employment and constrained supply, which seems set to change, as 40% of residential permits in 2024 were for multifamily construction.

The Investor’s Play

The economic push toward development, as well as toward more established healthcare and tech industries, creates a housing need. For smaller investors, development projects always create opportunities around the glossy new riverfront condos in the modest infill projects in surrounding corridors.

According to real estate company Cornerstone Home Group, the best values for investors to buy in Grand Rapids come with B-class and C-class properties, which include the biggest Grand Rapids neighborhood Creston (North Grand Rapids), as well as the West Side, Southwest/Burton Heights, and Walker, all of which should be able to be purchased between $150,000 and $300,000, per Zillow data. 

Rents and their outlooks for investors are as follows, according to Cornerstone:

  • Studio, about $1,280 to $1,330 per month: Stable to modest gains
  • One-bedroom, about $1,420 to $1,540: Moderate gains
  • Two-bedroom, about $1,640 to $1,800: Moderate gains helped by new builds
  • Three-bedroom, about $1,850 to above $2,110: Stronger gains, especially for single-family rentals

Sizable Rent Growth

Small landlords make up the main investor base in Grand Rapids (institutional investors own less than 1%), says Business Insider. Rents are up year over year from 4.1% to 4.5% as of mid-2025, according to the Cornerstone Group. This follows a statewide trend in which housing demand has increased while supply has not, leading to rent increases, according to the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.

Not helping matters have been the number of foreclosures in the state, with Michigan one of the top five states in the country for foreclosure activity as of the first half of 2025, according to ATTOM.

Final Thoughts

Grand Rapids has come a long way. It still has a way to go, however. Behind the splashy headlines of imminent development, U.S. Census statistics reveal that 16.9% of households were living in poverty, which is higher than the state average. With new construction and businesses coming to the city in the next few years, there is an ideal opportunity for astute investors to purchase low-priced rentals in pivotal areas, get them up and running, and enjoy the ride as the city takes flight.



Source link


Wage growth for residential building workers moderated notably in 2025, reflecting a broader cooling in housing activity and construction labor demand. According to the latest data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), both nominal and real wages remained modest during the fourth quarter, signaling a shift from the rapid post-pandemic expansion to a slower-growth phase.

In nominal terms, average hourly earnings (AHE) for residential building workers rose to $39.63 in December 2025, up 3.3% from $38.37 a year ago. While this marked a modest acceleration from November’s 2.0% year-over-year gain, wage growth has slowed considerably from the peak of 9.4% recorded in June 2024. Elevated mortgage rates, ongoing affordability challenges, and persistently high construction costs constrained home building activity over the past year. As a result, labor demand eased accordingly. Meanwhile, the number of open, and unfilled construction sector jobs continued to trend downward, consistent with the overall slowdown in housing activity.

Despite the slowdown in wage growth, residential building workers’ wages remain competitive relative to other industries:

9.9% higher than the manufacturing sector ($36.07 per hour)

23.3% higher than the transportation and warehousing sector ($32.14 per hour)

2.6% lower than the mining and logging sector ($40.69 per hour)

Note:

Data used in this post relate to all employees in the residential building industry. This group includes both new single-family housing construction (excluding for-sale builders) and residential remodelers but does not include specialty trade contractors.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .



“After” photos by Avery Nicole Photography

Kitchen at a Glance
Who lives here: An empty-nest couple
Location: Martindale, Texas
Size: 250 square feet (23 square meters)
Designer: Amanda Buckley of Bauley Interiors
Cabinetmaker: Kleighton Westphall of Monarch Woodworks of Austin
Builder: Blanco River Construction

Before: Gray walls, short white cabinets and laminate counters gave the former kitchen a flat, utilitarian feel. Shallow upper cabinets flanking the sink window on the left offered little storage and blocked natural light. Ceilings in the small house were less than 8 feet high, Buckley says. “The window wasn’t that big and there wasn’t enough lighting overall. They also had a vinyl-style tile above the sink but that was their only backsplash.”

