Author

realtykast_fmyriy

Browsing


Residential building material prices rose at a slower rate in January, according to the latest Producer Price Index release from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This was the first decline in the rate of price growth since April of last year. Metal products continue to experience price increases, while specific wood products are showing declines in prices.

The Producer Price Index for final demand increased 0.5% in January, after rising 0.4% in December. The January increase in final demand is linked directly to final demand services, which saw prices rise 0.8% in January. The index for final demand goods decreased 0.3% in January.

The price index for inputs to new residential construction rose 0.7% in January and was up 3.3% from last year. The price of goods used in new residential construction was up 0.9% over the month and 2.4% from last year. Meanwhile, the price for services was up 0.3% over the month and up 4.7% from last year.

Input Goods

The goods component has a larger importance to the inputs to residential construction price index, representing around 60%. On a monthly basis, the price of input goods to new residential construction was up 0.9% in January.

The input goods to residential construction index can be further broken down into two separate components, one measuring energy inputs with the other measuring remaining goods. The latter of these two components simply represents building materials used in residential construction, which makes up around 93% of the goods index.

Energy input prices fell 0.9% in January and were 10.3% lower than one year ago. Building material prices were up 1.0% in January and up 3.3% compared to one year ago, marking the lowest year-over-year price change since July of last year.

The largest year-over-year price increases continue to show in metal products. Topping the list in January was metal molding and trim, with prices up 48.3% from last year. One product that has seen rapid price growth acceleration over the past few months has been nonferrous metal and cable with prices up 19.7%. Price declines for materials over the year are concentrated among wood products with prices for particleboard and fiberboard down 24.4%, treated wood products down 5.0%, and softwood lumber down 3.3%.

Input Services

Prices for service inputs to residential construction reported an increase of 0.3% in January. On a year-over-year basis, service input prices were up 4.7%. The price index for service inputs to residential construction can be broken out into three separate components: a trade services component, a transportation and warehousing services component, and a services excluding trade, transportation, and warehousing component (other services).

The most significant component is trade services (around 60%), followed by other services (around 29%), and finally transportation and warehousing services (around 11%). The largest component, trade services, was up 7.1% from a year ago. The transportation and warehousing services rose 2.0%, while prices for other services were up 1.1% over the year.

Expanded Inputs to New Construction

Within the PPI that BLS publishes, new experimental data was recently published regarding inputs to new construction. The data expands existing inputs to industry indexes by incorporating import prices with prices for domestically produced goods and services. With this additional data, users can track how industry input costs are changing among domestically produced products and imported products. This data focuses on new construction, but the complete dataset includes indices across numerous industries that can be found here on BLS website. 

New construction input prices are primarily influenced by domestically produced goods and services, with domestic products accounting for 90% of the weight of the industry index for new construction. Imported goods make up the remaining 10% of the index.  

The latest available data, for November 2025, showed that domestically produced goods continue to have faster price growth compared to imported goods used in new construction. On a year-over-year basis, the index for domestic goods increased 3.0%, while prices for imported goods have fallen 3.0%.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .



Designer: Erica Lugbill of Lugbill Designs
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
Size: 300 square feet; (28 square meters) 15 by 20 feet

Homeowners’ request. “The primary bedroom needed a refresh,” says designer Erica Lugbill. “What wasn’t working was a lack of architectural character and a sense that the room hadn’t quite been finished. The homeowners wanted something moodier and more layered, with real dimension on the walls and ceiling. The vision centered on bringing in darker accents, custom built-ins, thoughtful lighting and the kind of details — molding, paneling, upholstery — that make a bedroom provide a true sense of calm, rather than just a place to sleep.”

Layered details. “The layering in this room starts at the ceiling,” Lugbill says. “We introduced custom crown molding and painted the entire ceiling — molding included — in Sherwin-Williams Tricorn Black, a warm black that anchors the space and draws the eye upward in an unexpected way. A complementary color — Sherwin-Williams Iron Ore — carries into the TV built-in, giving the cabinetry a moody, furniture-like quality.

“On the bed wall, a custom upholstered headboard and footboard are paired with proposed 2-inch fluted wall panels that add tactile depth and a quiet sophistication. The height of the headboard adds a dramatic focal point. The window treatments are a ripplefold drapery in a soft, light-blocking panel on a track that moves beautifully and keeps the palette calm and cohesive. Underfoot, the bedroom is grounded by a plush wool rug.”

Other special features. “Opal bedside pendants replace traditional table lamps, freeing up surface space and adding a sculptural lighting element on either side of the bed,” Lugbill says. “The ceiling fan was chosen for its sleek profile — functional without sacrificing the room’s elevated aesthetic. A dark navy faux Belgian linen dresser, a bedside table in charcoal gray oak with Bianco Lilac marble and a round side table in white-and-gray bone round out the furniture, each chosen to layer material and finish without competing.”

Designer tip. “Paint your ceiling dark and don’t stop at the crown molding,” Lugbill says. “One of the most impactful moves we made in this primary bedroom was painting the ceiling black. Homeowners often treat the ceiling as an afterthought, defaulting to white. But a dark ceiling creates intimacy, adds architectural drama and makes every other element in the room feel more grounded. It’s a commitment, but it’s one of those decisions that immediately elevates a space from pretty to truly designed. If you’re nervous, start with a small room, but once you see it you won’t look back.”



This article was originally published by a www.houzz.com . Read the Original article here. .


Any guesses which cities are at the top of RentCafé’s hottest rental markets at the start of 2026? Miami? Phoenix? Austin?

Try Cincinnati, Atlanta, and Minneapolis. They indicate a quiet shift toward affordable, job-rich metros that small investors can also buy into and possibly cash flow from. While the coasts boast luxury living and high-end jobs, early data indicate that the best opportunities for workers and investors over the next few years could lie in the Midwest and interior South.

What RentCafé’s New Rankings Really Show—and What They Don’t

RentCafé based its ranking system on renter behavior on its platform. To collate the list that gauges renter demand, the site examined four specific areas and ranked markets accordingly: 

  • Apartment availability
  • Favorited listings
  • Saved searches
  • Page views

Cincinnati rose to the top spot on the back of some impressive stats. The number of apartments favored by prospective renters jumped 81% year over year, while saved searches climbed 14% by late 2025, and page views climbed 3%. Atlanta’s second-place spot was driven mostly by prospective renters from New York and across Georgia, suggesting ongoing in-migration from pricier markets.

Minneapolis had been a previous RentCafé top spot holder, and at the time the data was collected, favorited listings were up 29% year over year, fifth for total saved searches and ninth for page views. However, this was collected before the ICE immigration crackdown in the city, which caused unrest and affected rental real estate occupancy and the pace of new builds, according to reports in the Star Tribune and Multifamily Dive.

Overall, RentCafé’s report showed that the Midwest accounted for 11 spots and the South accounted for 10 spots on its annual list, reflecting primarily affordability, livability, and the amenities available in rentals and surrounding areas in traditional blue-collar cities like Minneapolis, Cleveland, and Detroit, as well as in Western markets like Santa Ana, California. 

That’s not to say that high-demand big metros like Dallas, New York, Chicago, and Miami are flagging. In fact, even with 500,000 new apartments coming to those areas, data shows that finding a vacancy there remains a challenge.

Why Middle America Is Surging

The affordability crisis is at the crux of Americans’ need to move to cheaper markets. According to The Wall Street Journal, overall living expenses in several Midwest metros are about 8.5% under the U.S. average. 

A WSJ/Realtor.com Emerging Housing Markets Index for winter 2026 found that Midwest markets with reputable universities, strong medical infrastructure, and manufacturing hubs were particularly resilient. Matching those attributes with affordability, median home prices were largely between $240,000 and $400,000, and the cost of living was below national norms.

According to a recent LendingTree study, Americans are paying “hundreds of extra dollars in rent”—about 40% more for one- and two-bedroom apartments—than even five years ago, while wages have not kept pace, putting a tremendous squeeze on renters and ushering a migration to more affordable cities.