A long, narrow island with stools felt especially tight, squeezed by reach-in closets along the right wall. “That essentially was their pantry,” Buckley says. “Their small appliances and pots and pans were stacked up on each other in there.” A retro-style red refrigerator sat out in the open with no clear role, while the primary stainless steel refrigerator was tucked into the far back left corner. “The red refrigerator was sort of just there,” Buckley says. “They liked the look of it but didn’t use it much.”



This article was originally published by a www.houzz.com . Read the Original article here. .


Even though garden/low-rise continues to be strong, overall confidence in the market for new multifamily housing decreased year-over-year in the fourth quarter, according to the Multifamily Market Survey (MMS) released today by the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB). The MMS produces two separate indices. The Multifamily Production Index (MPI) had a reading of 45, down three points year-over-year, while the Multifamily Occupancy Index (MOI) had a reading of 74, down seven point year-over-year.

Multifamily developers are somewhat less optimistic than they were at this time last year, except in the market segment for garden/low-rise apartments. This suggests that the 2025 trend of gains in multifamily market share for outlying metro and non-metro counties—where garden and low-rise structures are more common—is likely to continue in 2026.

Elevated construction costs and the local regulatory environment continue to be major headwinds to faster growth. While interest rates eased slightly in 2025, they still need to come down further to significantly spur new construction.

Multifamily Production Index (MPI)

The MMS asks multifamily developers to rate the current conditions as “good”, “fair”, or “poor” for multifamily starts in markets where they are active.  The index and all its components are scaled so that a number above 50 indicates that more respondents report conditions as good rather than poor. The MPI is a weighted average of four key market segments: three in the built-for-rent market (garden/low-rise, mid/high-rise, and subsidized) and the built-for-sale (or condominium) market.

The component measuring garden/low-rise was the only one to experience an increase year-over-year in the fourth quarter of 2025, rising two points to 54. This component has been above 50 every quarter in 2025. The other three components experienced year-over-year declines during the quarter. The component measuring mid/high-rise fell eight points to 31, the component measuring built-for-sale units dropped six points to 36, and the component measuring subsidized units decreased five points to 47.

Multifamily Occupancy Index (MOI)

The survey also asks multifamily property owners to rate the current conditions for occupancy of existing rental apartments in markets where they are active as “good”, “fair”, or “poor”.  Like the MPI, the MOI and all its components are scaled so that a number above 50 indicates more respondents report that occupancy is good than poor.  The MOI is a weighted average of three built-for-rent market segments (garden/low-rise, mid/high-rise, and subsidized). 

All three MOI components experienced year-over-year decreases in the fourth quarter of 2025; the mid/high-rise component plummeted 12 points to 62, the garden/low-rise component decreased five points to 76, and the subsidized component dipped three points to 88. Nevertheless, all three MOI components remain well above the break-even point of 50.

The MMS was re-designed in 2023 to produce results that are easier to interpret and consistent with the proven format of other NAHB industry sentiment surveys. Until there is enough data to seasonally adjust the series, changes in the MMS indices should only be evaluated on a year-over-year basis.

Please visit NAHB’s MMS web page for the full report.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


Dave:
Something pretty remarkable happened this week that’s going to impact every real estate investor. The House of Representatives just passed the Housing for the 21st Century Act by a vote of 390 to nine. Let that sink in for a minute. 390 to nine. In 2026 in this Congress, when was the last time you saw that kind of bipartisan support and agreement on anything? And this bill is all about real estate. It touches everything from zoning reform to manufactured housing to how community banks can lend. And if this bill actually becomes law, it could truly reshape where and how housing gets built in this country and could help eliminate the housing shortage we’ve had since the great financial crisis. So today we’re going to break this all down. I’m going to go into exactly what’s in the bill, what it means for real estate investors at every level, and why I personally think this could be one of the most important policy shifts for the housing market that we’ve seen in years.
Everyone, it’s Dave. Welcome to On the Market. This Monday, we saw something that happens pretty rarely these days actually happen. A bipartisan bill passed Congress with an overwhelming majority. And that bill is taking direct aim at the housing market. There is a lot in this bill, 37 total provisions to be exact. So although this isn’t officially law yet, if the bill gets passed, then personally I think there’s good reason to think it will get passed. If it does, real estate investors are going to need to pay attention to this. This is 37 new provisions directly impacting our industry. Now, of course, some of these provisions will be minor. They might not apply to you, but there are some ideas and policies in here that could really shake up the housing market. So today on the show, we’re digging into what we know so far, what the major ideas in the bill are, how these policies could be implemented.
And of course, we’ll talk about what this means for investors. Let’s do it. All right. We’re going to get into the bills language and those 37 provisions, not all of them, but we’ll get into a lot of them, the most important ones in just a minute. But I think let’s just first talk about why. Of all the things Congress disagrees about, are we seeing bipartisan support for a housing bill? Well, first and foremost, because it’s a real problem in the United States. We talk about this on the show a lot, but affordability is near 40 year lows. It has gotten a little better last couple of months, but it’s still really low in a historical context. And of course, there are a lot of reasons for low affordability that we talk about, but we know that a lack of supply is one of, if not the biggest major issue.
And that lack of affordability is starting to weigh on people. People talk about it all the time. I don’t know if you guys witnessed this, but even people who aren’t in real estate, the unaffordability of housing in the United States is a problem. It is now a big issue for voters. It now ranks among the top three concerns for voters across the political spectrum. So this is a problem. Politicians know it and they’re starting to pay attention to it. We’ve already talked about several of the ideas and executive orders President Trump has implemented or started to talk about, but Congress is now paying attention and is also trying to pass legislation to improve affordability. Now, again, before we get into this, I do want to remind you all that this has only passed the House of Representatives, not the Senate, but there was a similar version of the bill called the Road to Housing Act, which was also bipartisan that already passed a Senate committee 24 to zero.
So we’re seeing in both chambers of Congress right now, a lot of bipartisan support. So although some of the provisions that we’re going to talk about today will probably be tweaked and modified before they go into law, there is, I think, a very good chance that this does get implemented. We’re not talking about just some random idea. We’re actually looking at what I think is a genuine shift in political priorities around housing supply. So we got to get ahead of it. That’s why we’re digging into this today on On the Market. With that said, let’s talk about this bill. So the bill itself actually has six different sections. They call them titles. So there’s six different titles, and within them, there are a couple of different provisions. And before I cherry pick the provisions that I think will matter most, because I’m not going to sit here and list 37 different provisions for you.
I’m going to talk about the ones I personally think are going to be most impactful for the BiggerPockets and on the market community here. But before we do that, I just want to give you a roadmap of what each of these six titles is about so you have the big picture. The first one is called Building Smarter. The idea here is about zoning reform, construction streamlining, and some overhauls to environmental reviews. I think this one is going to be super important for our community. I’m going to dig into this one a lot. The second title is Local Development and Rural Housing. This affects a couple of grant programs, specifically in rural areas. So I do think this will have some impact for our community. The third, this is kind of my sleeper favorite one. It’s called manufacturer housing and finance. This is redefining what manufactured homes are, which may not sound like a lot, but I actually think has the potential to bring down construction costs, which I’m excited about.
Title four is Borrow and Family Protections. This is mostly doing with veterans groups. So for most people in the community here at BiggerPockets, not going to be impactful, but if you are active duty military or a veteran, you’re definitely going to want to pay attention to that because there’s some interesting positive stuff there. Number five is housing provider oversight. This is stuff like accountability for HUD and some housing agent transparency. Important things not really going to impact you day-to-day as a real estate investor. And then number six, which I think is pretty interesting too, is about community banking. It basically allows community banks to start more easily, changes some deposit rules. So if you use community banks, this is going to be really positive as well. So that’s the big picture, but let’s dig into each section and what it’s going to mean. Again, if you want to read it all, go look at the 37 provisions, but I’m going to highlight the ones that I personally think have the biggest impact.