The housing industry has responded by bringing thousands of new apartments to the rental market, increasing residential construction starts 5.2% month over month to 1.428 million units as of July 2025, with new apartment construction up by more than 50% across two months in mid-2025, according to the Commerce Department’s Census Bureau data, as quoted by Reuters.

Still a Chronic Shortage of Housing

The National Apartment Association and the National Multi-Family Housing Council released a joint statement on the eve of President Trump’s State of the Union address, citing the need for more housing to ease the affordability crisis, saying:

“Neither one speech nor one single federal policy is going to solve the housing affordability challenges we face. Instead, alleviating the housing shortage requires a sustained commitment to building housing of all types, backed by public and private investment, through public-private partnerships and freed from outdated rules that slow construction and drive up costs. It also requires the administration to lean into what we know works—building more housing—and resist repeating mistakes of the past.”

Reading the Data for Smaller Investors

Clearly, cheaper, more affordable markets around employment hubs are an essential play for smaller investors seeking stable rental income. A recent report from Bank of America showed that the exodus of residents from high-cost areas such as Los Angeles and New York to smaller Southern cities is fueling out-of-state migration, concluding that “affordability and climate remain the two biggest magnets—and the two biggest push factors.”

‘The Straw That Breaks the Camel’s Back’

Minneapolis presents a cautionary tale for investors. In the turbulent political climate, cities with high immigrant populations that face deportation drives by ICE could have severe repercussions for landlords. 

Chris Nebenzahl, vice president of rental research at John Burns Research and Consulting, told Multifamily Dive that in some buildings, immigration enforcement “could be the straw that breaks the camel’s back,” particularly for owners facing loans originated in 2021 that are coming due amid higher vacancies and lower rent rolls.

Nebenzahl added that the combination of past supply issues and now a demand shock from immigration policy “is really putting some folks in a bit of a lurch from an occupancy perspective.” Other landlords in Florida and Texas told the outlet that they have also seen detrimental effects on leasing and occupancy when ICE enforcement intensity is particularly high.

It is still too early, amid continuing ICE raids, to see how long it takes for leasing activity to return to previous levels after enforcement activity in an area rescinds.

Final Thoughts

The rental market remains highly fluid in the U.S., with the shifting economic climate having a pronounced effect on rental activity, particularly with the advent of remote work, which means many people are less likely to stay in an expensive city for a job. There has been a shift toward more affordable, climate-friendly areas. 

RentCafé’s list is interesting because it’s not one documented after the fact but one based largely on online activity, which is an indicator of future movement. That’s why it’s good to combine RentCafé data with rent growth data to see how interest translates into action.

According to research firm Arbor Realty Trust, Minneapolis finished 2025 as the second-strongest multifamily rent growth market in the country, with 2% growth and an average rent of about $1,497 per unit. 

For small landlords, the play is simple: Follow the money. Larger apartment buildings are being built at a clip, but not everyone wants to live in a building with hundreds of other people.

Consequently, single-family rental houses in these markets are coveted, according to National Mortgage Professional, which reports that just 13.7% of single-family rentals are occupied by renters—a decade low. Finding pockets of available single-family and small multifamily properties in these markets should ensure strong demand.



Source link


Four rental properties by age 40? It’s possible, and if you can achieve it, your financial future will change forever. Henry and I have done it—both of us were able to buy four rental properties before our forties, and not only will it allow us to retire early, but our traditional retirement will be much wealthier.

So, how do you start? This is exactly how to buy four rental properties by age 40, step by step. (And don’t worry if you’re over 40, you can use the same steps.)

We’ll start with an easy property that many new investors can qualify for (with a bit of work), then a property with a huge upside for your net worth. Next, a cash-flowing investment that can help you have more rental income, and finally—where it all comes together—an investment property that you have expertise in.

If you can acquire all four rental properties, your life and the life of your family could be changed forever as you create serious equity, grow cash flow, and leave a legacy behind.

Four rentals by 40? This is exactly how it’s done.