We’re going to start with title one, which is building smarter. I’m not going to bury the lead here. I’m just going to just come out and say, I think this one is really important. We talk about housing supply and why there’s such a shortage all the time. Construction costs and regulation are big impediments to supply. That’s just the reality of it. And this building smarter part of the bill tries to tackle it directly. The first thing it does is creates a exclusion program for something called the NEPA, which is basically environmental reviews for a bunch of different types of housing activities from rehab projects, urban, infill construction, small scale builds. So for these types of deals, we have to get the details of it, but for more types of development, you are going to be able to streamline or actually be excluded from environmental reviews.
Now, I’m not saying that environmental reviews are bad, but they take a really long time. If you actually dig into these types of things, sometimes it can take projects months or even years to get approved because they go through continuous environmental review. That makes development really long, but it makes it even more expensive because you have all these holding costs. And it actually, according to all the research I’ve done, slows down a lot of development and limits housing supply. So this goes right after one of the biggest impediments to development and could be really impactful. So this goes right after that. And this is the kind of thing that really does bring down construction costs because if you think about what levers the government has to pull to bring down construction costs, they can’t lower the price of lumber. They can’t lower the price of labor, but they can streamline these types of things that increase holding costs like environmental reviews.
So I think this one could have a really big positive impact on housing supply. The second thing in this build smarter title, it goes after the same idea, trying to reduce the time it takes to develop housing and how much it costs to develop that housing. So the second thing is this pre-approved design pattern books they’re calling. And this is actually something we talked about on the market as an idea a couple years ago. So you know that I’m a fan of it, but basically HUD’s going to fund a pilot program for pre-reviewed building designs that are automatically code compliant. Think about it right now. If you want to go and build something, you have an architect, you have engineers, you build something, you submit it to the planning department, they check if it’s code compliant, that can take months, that increases your holding costs.
But what if there was just sort of a catalog that you could look through of pre-approved home design that allowed you to skip the month-long permitting review process because it’s already approved? This is just a pilot program right now, but I really like this idea. It’s only going to be in certain markets apparently, but I think this is a really cool idea for them to be testing because if it works, this could really help bring down costs as well. The third thing that I want to mention in that build smarter category is FHA multifamily loan limit updates. Basically, this updates the statutory max loan limits for FHA insured multifamily construction to actually reflect current costs and it pegs them going forward to a construction cost inflation formula so that they doesn’t need to keep getting updated because it’s been a while. It’s a bit outdated.
And so hopefully this will help finance multifamily construction as well. So those are the big three in Title I. There’s also a provision directing HUD to publish voluntary zoning best practice guidelines. Another idea that I like, but it’s voluntary, so I don’t know how many cities are actually going to do it. They could voluntarily change their zoning right now, but they’re choosing not to. So I don’t know how much that will do, but I like the encouragement at very least. So those are the three big ones in Title I. With that, let’s move on to Title II, which again is local development and rural housing. This whole section is basically about modernizing two of the biggest block grant programs that we have in the United States, home and CDBG, and improving rural housing. There are two provisions I’ll talk about. The first is the home program overhaul.
You never heard of this. It’s the largest federal block grant for affordable housing supply, and it really hasn’t been updated in a long time. And so what this bill has in it is expanding eligibility for these block programs to workforce income households. So it’s not just people with the lowest incomes. It updates sort of outdated limits that haven’t caught up with costs today. It exempts small scale projects from environmental mandates, and it gives local jurisdiction more time and more flexibility in how to deploy those funds. So if you invest or active in areas that use home funds, I think there are going to be more projects that actually make sense, which is good news. So the second thing is the CDBG public land database. First change here is that basically communities that receive these kinds of grants, they need to maintain a searchable database of undeveloped government-owned land.
It’s like this sort of a prospecting tool or discovery tool for developers. It’s an interesting idea. I’m not sure it’s going to make a huge differences. Developers build in popular spots and any developer worth their weight should already know where undeveloped land is in popular spots, but maybe it will help. The second thing is that communities can now direct up to 20% of the funds towards affordable housing construction specifically, so I do think that could help housing supply as well. So those are the two bigger ones here. There are a couple other things like regional housing planning grants. There are some changes and expansion to the Section 504 home replant program. A lot of stuff like that, that if you operate in a rural area, you’re going to want to dig into. I’m not going to get into more detail now, but if you’re in rural markets, go check out this Title II of the new Act, because there’s a lot of interesting stuff in there.