Dave:
Four rentals by 40 years old. That’s all you need to cement a comfortable retirement or even retire early. If you can achieve this, you’ll be significantly wealthier, and I’m talking millions of dollars wealthier than the average American. Plus, you’ll have passive income to support yourself in retirement instead of just a social security check. Getting to four rentals is a huge deal, and today I’m going to share the four-step plan anyone can use to build a small but powerful rental portfolio that accelerates their timeline to retirement, or at least makes them a heck of a lot richer. In the example I’m sharing today, buying only four rental properties, even if you stop there and do nothing else, would increase your net worth by $3.3 million by the time you’re ready to retire. And if you’re already 40 or you’re over 40, don’t worry, you can follow the same steps and map out your own retirement timeline using the walkthrough I’m going to share with you today.
So you don’t need a dozen properties. All you need is four. This is how you get there.
What’s up everyone? I’m Dave Meyer, Chief Investment Officer at BiggerPockets. Today on the show, I’m showing you how acquiring only four rental properties by age 40 can completely transform your financial trajectory. We’re going to dive right in with an example of how this works step by step. And this is a plan almost anyone can follow. And actually, it’s pretty similar to the types of properties and the timeline I personally followed on my own journey to financial freedom. And I’m sure there are some people out there listening to this who want to scale all the way up to dozens or even hundreds of properties, which is cool if you want to do that. But I think four properties gets most people where they want to go by retirement. So we’re just going to talk through the first four steps. And if you want to keep growing from there, great.
But these four steps will set you up for a successful career whether you want to go big or not. All right, let’s jump into our first property. My recommendation for almost everyone out there is to buy an owner-occupied property for your first deal. The idea behind this first deal is not to hit a home run or to get a huge amount of cash flow. The idea here is to set yourself up so that you’re saving additional money and you’re starting to build equity in your home. And you’re going to use those two things, your increased savings and the equity that you build in this first deal to go buy your second deal, your third deal, and your fourth deal. So don’t think that you’re going to have to save up a new down payment for each of these four properties. Each deal that you do should help your next deal become easier.
So again, for this first deal, you’re going to want to do owner occupied. This is going to give you access to better financing. Loans where you can put as little as 3.5% down, you’re going to get better interest rates, and it’s just the easiest way to get into the game. Now, there are generally two different types of owner-occupied deals that you can consider. The first and largely the most popular is known as house hacking. This is where you buy either a single family home, live in one bedroom and rent out the other bedrooms to roommates. That’s an option for people. Some people don’t want to live with roommates. So the other option is to buy a small multifamily. This is either a two unit, a three unit, or a four unit property. You live in one, and then you rent out the others. And the key is here, you got to stop at four because if you buy something bigger than four, you lose that owner-occupied financing, which is what you really need on this first deal.
So I recommend to most people if you can find them and if they’re available in your area, look for a duplex or a triplex and invest in that, live in one unit and then rent out the others. The benefit of doing this, again, is that you don’t necessarily need to cash flow. If you can find a cash flowing house hack, that’s great. But your key here is to save money. If you buy a house hack, you live in it, and for example, you spend $500 less per month on housing, that’s a win. Even if you’re coming out of pocket a couple hundred bucks a month for your housing, as long as it’s less and significantly less than what you were paying in rent, that’s still a win. You’re going to use that saved up money for your next property. It also is going to help you learn the business of being a landlord and a real estate investor.
And if you’re doing it right and you’re buying the right kind of deals, you’ll be building equity as the value of your property increases over time. That equity is something you can tap for your second, your third, or your fourth deals. So those are the basics of house hacking, but I also want you to remember, a house hack doesn’t have to be this two to four unit. It doesn’t even have to be a single family home. With roommates, you can do it by adding an ADU or a mother-in-law suite. Where I live, a really popular thing to do is people buy split level homes. They do a lockoff into the basement and they turn their single family into two units. That’s not available to everyone, but the point here is get creative. There are ways to make house hacking work that might not appear immediately obvious on Zillow, and often those are the best deals.
So that’s it for step one. Save up your money, invest in an owner-occupied strategy so you get that owner-occupied financing. Find a deal that’s going to allow you to save money and build equity that you can invest in your next deal. And being on site is a great opportunity to get good at being a real estate investor. Get good at working with tenants, get good at property management. Those are the three goals of step one. So let’s walk through an example here. Let’s just imagine that you’re 30 years old, you’re going to do this house hacking strategy, and you find a home for $400,000. In some markets, it’ll be cheaper, some will be more, but that’s the median price home in the US today. Now, if you get this owner-occupied financing that I’ve been talking about using 3.5% down, your down payment is only going to be $14,000.
That is enough. Like I said, if you save $20,000 up for this first deal, you’ll still have some money for closing costs and for cash reserve. So this is a realistic deal. Now, I look at deals all the time, and for deals like this, depending on the market you’re in, it is realistic to believe that you could save $500, maybe more, $700, $800 in some examples, off of what you would be paying in rent. So now, as opposed to renting, you are saving $500 per month in cash. On top of that, you’re also getting amortization, you’re getting tax benefits, you’re getting appreciation, but just the cash savings alone is $6,000 per year. So if you save that after three years, you’re going to have close to $20,000 saved. That’s enough to just do this deal again. So as you can see, buying the first deal and doing that right leads to the second deal.
And the second deal will lead to the third and the third will lead to the fourth. But the key is to find a good deal that’s going to build you that equity and help you save that money. So that’s the first deal. But the second property is where things really start to ramp up and take you from a homeowner to a real investor, which has huge impacts on your net worth and retirement timeline. We’re going to talk about the second deal that you should be looking for and how that’s different from your first one, but we do have to take a quick break. We’ll be right back.
Welcome back to the BiggerPockets Podcast. I’m Dave Meyer giving you my step-by-step plan for getting four rentals by 40 years old. Before the break, we talked about your first deal being an owner-occupied house hack that allows you to save money and build equity so that you have enough money to go out and do this again. Now, property two is going to be a little bit different. Now that you have some experience and hopefully some money from house hacking, we’re going to look for a deal that has a little bit more meat on the bones, got a little bit more juice because we want to build equity. That’s the thing that’s going to build our net worth and really secure our retirement in the long run. Now, the way you do this is by finding what is known as a value add property. So this is finding a property that’s not in the best condition and doing some sort of renovation.
It doesn’t need to be a full burr. You don’t need to tear out all of the walls. This could be anything from a light cosmetic deal, or if you want to, you can do one of my personal favorite strategies. I call the slow burr. You could do a full gut rehab. That’s where there’s a lot of equity to be gained. But the point here is property two is going to be a value add project where you actually do a renovation on a property to build lots of equity. Now, depending on who you are, you should decide how intense of a renovation that you want. So if you don’t have any experience with renovations, I would look for something that’s more of a light cosmetic or a light rehab that’s something like renovating kitchens, painting, putting in new floors, but you’re not doing anything structural. You’re not moving walls, you’re not popping the top, you’re not doing anything like that.
Unless you have experience with renovations. If you have experience or work in construction or know someone who could help you with that process, you could do a bigger project. But for deal two, I would recommend most people stay on the lighter side of the renovation. It will reduce your risk and there’s still significant upside in these kinds of deals. The next thing that you need to look for in your deals are, one, in today’s market, you should be looking for deals that have been sitting on the market for 60 days or more. We are in a buyer’s market right now, which means that buyers have leverage. And if any seller has a property that’s been sitting on the market for 60 days or more, they’re going to probably be pretty motivated to negotiate with you. So look for those deals because that’s where you’re going to be able to buy below current comps and that’s going to give you even more equity throughout the course of your deal.
On top of just looking for things sitting on the market 60 days, I think two key things that you want to look for in your deals are areas where you think there is going to be rent growth, so where there’s going to be a lot of demand for renters, that is always helpful as a real estate investor. And the second is a place that’s in the path of progress. You don’t want to invest in a place where properties aren’t going to appreciate or there’s not going to be demand if you want to sell it. So look for places where people want to live, where the government is investing. Those are great ways to take your deals from a single or a double to a home run over the lifetime of your investment. So those are the things to look for in the deal. And just as a reminder, the goal of this deal is to build equity as much as you can and to get a cash flowing rental.
All right, so let me just give you an example of how this works. You go out and buy a property worth $300,000, then you’re going to need to put money into it. Let’s say you have a rehab budget of 50 grand, which is a generous budget, right? That’s enough to make significant improvements to a property. So your total all- in costs are going to be 350,000 for this deal. And what a lot of people do for a Bird property is take out what’s known as a hard money loan. These are loans that are designed specifically for these types of projects where you don’t just borrow the money to buy the property. You also borrow the money that you need to do the renovation. And oftentimes with a hard money loan, you can put as little as 10% down. So because your total costs are 350,000, you’re going to need $35,000 to get into this deal, which after a couple years of saving up your money from your first deal plus building equity, you should be able to do this within two, three, or maybe four years, you should have that much capital.
Now, you go into this deal, you buy it for 300 grand, you add value to it. After putting in 50 grand, hopefully this property is now worth, let’s just call it 450,000. So you put in 350, now it’s worth 450,000. And then know that might sound like magic, but it’s not. You can absolutely put 50 grand in and build $100,000 of equity. That happens all the time. That is a relatively normal type of return that you can expect on a good Bird deal. So you build that equity, which is great. Obviously, your net worth just went up, but the real magic of the Burr property is that you can take some of the equity that you built out and apply it to property number three. So you’re going to take out a new mortgage. You’re going to have to put 25% down, which is about $112,000.
You’re going to need to pay off your old mortgage, right? You still owe the hard money lender $315,000, but after those two things, you can take $20,000 out of this deal. So you only put 35 in, right? Remember? And now you’re pulling $20,000 out of this deal for your next deal. Now, some people want to do a perfect Burr where they can pull out 35,000. That might be possible. But even in this example, you’re pulling out 20,000 that you can go use for your next deal. You’re more than halfway to your next deal. That’s what’s so powerful about the Burr strategy. And on top of that, you should also have a cash flowing rental property at this time, right? Because the key is even after that refinance, you need to make sure that this deal is going to cashflow at least modestly. Doesn’t need to be tons of cashflow.
It doesn’t have to be the highest cash on cash return. Remember, the main goal of this deal was to build equity, which you have done, and to get at least breakeven, I would recommend three, 4% cash on cash return minimum for this kind of deal. Now, once you’ve done that, you have 20 grand already. You’re saving six grand a year from your house hack. Now you’re making, let’s call it $3,000 a year in cash flow from deal number two. And so in two years, you should be able to get deal number three, right? You have 20 grand in equity, plus you’re saving nine grand a year in cash flow. That will get you $38,000 in just two years. And this deal we just did only cost us $35,000. So in two years, you can get to deal number three. So that brings us to property number three.
And the goal of this property is to generate as much cash flow as you can. You still want to buy a great property. You don’t want to be buying something that’s never going to grow, but you want to prioritize cash flow and cash on cash return here over equity appreciation. So we’re not necessarily doing a Burr or a house hack here. We are trying to find a cash cow. So the way that we’re going to finance this is through the equity from our first two deals. Presuming both of those properties continue to appreciate at a modest rate of 3% per year, that’s about average, and you add that to the equity that you built in the Bird deal, that was a significant amount of money, plus you’re saving $800 a month. If you waited, let’s just say two years between your second deal and your third deal, you’re now 35 years old in our example, you should have, just from doing those first two deals, another $60 to $70,000 to invest, which is more than enough to invest in this third property.
Now, I know for some people, or if you watch a lot of social media, real estate content, you might think waiting two years for your next deal is a long time or waiting five years from your first to your third deal. I don’t actually think so. It took me six years to get to my third deal and three properties. I had eight units at that point, but it took me three years, and that has been totally fine. By 15 years of doing this, I have become financially independent. And so I promise you, you can follow this timeline. It can absolutely work. Your goal, remember, is to get to four properties by 40, and you’re already at three by 35 on this timeline. Now, there’s sometimes a trade-off between cashflow and appreciation, not always, and you honestly want to find a little bit with both. I personally never look for deals that just maximize cashflow.
You can buy something, maybe it’s in a D class neighborhood or a market that’s never going to grow. Maybe you can get a 12 or 15% cash on cash return in those markets. I don’t personally like those kind of deals. For me, I need to at least be able to believe that these deals are going to grow at least on average appreciation and that there’s still going to be good assets sometime in the future. They’re still in a desirable place where there’s going to be demand, but I am willing to give up buying in the best possible neighborhood in order to get my cash on cash return up to eight, ideally closer to 10% on this kind of deal. Now, if you have 70 grand to invest, which you should by this point of your investing journey, you should be able to buy something for about 300 grand.
Now, that’s not going to buy cash flow in every single market in the United States, but I think this deal is an example of a good time to go out of your current market unless you live in Western New York or the Northeast, parts of the Northeast or in the Midwest. If you live in some of those areas or even Tennessee, some areas in the South, you can buy a cashflowing duplex for like 250 grand or 300 grand. But if you don’t live in these markets, you can just invest in those markets. I know it sounds intimidating to invest long distance, but if you’ve done two deals at this point, you’ve already done a BER, you’ve already done a house hack. I promise you, you can invest long distance. I have done it. It is not that much harder. And in a lot of ways, it forces you to develop some of the skills and systems that are going to make you a better investor over the long run.
So I would personally not shy away from that. Once you’ve found a market where you can actually do this realistically, again, lots of places in the Midwest and the Southeast, some places in New York or in New Hampshire, places like that, this is definitely possible. The things I would personally target on this deal is an 8% cash on cash return or better after stabilization. Now, we’re not going to prioritize a big equity bump on this. We’re not going to do a big Burr project, but sometimes, and honestly, oftentimes in today’s day and age, you got to fix up the house a little bit. You got to throw some paint on there, put in some new floors, make a couple of improvements, and then once you have gotten rents up to fair market value, that’s when you need the 8% cash on cash return. So even if the rents today and the Zillow price don’t give you that 8% cash on cash return, that’s actually fine.
That’s quite normal. What you need to do, the job you have as an investor is to project out, what’s my cash on cash return going to be when I’m done fixing up this property? And if it’s 8% or better, that’s what I’d look for. Then I would look for at least two to three upsides on these deal because 8% cashflow is great, but you obviously want the deal to perform better and better over time. And so I like looking for areas where there’s likely to be rent growth if it’s in the path of progress or I also love places with zoning upside. Now, I just want to say one more thing before we go back to our example that there are a lot of markets in the Midwest that you can buy these kinds of deals, but I recommend looking for ones that still have good appreciation.
I said it before, but I want to reiterate here that as a real estate investor, you do not want to see your property values going down. So look for places like Milwaukee or Indianapolis or Grand Rapids or even Detroit over the last couple of years. These are markets that are growing and they have good, strong fundamentals, but they’re still really inexpensive. That’s what you want to look for. You don’t just want to find deals that are cheap because they’re cheap. A lot of times if they’re in a mediocre market and they’re cheap, it means that they’re probably not going to appreciate you’re going to miss out on a lot of the benefits that you should be getting from holding onto this property long term. So presuming that you find this, you get a $300,000 deal with an 8% cash on cash return. If we return back to our example, now we’re getting 750 a month from property number one because rents have been growing at 3% a year, 350 a month from property number two and 420 per month from property number three.
That is over $1,500 a month in tax advantage cashflow, which is closer to earning $2,000 per month like in a job that’s going to get fully taxed. Now you’re only five years into this, but hopefully you’re starting to see that these things start to compound. What is not a lot of cashflow in the beginning gets a little bit more and a little bit more and a little bit more. And it’s not just when you acquire new deals. Just by owning these properties, you’ve already gone from modest cash flow and deal number one to 750 a month on property number one. Now you’re up to 350 a month on a BER deal that was prioritizing equity growth over cashflow, but you’re still getting cashflow. And as you’ll see in our next property, the longer you hold this, every deal continues to get better. It’s not just about acquiring new properties, it’s about allowing every deal that you own to mature over time.
And just like wine or many other things, most deals continue to get better and better the longer you hold them. So now that we’ve done property number three, let’s move on to our fourth property that you should be targeting before the time you turn 40. We’re going to get to that, but first we have to take one quick break. We’ll be right back.
Welcome back to the BiggerPockets Podcast. I’m Dave Meyer. We’re going through how to get four rental properties by the time you’re 40 years old. All right, so now that you’ve done your first three properties, you’ve done your owner occupant, you’ve done the Burr, you’ve tried a cashflow play. Step four is to pick your fourth property. And for your fourth property, you can honestly just decide which of these things that you like doing. If you want to do another owner-occupied strategy, moving from house hack to house hack is a super powerful strategy. If you were comfortable doing a BER and like doing a value add, you can absolutely do that again. Or if you’re progressing through your investing career and kind of want to be hands off and want to buy in more turnkey kind of rental property that’s more focused on cash flow, you can absolutely do that too.
The great thing about building a portfolio over the course of six, eight years like this plan has you doing is that you have options now. You’ve built up enough equity. You have cash flow coming in that it’s easy to get more loans. You can repurpose equity from one of these first three deals into your next one, and that allows you to expand and build your portfolio in the way that you want. The key things to know though are that if you want to grow the most net worth, you got to focus on equity. So I would say either doing a house hack or more likely a BER, if you want to build that net worth as quickly as possible, if you want to do as little work as possible, which is a totally worthwhile goal, I would focus more on the sort of cash flowing deals.
And if you want to take the least amount of risk as possible, I would do another house hack. You refinance that first one into being a regular rental property, then do another house hack. Now for me, personally, if I was making this choice, I like the BER because I think it gives you a little bit of both, right? It allows you to build equity at the same time as you’re building cashflow. So to continue our example, let’s just assume I’m going to go out and do a BER again. This time I’m going to take a little bit of a bigger swing. I’m going to buy a property that needs renovation that’s $400,000. Remember, the first Burr we did was about 300 grand. We put 50K in. I’m buying something this time, 400K, taking a bigger swing by doing an $80,000 renovation. If I do a hard money loan at 10%, that means I’m going to have to put about $48,000 of equity into this deal, and we should have that two or three years after doing deal number three.
So again, you’re not necessarily having to put much more money into this. From the cash flow you’re building through deals one through three, plus the equity you’re building, you should be able to afford this deal about eight years after starting. So in our example, you’re about 38 years old at this point. So on this deal, you buy for 400, you put in 80, the ARV is going to be about 650, which is totally reasonable here. I think a lot of times a good rule of thumb is your equity growth should be about double your renovation costs. That’s an efficient deal when you’re doing a kind of Burr. So this is realistic that you can get your ARV up that high. And that means that even if you don’t refi any money out, like if you do four deals in stock, which is the plan that we are giving you here today.
So even if you don’t take money out to do another deal and you factor in your holding costs and the debt costs that you’re going to have to pay while you’re doing the renovation, you’re going to build about $120,000 in equity just from this deal alone. And hopefully by renovating your properties, you can drive up your rents and get an 8% cash on cash return, which I think is totally reasonable. That’s not like the highest end. I think that’s a realistic return you can generate. So from this fourth deal alone, you’re getting 120K in equity and an 8% cash on cash return, which means over $10,000 a year in cash flow. So those are the four steps. Those are the four deals that I would recommend anyone do if you want to get to four rental properties by 40 years old. Now, I understand that just doing these four deals and the numbers that I’ve been using so far may not seem like the most exciting thing in the world.
It may not sound like those people who are buying thousands of units on Instagram, but let me just take a minute here and explain how just these four deals will help you stack up against the average American. At age 30, when you start this, you’re saving $500 a month, you’re going to have a $400,000 home that’s appreciating rapidly. You’re getting amortization and you are getting huge tax benefits that will help you save more money to grow. By age 33, you now have your second property. You’re generating more than $10,000 a year in cashflow, and you have $119,000 of equity just from these two properties. Now, might take you two or three years to get to that next deal, but by the time you’re at age 35, your cash flow is now up to $16,000 a year and your equity value is 214,000. Then by the time you’re 40, you bought your fourth deal.
You’ve been holding onto it for two years. You have $30,000 in tax advantage cashflow. That’s more like earning $40,000 a year in your career. And your net worth just from these properties is up to a whopping $490,000. Your equity after 10 years, $490,000. Compare that to the median 40-year-old in the United States whose net worth is $76,000. So by buying these four properties alone in just 10 years, your net worth will be five times the median 40-year-old. And from there, the benefits only start to compound. By the time you reach a more traditional retirement age of 60, actually 65 in the United States here, but just by 60, now you’ll start paying off the mortgages. You’ll be done with property number one. Your cash flow is going to skyrocket at that point to $75,000 a year. Again, because of the tax advantages, that’s more like making $100,000 a year, and your net worth at 60 years old just from these properties will be $3.3 million.
This is the power of real estate. You don’t need to buy a lot of units. You need to buy them and hold on. As you can see, the benefits just continue to compound more and more and more. Like I said, you have a little over six grand in cashflow at age 60, but once you start paying these things off, it gets even better. At 63, it’s 8K a month. At 65, it’s 10K a month. At 69, it’s 13K a month in tax advantaged cashflow. Now, I know that seems like a long way away, but this is a much better recipe for retirement than anything else out there. I don’t know anything, including a 401k that could come even close to touching this in terms of how much passive income it generates and the net worth that you generate. So if you’re out there looking for a way to build wealth, to pursue financial freedom, this is the exact plan I would follow.
It’s very similar to the plan I did for the first eight years. Now, of course, this is just an example. I don’t know if it’s going to take you two years between deals or three years between deals, but this rough outline can get you to a successful retirement. And of course, I did all this in this example, four properties in just eight years. If you want to keep going after that, by all means, you should. You have 20 years of working potentially to keep building that portfolio, build more cash flow, build more net worth, but for the average American, just four deals can be completely life changing. As you can see, building more, more and more units, it can help, but it’s not necessarily. Personally, I like to keep my portfolio relatively small because it’s enough for me to comfortably retire without having to add any additional work or stress to my life.
To me, that’s the beauty of real estate investing, that there’s disproportionate benefits for the amount of work that you have to put in, especially over the long term. And it’s also something that so many Americans can do. They just haven’t taken the steps to try. But as we’ve shown you in today’s episode, you can start with as little as $20,000 and build a massive portfolio worth millions of dollars starting in your 30s or your 40s. Hopefully, this gives you a game plan that you can follow in pursuing financial freedom. If you want to learn more about any of these topics, dive deep into how to be a great house hacker, how to pull off a great Burr, make sure to subscribe to the BiggerPockets YouTube channel. Thank you all so much for watching. We’ll see you next time.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].