With that though, I want to move on to Title III, which is my sleeper for my favorite part of this bill, but we do have to take a quick break. We’ll get to that right after this.
Welcome back to On The Market. I’m Dave Meyer going through the new bipartisan bill that just passed the House of Representatives that could really reshape housing supply in the United States. We’re going through the bill right now. We’ve gone through Title one and two. Now, let’s move on to Title III, which is manufactured housing and affordable finance. I got to say, I think this is kind of the sleeper section of the bill. I really like this stuff. Basically, they’re redefining what a manufactured home is to include housing built without a permanent chassis. This has been a problem for a while. Basically, currently, it is hard to get a loan for some manufactured homes, just based on the definition. This change could mean that modular and factory built homes, which I should say are typically 20 or 30% cheaper to build than things that are built on site.
Those types of homes now can get financing from HUD, which will make them much more attractive and will make it easier for these types of deals to pencil for developers or people who want to build homes. I like this because this financing barrier has been the main thing, I think, holding back factory built housing. Again, it could be 20, 30, maybe even more percent cheaper to build these kinds of homes. This is the kind of innovation that we need in the United States right now. I have not seen anything, maybe 3D printing housing. I’ve not seen a lot of ideas that will bring down construction onsite doing these infill projects, but we already know that pre-manufactured housing is at least 20 or 30% cheaper. And so if you make that more accessible, that could bring down overall construction costs. So I do really like this.
There’s one other provision in this title that makes it easier for people to get actually mortgages on really cheap houses. It’s kind of this weird thing, but it’s kind of hard to get a mortgage under $100,000. They’re opening that back up, which will help in certain parts of the country, probably the Midwest. Most people are probably jealous that they even have that problem of trying to find a mortgage for house under $100,000. But anyway, that is title three. We’re going to move quickly through Title IV, which is borrow and family protections. Basically, it’s mostly consumer protection and veteran benefits. Really important stuff, great policy, but lower direct impact for most investors. Number five, housing provider oversight. This requires the HUD secretary testify before Congress annually. Housing agencies are going to have more oversight. So good stuff, again, not going to directly impact any of us here that much.
So we’re going to skip over that and go to Title VI, the last one, community banking. I know banking regulation sounds dry, but if you’re buying rentals or doing development, this stuff matters. I mean, you hear me, Henry, James, Kathy talk about it all the time. Community banks are a really powerful tool in financing, and this is going to hopefully expand access to community banks. One of the provisions is basically bank exam relief and offers some flexibility on deposit requirements. Basically, if your community bank qualifies, there’s going to be less regulation and red tape, and they will be able to lend more on real estate projects. The other thing that they’re introducing here is that new bank charters are going to be streamlined. So hopefully, that means we’ll get new regional and local banks that has not been happening a lot recently. Basically, there’s been a lot of consolidation in the lending industry.
And so this provision actually is encouraging more local banks. I’m not an expert on that, so I don’t know if that’s going to happen, but I like the idea of trying to encourage local competition because local and community banks do provide a really positive role for real estate investors and homeowners in most markets. So bottom line here on Title VI, anything that makes community banks healthier, more willing to lend, I think is good for our community and for housing supply in general. So I like this as well. So that’s what’s in the bill. There’s plenty more. Like I said, there’s 37 different provisions. I covered about 10 of them that I think are important. Go check it out if you want to learn the rest. But before I give you some other thoughts on what’s going on here, I want to just also talk about what’s not in the bill because a lot about housing policy has been discussed recently, and not everything that’s been in the news is in the bill.
Notably, there is no ban on institutional investors. Trump signed an executive order three weeks ago targeting Wall Street buyers of single family homes. This bill doesn’t include any provisions formalizing that ban, so we really don’t know if and how that will work. The second thing I think that’s really important is that there’s not new federal funding for any of these programs, right? This is policy reform. It’s not like the government is all of a saying we’re investing billions and billions and billions of dollars into new construction or anything like that. It’s policy reform that will hopefully help. The idea is that it will help local jurisdictions and private investors and private individuals create new supply without the government actually going out and funding that itself. There’s also no rent control in here. There is no mortgage rate relief ideas in here. This is really focusing on housing supply.