Source link





This article was originally published by a
www.houzz.com . Read the Original article here. .


Want to finally buy a rental property in 2026? You’ve listened to the podcast. You’ve read the books. But what’s the best way to actually start? Today, we’re pulling back the curtain and sharing a beginner-friendly strategy that gives you a bit of everything—cash flow, appreciation, loan paydown, AND tax benefits!

Welcome to another Rookie Reply! We’re back with more questions from the BiggerPockets Forums. First, we’ll hear from someone who knows plenty about real estate investing but needs a clearer roadmap for getting started and scaling their real estate portfolio. Ashley and Tony share a rookie-friendly investing strategy that will help them not only buy their first deal but also get a head start on building serious wealth!

Another rookie has saved a large amount of money and is considering buying their first property in cash. But should they? We weigh the pros and cons of paying cash versus getting a mortgage. Then, we discuss the opportunities and risks of investing in D-class neighborhoods, as well as a few things all rookies should know before evicting tenants.

Ashley:
Every week we see the same thing happen in the forums. New investors are motivated, they’re consuming all the content, but they’re stuck because they’re afraid of making the wrong first move.

Tony:
So today we’re answering three real questions from beginners. We’re talking about how much money you actually need to start investing, whether you should invest locally or out of state, and how to get over the fear of pulling the trigger on your first deal.

Ashley:
This is The Real Estate Rookie Podcast. I’m Ashley Kehr.

Tony:
And I’m Tony J. Robinson. And with that, let’s get into today’s first question. So our first question comes from the BiggerPockets Forums, and it says, “I’ve spent the last few years doing light research on house hacking on flipping properties and the Burr strategy, but I’ve never mustered the courage to enter the market. After all of this time, I realized that I just can’t wait anymore. I’ve graduated from college and wants to try to do something with my first year out of it. I don’t want to live a life of mediocrity, any advice for potential ways to get started now.” Well, first, kudos to you for realizing that you can’t just keep waiting. I think that’s probably the first big step is realizing that at a certain point we have to move out of the information gathering stage and move into the action taking stage. Because if we don’t do that, then yeah, days turn to weeks, weeks turn to months, months turns to years and years turns into never doing it at all.
So I think that’s the first step is just realizing that it is important to finally take action. But I think the advice that I would start with, and we echo this thought a lot, but my first thing is understanding what your motivation is for investing in real estate. Sounds like you’re early in your career, you said you just graduated from college. So for you, it’s understanding what’s important to you right now as someone who’s a new working professional. Are you doing this because you want to reduce your living expenses? Okay, then house hacking maybe makes a ton of sense. Are you doing this because you want to quickly supplement the income you’re making from your day job? Then maybe something more active like flipping makes more sense. Do you want the long-term appreciation than maybe just some buy and hold properties where you’re plopping down 20% once every three to five years?
So I think first just understanding what your motivation is and why you want to invest in real estate is where I would start.

Ashley:
This would be my plan. I would house hack, first of all, but I would actually incorporate house hacking, flipping, and burring into this strategy. If you are just starting out and you’re maybe renting and you have the opportunity to house hack, this is what I would do. I would purchase a property and I would do a single family home with extra bedrooms and bathrooms and rent out by the room. And then I’m going to live in this property for two years, renting out the other rooms. At the end of two years, I’m going to move out and purchase another property, and then I’m going to continue to rent the house out for three more years. I’m going to fill my bedroom, rent it out. At the end of five years, or before the five-year mark, I’m going to sell the property. So this will satisfy the property has been your primary residence for two of the last five years, and you’ll be able to sell it for tax-free gain and not pay any taxes on the profit of this property.
And how I would incorporate kind of the Burr strategy into this is I would buy a property that needs to be rehabbed. And I would slowly do work on it over the course of the two years that I’m living there. Maybe you don’t have a roommate right away or someone else living in the bedrooms because you’re renovating part of the room, but I would do that strategy and by renovating it, you’re adding value to the property. Over those five years, those tenants are going to pay down your mortgage. You’re going to have, hopefully, you’re buying in an area that sees some appreciation over five years, and then I would go ahead and cash out. But at the same time, you’re already another three years into your next property. So I would just keep recycling this method property to property. So for five years, you’re getting rental income on these properties, two of the five years you’re getting a house to live in, and then you’re getting a big gain tax-free.
So that’s what I would do. If I was starting over and no kids, no family, just me, and I was renting and buying my first property, that is the plan that I would do for even 10 years, do it for all your 20s and buy your 30s, you could rack up quite a bit of money that way.

Tony:
I love that approach, Ash. You gave something super tactical. I think the only thing that I would change if I were to implement a plan similar to that is that I don’t think I’d sell all of them. I feel like I would try and maybe sell one, keep one, sell one, keep one. That way at the end of that decade, not only do you have these big chunks of cash you’ve been able to make, but at least you’ve got some that you’ve kept for the cash flow. And we’ve interviewed quite a few people who have used this strategy, but Matt Krueger was the most recent. And I think he did every year for like two years. Every two years for like a decade he did this and ended up with, what is it, seven properties or so that were cashflowing really well, all with these really low debts and really low out of pocket expenses.
So I think I would probably make that one small tweak so that way I’d still get some of the upside in the portfolio that I’m building. But couldn’t agree with you more that if I were in my early 20s with no kids, no wife, no responsibilities aside for myself, I would probably choose to make my life as uncomfortable as possible during that timeframe. So that way my 30s could be significantly more comfortable.

Ashley:
And I’m not talking about sleeping on the couch. I’m still having a bedroom and an en suite.

Tony:
And we laugh, but Craig Kurlop, who we interviewed, I can’t remember the episode number, but his first house hack, that’s exactly what he did. He slept on the couch and he rented out all of the other rooms in his house. So if you want to get that uncomfortable, you can. And Craig’s obviously going to be a really successful real estate investor, so it’s worked out for him. But to Ashley’s point, you can still have a little bit of comfort if you choose

Ashley:
To. Before we jump into the next question, let’s take a quick break. Getting started as hard enough and having the right tools in place early can save you from a lot of rookie mistakes, especially when it comes to staying organized from day one. We’ll be right back. Okay. Welcome back. We have our second question from the BiggerPockets Forums. This one says, “Hello, everyone. I live in LA and I have been saving aggressively to try and buy a house for myself. I’ve recently decided to start looking into investing in rentals out of state instead. I have $100,000 in cash and as of now, thinking of trying to buy a single family rental in cash if possible, looking for some advice, tips on which markets I should be researching, and if it’s a good idea to buy my first investment property in cash, or should I consider financing something that would be more turnkey?” Thanks in advance for all the help and words of encouragement.
Finding this community has really got me excited and motivated. Well, first of all, we love to hear that and welcome to the BiggerPockets community. So $100,000 in cash, a great chunk of money to be able to get started in real estate. So advice or tips on markets to research in. You definitely could buy a property in cash in Buffalo, New York, Syracuse, New York.
I won’t be the best property, but you could definitely get a decent property and then do some rehab and add some value to the property. But those are at least two markets I know of. But I think your first step should really be using the BiggerPockets Market Finder. And you basically go through the steps of looking through markets that kind of fit your criteria. It’s a really great tool that you can find biggerpockets.com right at the top there is the Market Finder.

Tony:
I think my first question though is why the feeling that buying in cash is necessary for that first deal? Is it because you just don’t want maybe the risk associated with getting debt on your first property? Or they mentioned at the end here, or would buying something turnkey make more sense? Maybe the person asking this question is assuming that they’re buying a really rough rehab and that’s why they want to buy in cash. So I think just answering that question first would be important because mathematically you’re going to get a better return on your investment if you include leverage in the purchase. Because if you’ve got $100,000, you could spend $100,000 to buy that property, or you could spend maybe $25,000 to get that same property. And obviously your cash flow will be a little bit less, but your return on that property would be significantly more.
So you could go get four properties at $25,000 down each or one property in cash at 100K. And in theory, those four properties at 25K down each would generate more than the one property paid off. So I think just asking yourself or trying to get an understanding of why are you focused on the cash perspective. I think for me, if I were paying cash for a property, it would only work for me if it was a value add opportunity, meaning I could buy something, invest the money to renovate it, and then refinance that property and hopefully recoup some of that cash that I put into that deal. And that’s what the Bur strategy is. So 100K in cash can get you into a lot of markets across the country. Like Ash said, it’s going to be maybe smaller markets, but it is an entry point in a lot of places.
So I think that’s where I would start is if you do want to go cash, look for a value add opportunity where then you can buy it, renovate it, refinance it, rent it, repeat it all over again.

Ashley:
And another option too, especially being out of state, it can be more difficult, not impossible and definitely doable to build your own team and have your maintenance guy and your property manager and all the vendors that you need and your boots on the ground, your agent, things like that. But another option, if you don’t have a team and you’re looking at a market is looking at a brand new build. We’re seeing so many builder incentives like buying down your interest rates, giving you seller credits, upgrading your home appliances, different things like that where that may be a great option when investing out of state, if you don’t have a team built. A lot of the properties I buy, they’re older properties and sometimes we’re not doing a full complete gut renovation on them and you’re going to have older plumbing, you’re going to have older exteriors, different things where you need to have a boots on the ground handyman that’s going to go in and make those repairs and stuff like that.
So maybe looking at a new build in an out- of-state market is also an option for you. Obviously it’s going to have to be if you do decide to get financing because I don’t know of any new builds unless you’re buying maybe a tiny home that’s 200 square feet, get a new build for 100,000.

Tony:
Yeah. The builder incentives, they’ve been pretty crazy I think these past couple of years as builders have fought with climbing interest rates and squeezed budgets of buyers to make sure they can keep moving inventory. So yeah, definitely a unique thing to try and take advantage of given where we’re at right now in the cycle of the market. All right. We’re going to take a quick break before our last question, but while we’re gone, be sure that you are subscribed to the Real Estate Rookie YouTube channel. You can find us @realestaterookie if you haven’t subscribed yet, and we’ll be back with more right after this. All right, welcome back. Our final question for the day also comes from the BiggerPockets Forums, and it says, “I’m a 28-year-old beginning investor and I’ve been more than ready intellectually, financially, et cetera, for almost a year now to buy my first property.
I’m going to be the one finding and managing the deal and my parents will help with half of the purchase or potentially even more.” The problem is, I’m looking at such a low price point in my area that when I actually get up and close to the house and meet the tenants, I get freaked out. How am I going to deal with these people, especially some of the Section eight people I meet? Even if I outsource the property management, who knows what repairs and are the surprises are in store for me in some of these places? Does anyone have experience with this? Would you say you have to approach some like investments as a semi-slumlord just because that’s the reality? So great question.
I think the first thing that I’ll say is there’s definitely truth in the idea that we talk about class neighborhoods when it comes to real estate investing that some of the lower class neighborhoods, your C class, your D class have tenant pools that are a little bit difficult, a little bit more difficult to manage. It doesn’t mean though that investing in the quote unquote D class neighborhoods is always going to be a bad investment. I think about our friend Steve Rosenberg, and he shared the story on stage a few times that I’ve heard him speak, but he had this portfolio of single family homes in a D class neighborhood, and Steve had a lot of experience in property management at that point, and it was the worst part of his portfolio. And he just said, “Hey, I’m going to bundle these all up and I’m going to try and see if I can sell them off to someone else.” And he sold them to a buyer who bought all of those problem properties that he had.
And then he ended up seeing that person a few years later at a conference. He’s like, “Man, hey, how’s that portfolio doing?” And the guy who bought them was like, “Man, these are my best performing properties.” So same exact homes, same exact neighborhood, same exact tenant pool, but two slightly different approaches in how they manage it. And for one person, it was their worst performing portfolio, for the other person it was the best part of their portfolio. So I think a lot of it does come down to you as an individual operator and how you manage those tenants. So that’s the first piece. The second thing that I’ll say is, is that if you’re worried about things like additional expenses around repairs or evictions or whatever those surprise costs might be, work those into your underwriting. So maybe you account for the fact that on day one, not only do you want to account for your down payment, your closing costs, whatever repairs you need to do, but you’re also accounting for on day one, maybe six months of reserves.
So if you have a fully funded six month reserve account on day one, that’ll give you some flexibility for whatever issues may or may not arise and allow you to sleep a little bit easier at night. So even if you had to evict someone on day one, you’ve got enough money set aside for that specific property to not have to lose sleep. So I think those are the first two big things that come to mind for me, Ash.