This is a fundamentally supply side bill, and I think that’s really important to investors. The philosophy here seems to be remove barriers, modernize programs, and let the market build more. That’s good. I did a whole episode recently, I think it was like two or three weeks ago, about demand side policy. I was saying that Trump and his administration have introduced a lot of ideas to help housing affordability, but it was almost entirely demand side, meaning that it helps buyers buy more homes. But my point in that episode was that, yes, demand side stuff can help, but if you don’t pair that with supply side fixes, it actually makes the problem worse, right? Because you’re inducing more demand without increasing supply that pushes prices up. So in my opinion, supply side is what fixes things long term, and that’s why I like a lot of the ideas in this bill.
I am not saying this is going to fix things overnight. It will not. It’s going to take a while and there are probably more policy changes that need to happen as well, but I like the idea that Congress is passing bipartisan laws that are focused on supply issues in the housing market. That is what fixes things long term. Demand side help can be important during a crisis. It can be important for certain demographics and people in our country, but those are bandaids without a supply fix. And so that’s why I’m excited because we’re finally talking about supply side fixes. All right. We got to turn our attention now to what this means for investors, but we got to take one more quick break. We’ll be right back.
Welcome back to On The Market. I’m Dave Meyer talking about the new bipartisan housing bill making its way through Congress. We have talked about what’s in the bill, what’s not in the bill, and now let’s talk a little bit about what this means for investors. And I want to sort of get the elephant in the room out of the way because one of the main reasons we have an affordability crisis in this country is because people, they say they want more housing, but they don’t actually want more housing. This is this whole idea of NIMBYism, not in my backyard. Most people know that when you suppress supply, you stop people from building, you get more appreciation. And so they stop multifamily development or more houses from being built in their neighborhoods because it keeps their home prices up and increases appreciation. On the other hand, when there is more supply, that can slow down appreciation and a lot of homeowners don’t like that.
Look at Austin, Texas, for example. They have a supply glut and prices are falling because of it, and a lot of homeowners don’t want that. And I bet there are some investors out there who don’t want more supply because they want rapid appreciation or they don’t want their home values, property values to sink. But I’m just going to tell you, I believe that more housing supply is a good thing for investors, for homeowners, for everyone. And I’m going to tell you why. First, it’s just good for our country. Homeownership has long been part of the American dream. It is an important component of building wealth and stability for your family. It’s provides security and predictability to families. And I just believe that homeownership should be within reach to average Americans, not just wealthy people or investors, which is what the housing market has become of late.
We can measure this in the United States. The average person in the United States cannot afford the average price home, and I think that’s a problem. The second thing is a more predictable market. I believe as an investor is a better market. Supply constraints create unpredictable conditions like we’ve seen the last few years. We get huge appreciation. Now we have a long contraction. Housing, ideally, should be more stable. I say this all the time. I would love to get back to a place where we could just count on the housing market going up close to the pace of inflation every year, two, three, 4%. I think better balance between supply and demand would get us there, and that makes better conditions as a real estate investor. For those of us who are just trying to build financial freedom over the long run, that’s a market we can definitely work with.
Third, more supply makes building a portfolio easier. This would lower entry points and help grow portfolios. It is not just homeowners who are struggling with affordability right now, but new investors trying to get into the game, people who want to add to their portfolio are also struggling to get into the market and more supply should help the market become more affordable. Fourth reason, real estate worked even before there was a housing shortage, right? We don’t need this. I get some homeowners think that they need to constrain supply for their home to have value. But as real estate investors, we don’t need that. We don’t need homeowners to be squeezed. We don’t need families to be rent burdened. We don’t need first-time home buyers to be squeezed out of the market. We just don’t need it. Real estate can and should be a profitable business that adds value to our society without keeping the housing supply scarce.
This business worked long before there was a housing shortage and it will work again. I think we’ll work better if supply and demand were better balanced. The last thing I’ll say about adding supply and why I think this is such a good idea is because it allows us as real estate investors to play a positive role in communities. We need more housing in this country. Whether you believe it’s three million short or seven million short, we need more housing. And if this bill passes or something similar or just in general, it may get easier for you, literally you as a real estate investor, to provide that value to your community. And I love that. You could help solve a problem in your community and build a great business at the same time. To me, that is a win-win situation. Now, some people may disagree, but as you can tell, I really think that we need more supply in the United States and I’m standing by it.
With that said though, let’s talk about what some of these provisions actually mean for investors on the ground. First, I’ll say for anyone who’s thinking about development or adding value, adding capacity, there’s a lot of good stuff in here. From the NEPA streamlining, these ideas behind pattern book programs, loan limit updates for FHA multifamily, these ideas could meaningfully reduce your timelines and expand what you can build. More things will start to pencil. So I personally, if you’re interested in development, I dig into this stuff right now. See how these ideas, even though they’re not finalized, how they might apply in your market. I think if you can get a jumpstart on some of these development ideas, you could have an advantage in your market. So I would definitely check that out. The second thing is I’m personally really interested to see what happens with the manufactured homes.