Ashley:
Yeah, those are all great points. And I think first of all, if you’re already freaked out that you’re just going to get more and more stressed if you actually go and purchase a deal like this. But I think one thing is to, if you do outsource to a property manager, ask their experience handling with different classes of tenants, like do they have properties that are already in a C class area or B class area? So getting their understanding of, and then asking how they deal with different things that could happen and how they handle if a lot of repairs come in or other surprises. So I guess I’m more curious as to what you are freaked out about. Is it just how they kept the apartment, that it wasn’t kept clean, that is what it kept nice. I’ve had quite a few Section eight tenants and all of them have taken very good care of the property because they don’t want to lose their housing voucher.
I think like in Buffalo, it’s like an eight-year waiting period to get a housing voucher. So if they don’t want to be kicked out because they don’t want to lose their housing voucher and they also have an inspection every single year where the inspection is more for you as the landlord to make sure the apartment is in compliance. So make sure when you’re touring these properties and they have Section eight tenants, make sure that they will pass the Section eight inspection because that could be the motivation for somebody selling is like, “You know what? There’s like too much that Section eight wants me to repair. I’m just going to sell the property and be done with it. ” So if you just contact the local housing authority that actually gives out the Section eight vouchers, they’ll be able to tell you what they look at in an inspection.
And none of it is crazy. These things should be done in the property anyways. Any outlet is grounded by, has a GFI outlet by any water source and things like that. But the thing that I will say here is that if you are going to approach this property and you said approach some like investments as a semi-slumlord, I would say no. I would say that this is not the right mindset to have going into the property. I think that you can do things to change the value of that property. So for example, we have a tenant that constantly doesn’t pay, or she pays, but she’s late. The place is just packed with stuff. She doesn’t take great care of the property, things like that. But we’ve done a couple things and it really has changed how she is treated and taking care of the property.
So we actually got her a dumpster. We paid for it, got her dumpster and she actually filled up the dumpster. Whenever the landscaper would come, he would help her clean up the yard so he could actually mow the grass. And she actually started to feel bad and she’d run out there when she saw him full of hit and come and clean up the yard and stuff. So I think if you have the semi-slumlord mentality, it’s just going to keep your tenants in that mindset that you don’t care why should they care. So I think kind of shifting that mindset can actually go a long way. And I think this is something that’s a huge debate. So let me know in the comments, do you think like you should do these extra things for tenants that are living in the property to try and help them out, even though you are running a business and your bottom line is your bottom line and you want to be profitable and you want to make as much cashflow as you can.
So let me know in the comments below how you see it and what would you do in situations like this?

Tony:
Well, Ash, kudos to you. I think it is somewhat counterintuitive for a lot of investors to reinvest into a property that they feel isn’t being treated well by the tenant, but I think it goes to show that people are still people and if you can kind of touch them in their hearts or kind of speak to what motivates them, that maybe you can have their behavior change in a way that’s beneficial for both of you. But I couldn’t agree more that no one should go into real estate investing with the intention of being even a semi-slumlord. The goal for us should be to provide safe, clean, relatively affordable housing for the people that live in our properties. And if you go into it with a different mindset, then I think you do have to question whether or not real estate investing is the right path for you.
But at the end of the day, we’re providing people with housing, which is, for many people, their biggest expense in life. So we want to make sure that we’re doing it in the best way possible.

Ashley:
Yeah. And I think some of these little expenses you do to help the tenant actually help you out in the long run that your property is being taken care of and you don’t have this huge turnover expense when you need to renovate it to get somebody else into it. And I will say, as nice as I sound, I did try to evict her, but she paid rent literally at the courthouse and they dismissed the eviction. So I still am very business minded, but I was like, “Okay, I need to find a different way to solve this problem and a different solution.” And in New York State, it’s very hard to evict someone unless it’s for nonpayment. And she ended up getting caught up and it’s just the attorney fees start racking up when you keep sending notices and start the eviction process and then they end up paying before … I think we’ve tried to do it three times with her and she always does pay.
It’s just, it’s late and late and late, but I think we found a better workaround as to what can we do to kind of make it the situation more bearable for both of us. And it definitely has been working.

Tony:
Ash, let me ask one last follow-up question on that. Is there anything in New York law that states if someone has been served an eviction like X number of times, that at some point you can maybe skip the line and just go to the eviction or can it be this kind of game of cat and mouse forever?

Ashley:
If anybody knows of that loophole, please tell me because I do not know of it or how to do it because all I know is you got to start the process all over again. I mean, you can’t even deny someone in New York State because they have a previous eviction anymore.

Tony:
But could you non-renew their lease for that reason?

Ashley:
Yep, you could. You could do a non-lease renewal, but then if they don’t move out, then you’re going through the whole eviction process to get them out for non-renewal, which you can do. It’s just you’re starting the process over again. And I’ve tried to do it a couple times and the judge always wants the attorneys to work through it like, “What can we do to make this situation?” Literally, it seems like the last thing they want to do is kick somebody out, which I understand that. But my God, every time my attorney comes back and says, “Okay, so we worked out a payment agreement and we’re going to do this payment plan.” And he’s like, “They just won’t evict.” And it’s mostly right in the city of Buffalo where this happens, where the smaller towns are way easier and more lenient. But in the city of Buffalo, they constantly want to see something worked out.
And at first, it was never like that 10 years ago when I first started investing, but now it’s like you’re going to court multiple times for this. So

Tony:
Then it’s just like, is it even worth a headache? It’s a headache either way.

Ashley:
Literally at one point, my attorney called me, I think it was his fourth time in court with this one person we were evicting and he’s just like, “I’m done. Sell your properties in Buffalo. Why would anyone invest here?” And I was like, “Okay, I’m mad about this, but you are definitely way more mad at me. ” It was funny. I mean, not funny because it was an awful process, but- Yeah.

Tony:
But we can look back and laugh on it now.

Ashley:
Yeah. Yeah. Well, thank you guys so much for listening today. I’m Ashley. He’s Tony and we’ll see you guys on the next real estate rookie episode.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].



Source link


Home improvement activity has remained elevated in the post-pandemic period, but both the volume of loan applications and the age profile of borrowers have shifted in notable ways. Data from the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), analyzed by NAHB, show that total home improvement loan applications have eased from their recent post-pandemic peak, and the distribution of borrowers across age groups has gradually tilted older.

The number of home improvement loan applications increased sharply during the housing boom and the remodeling surge that followed the onset of the pandemic. After totaling 1.15 million loans in 2019, activity fell 20% to 0.92 million in 2020 as uncertainty and lockdowns disrupted markets. Applications then rebounded to 1.07 million in 2021 and climbed to a cycle high of 1.49 million in 2022, reflecting strong demand for renovations. Since then, activity has moderated but remains historically solid, edging down to 1.25 million loans in 2023 and 1.20 million in 2024. Despite cooling from the pandemic-era surge, the 2024 total stands above pre-pandemic levels, supported by an aging housing stock and limited inventory of existing homes for sale.

Alongside these changes in loan volume, the age composition of borrowers has gradually shifted, revealing notable changes across age groups.

In 2019, applicants ages 45-54 accounted for the largest share of home improvement loans at 26.0%. By 2024, their share slipped slightly to 25.2% but remained the largest cohort. The 55-64 age group experienced a more noticeable decline, falling from 23.2% in 2019 to 21.7% in 2024.

In contrast, both younger and older segments expanded their presence in the remodeling market. Borrowers ages 35-44 increased their share from 22.0% to 22.9%, while those ages 25-34 rose from 8.7% to 9.1%. Although, still representing a small portion of total applications, applicants under age 25 edged up from 0.4% to 0.5%. More notably, the share of older loan applicants increased. The 65-74 cohort ticked up from 13.1% to 13.2%, and applicants over age 74 rose from 4.7% to 5.4%.

Overall, the data indicate a gradual aging of home improvement activity. Borrowers aged 65 and older accounted for 17.8% of loan applications in 2019, increasing to 18.6% in 2024. This shift likely reflects both the aging of the homeowner population and a growing preference among older homeowners to undertake aging-in-place renovation and maintain homes they have owned for many years. Meanwhile, the modest gains among borrowers in their mid-30s to early 40s suggest continued renovation demand from trade-up buyers and households choosing to remodel rather than buy a new home amid high interest rates.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


This article is presented by Dominion Financial.

Here’s something most real estate investors figure out the hard way: The best deals don’t go to the highest bidder. They go to the fastest closer.

You’ve probably seen it happen. A solid rental property hits the market. You run the numbers, they work, and you put in a strong offer. And then a cash buyer swoops in, not necessarily higher, just faster, and the seller takes it without blinking.

It’s frustrating. And it feels unfair. But once you understand why sellers behave this way, you can start using that knowledge to your advantage, even if you’re financing every deal.

Because here’s the thing most investors don’t know: Financing has finally caught up to cash. There are lenders (like Dominion Financial) who can close a DSCR rental loan in 10 days. Not 30. Not 45. Ten.

So the question isn’t whether you can compete with cash buyers anymore. It’s whether you know how.