I need to learn more about this, but I just love the concept of being able to mass manufacture housing at 20 or 30% below other costs and use that either for urban infill or building developments, whatever it is, I’m going to look a lot into that and I’ll share with you what I learned, but I just think that’s another thing. If you are a developer or value add investor, you should be looking at. For buy and hold investors, I think there’s a couple things. One, can you work with a developer and do some build to rent? Because if development is getting easier, like we were just talking about, but you’re not a developer, built to rent could be a good option because you might find people who want to build and develop, but don’t want to hold and operate properties. So I think that’s going to be a really interesting opportunity.
We’ve seen institutional investors doing a lot of build for rent. For the last couple years, it makes more sense for them financially, but I think this could be more available to small and medium size investors with some of these provisions to work with small and medium sized developers as well. The second thing is when you’re underwriting deals, I think you have to really watch supply growth carefully. Now, we don’t know if this bill is really going to lead to an explosion of construction and supply. I think it will take some time. I don’t think it’s going to happen overnight. It’s probably going to take years. But it’s something that I talk about a lot with just people when I’m traveling around and talking to people. I think everyone when they’re evaluating markets and underwriting deals, they’re all looking at demand side. How many people are moving there?
How many jobs are there? That’s all important and good. But supply side matters a lot. Ask anyone in Austin, Texas. Ask anyone in Phoenix right now, right? Ask anyone in Florida right now. When there is a lot of supply that comes online quickly, it can lead to a contraction in the market or slower growth times. Now, I’m not saying that you can’t buy or operate in areas where supply is getting added. I just made a strong argument that I think supplies should be added. I just want to say that you need to track it carefully to try and make sure that you are underwriting appropriately. If you are going to buy something that’s next to a new housing development, you probably shouldn’t expect a lot of appreciation in the next couple of years because there’s going to be a lot of supply coming online. That is okay, but you need to underwrite for it and therefore pay less for that asset because it’s not going to perform the same.
In a lot of markets in the last couple of years, it’s been easy to ignore supply side because there’s been so much demand, but because we’re in a correction right now, a contraction in the market, and because we might see more supply, I think this is going to be more and more important and something that you should focus on in your underwriting. The other two things that I will mention are watch what happens with this institutional investor policy. It’s not in here. I personally don’t think it’s going to amount to much, but it will matter. If there is a real ban on institutional investors buying single family homes, I think it’s going to create sort of this sweet spot for small and medium size investors who want to do buy and hold. We’ll obviously cover that on a future episode if it actually does take shape, but it’s something I just wanted to mention because it’s not in here, but it would matter.
And then the last thing I’ll just say is look at your funding options. If you are developing or working in rural areas, if you’re a veteran, if you’re looking in low income areas, there are more and more funding options available. Also, look to your community banks. They might be able to introduce new programs. They might have higher limits. They might have new first-time home buyer programs because of these policies. So even if you’ve done your research in the past, go do it again. Look through different funding options for your next deal if this bill goes into place because there might be better options for you. There’s a lot in here that is designed to do just that. All right, so those are my feelings about the bill. Obviously, we’ll learn more if it actually gets passed and we can talk about some of the provisions as we get more details, but these are the big high level things that are in the bill.
And overall, I like what I see here. Supply side policy is what is needed. It is not a silver bullet. It is not going to help immediately. There is still a lot of work to do to restore housing supply in the United States, but I think there are worthy ideas here that are a step in the right direction. And although we don’t know the exact impact, personally, I’m just happy to see the government talking about supply side solutions to the housing market, and maybe these will help us move in that direction and will lead to other policy changes or other ideas that can really help accelerate supply side growth in the housing market. The other thing I like about this is that it allows us as real estate investors to build successful businesses while also helping to address a major problem in our economy and help meet the needs of our community.
And like I always say, that’s the win-win type of scenarios that we should be looking to create as real estate investors. So hopefully this will help us all do that. That’s what we got for you today on On The Market. I’m Dave Meyer. Thank you all so much for listening. If you have any questions about this, you can always reach out to me on BiggerPockets or on Instagram. And if you thought this was helpful, share it with a friend, give us a like. We always appreciate it. Thanks again. We’ll see you next time.

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].



Source link


The U.S. labor market began 2026 at a surprisingly strong pace, while newly released benchmark revisions show that job growth in 2025 was considerably weaker than previously reported. Nonfarm payrolls increased by 130,000 jobs in January, and the unemployment rate edged down to 4.3%. January’s job gains were concentrated on health care, social assistance, and construction, while federal government and financial activities experienced job losses.

The establishment survey data released today were benchmarked to reflect comprehensive counts of payroll jobs for March 2025. This annual benchmark process results in revisions to seasonally adjusted data from January 2021 forward. The updated figures show the labor market added only 181,000 jobs in 2025, down sharply from the previously reported 584,000. The revised job gains for 2025 are far fewer than the 1.46 million jobs added in 2024. Excluding recession years (2008, 2009, and 2020), 2025 now stands as the weakest year of employment growth since 2003.

Wage growth was unchanged in January, with average hourly earnings rising 3.7% year-over-year. This pace is 0.3 percentage points lower than a year ago. Importantly, wage growth has been outpacing inflation for nearly two years, which typically occurs as productivity increases.

National Employment

According to Employment Situation Summary reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 130,000 in January, marking the strongest monthly gain since December 2024.

The unemployment rate edged down to 4.3% in January, following 4.4% in December. Over the month, the number of persons unemployed declined by 141,000, while the number of persons employed increased by 528,000.

Meanwhile, the labor force participation rate—the proportion of the population either looking for a job or already holding a job—edged up 0.1 percentage points to 62.5%. This remains below its pre-pandemic level of 63.3% recorded at the beginning of 2020. Among prime working-age individuals (aged 25 to 54), the participation rate rose to 84.1%, the highest level since 2001, reflecting strong engagement in the core workforce.

In January, industry trends remained mixed. Health care added 82,000 jobs in January, and social assistance increased by 42,000. In contrast, federal government jobs declined by 34,000 and financial activities shed 22,000 jobs.

Construction Employment

Employment in the overall construction sector increased by 33,000 jobs in January, after an upwardly revised loss of 4,000 in December. Within the industry, residential construction added 5,900 jobs, while non-residential construction added 27,900 positions. Overall construction employment was essentially flat in 2025, compared with a gain of 176,000 jobs in 2024.

Residential construction employment now stands at 3.3 million in January, including 952,000 workers employed by builders and remodelers and nearly 2.4 million residential specialty trade contractors.

The six-month moving average of job gains for residential construction remains negative, at a loss of 2,083 per month, reflecting losses in three of the past six months. Over the last 12 months, residential construction has seen a net loss of 43,600 jobs, marking the eleventh consecutive annual decline and the longest stretch of annual losses since the Great Recession. Since the low point following the Great Recession, residential construction has gained 1,312,900 positions.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .

Pin It