Why Cash Wins (and It’s Not What You Think)

Most investors assume sellers prefer cash because of the money itself. No appraisal contingency or bank to deal with—just a clean, straightforward transaction. But that’s only part of it.

What sellers are really buying when they accept a cash offer is certainty. They’re buying the confidence that the deal will actually close, on time, without drama. 

According to the National Association of Realtors, a significant portion of sellers rank the reliability of closing as a top priority, often above the final sale price. Think about that for a second: Sellers will take less money for more certainty. That’s the dynamic you’re up against every time you submit a financed offer with a 30- or 45-day closing timeline.

And the longer your financing takes, the more uncertainty you’re injecting into the deal. Every extra week is another week the seller is wondering if you’ll come back with a price reduction after the inspection, your lender will ask for more documentation, or if the deal will fall apart entirely.

Extended timelines aren’t just inconvenient. They are a negotiating disadvantage built into the financing itself.

So when investors ask why they keep losing to cash buyers, the honest answer usually isn’t price. It’s time.

The DSCR Advantage Most Investors Are Leaving on the Table

DSCR loans were supposed to solve this problem.

If you’re not familiar, DSCR stands for Debt Service Coverage Ratio. It’s a loan structure designed specifically for rental properties that qualifies you based on the property’s income, not your personal tax returns or W-2s. 

The property pays for itself, so the underwriting process should be simpler, faster, and less invasive than a conventional loan. And in theory, it is.

But in practice? Most lenders are still running DSCR loans through the same slow, manual processes they use for everything else. You still end up waiting 30 days or more and find yourself chasing down documents, waiting on appraisals, and hoping your loan officer actually returns your calls.

The structure of the loan is fast. The lender’s process is not.

This is the gap that’s costing investors deals every single day. DSCR was built to give rental investors an edge: flexible qualification, property-focused underwriting, and the ability to scale without getting strangled by your debt-to-income ratio. But if the execution is slow, you’re still showing up to a knife fight with a loan estimate and a prayer.

The investors who understand this are doing something different. They’re not just shopping for the best DSCR rate. They’re shopping for the best DSCR process.

What Competing With Cash Actually Looks Like in Practice

Imagine two buyers walking into the same deal: A rental duplex, priced fairly, with solid cash flow in a market with strong fundamentals. The seller wants to close quickly and move on.

  • Buyer A is a cash buyer. They can close in 14 days.
  • Buyer B is financing, but their lender can close in 10 days.

Who wins? Buyer B. And the seller probably never even asks about financing because the timeline speaks for itself.

That’s the conversation that’s starting to happen in markets where investors have figured out how to weaponize their closing speed. When you can close faster than a cash buyer, you stop being “the financing offer” and start being the sure thing.

And the advantages compound from there. Faster closings mean faster rent collection. Your capital isn’t sitting in escrow for six weeks while the property generates nothing. You close, you tenant, you move. And then you start looking for the next deal, while slower investors are still waiting to get their keys.

For anyone trying to scale a rental portfolio, this matters enormously. The bottleneck isn’t usually deal flow. It’s execution speed. Every week you’re waiting to close is a week you’re not deploying capital, earning rent, or building toward your next acquisition.

Speed isn’t just a competitive advantage at the offer stage. It’s a portfolio growth strategy.

What to Look for in a Lender If Speed Is Your Strategy

Not all fast lenders are created equal, and this part matters.

Some lenders will promise you a quick close and then deliver the same slow process with a more optimistic timeline attached to it. Speed without process discipline is just a sales pitch.

When you’re evaluating lenders on execution speed, here’s what to actually look for.

1. Process-driven timelines, not just promises

Ask the lender specifically what happens between application and closing. Where do deals typically get stuck? What have they built to prevent that? Vague answers are a red flag.

2. Pricing transparency

A faster close should not mean a worse rate. If a lender is charging a premium for speed, that’s worth knowing upfront so you can run the actual math. The best fast lenders don’t treat speed as a luxury feature. It’s just how they operate.

3. Track record with rental investors

A lender who primarily works with owner-occupants is going to approach a DSCR rental loan with an owner-occupant mindset. You want someone who does this every day and has built their systems around it.

4. Straightforward documentation requirements

One of the biggest sources of delay in any loan is back-and-forth on documentation. Lenders who know exactly what they need and ask for it once, cleanly, close faster than those who drip requests over weeks.

Get clear answers on all four of those before you commit. Because the lender you choose is either an asset or a liability in every deal you make.

How Dominion Financial Is Closing DSCR Loans in 10 Days

So what does this actually look like in practice?

Dominion Financial built its Express DSCR Rental Loan around a simple premise: Investors shouldn’t have to choose between financing speed and pricing discipline. You should be able to get both.

Their Express program closes in 10 days, not as a rush service or with a premium tacked on. That’s just the timeline they’ve engineered their process to deliver.

Dominion Financial streamlined its documentation review, underwriting, and closing coordination into a single, friction-reduced workflow. They’re not a legacy lender with a stack of manual processes bolted together. They designed this program specifically for rental investors who need to move at market speed.

And they back it up with a DSCR price-beat guarantee. If you find a better rate on a comparable DSCR loan, they’ll beat it. So you’re not trading a good rate for speed. You’re getting both.

For investors who’ve been frustrated watching cash buyers walk away with deals that should have been theirs, this changes the math completely. You don’t need an all-cash portfolio to compete like one. You need a lender whose process works as fast as the market does.

The practical impact is real. You can submit stronger offers with shorter closing windows. You can tell sellers with confidence that you’ll be done in 10 days. And in a market where that’s faster than most cash buyers, your financed offer stops being a liability and starts being a weapon.

Who this is built for: Active rental investors, buy-and-hold operators, and portfolio builders who are tired of losing deals to slow financing and want a DSCR process that matches how they actually invest. 

If that’s you, it’s worth a look. Click here to learn more about the Express DSCR Rental Loan from Dominion Financial and find out how fast you can actually close your next deal.



Source link


This article is presented by Proper Insurance.

As a real estate investor, you likely already know quite a bit about the importance of landlord insurance for your rental properties. You also probably know that landlord policies are separate and different from regular home insurance.

But what about when you decide to branch out into short-term rentals? You might be comparing policies and wondering if Airbnb rentals will be covered if you decide to go down that route in the future, or only occasionally, or you may be considering a complete business strategy switch to short-term rentals.

Regardless of the exact circumstance, there’s one point that will apply to you in most cases: You will need to dig deeper into your current policy specs rather than assuming your short-term rental will be adequately covered by your current policy. Many investors only discover coverage gaps after a denied claim, which is why providers that specialize specifically in short-term rental insurance, like Proper Insurance, emphasize reviewing your policy before you ever host your first guest.

If you haven’t bought your policy yet but are thinking about going into short-term rentals, here are the things you need to think twice about when buying insurance.

Can My Landlord Policy Cover Short-Term Rentals?

The short answer is: it depends — and that uncertainty alone is worth investigating. Landlord/Dwelling insurance is not designed to cover the vast risks of short-term rentals, but that’s not always obvious. Some insurers market DP-3 policies as short-term rental products, but underneath, they remain standard landlord policies with the same limitations.

The most significant of those limitations is liability and guest-caused damage.

If you’re renting your investment property as a short-term rental, a Commercial Homeowners policy is the appropriate product. Unlike Landlord insurance, a Commercial policy is a business policy built to cover business operations, with Commercial General Liability that extends beyond your property line, and without the exclusions that can leave property owners and investors exposed.

Equally, if you’re completely switching over your rentals to STRs, you can’t just keep your current landlord policy and hope for the best. There is a mechanism for writing the occasional short-term stay into the homeowner’s insurance for your primary residence. In this case, the insurer can simply add on what’s known as a “rider” to your existing policy. But an investment property that has been rented out on a long-term basis (12+ months is the standard lease term for LTR) will not be covered. 

What a Landlord Policy Will Not Cover When It Comes to Short-Term Rentals

Let’s take a more in-depth look at what won’t be covered and why relying on a landlord policy for a short-term rental can lead to unexpected costs when something goes wrong.

For an insurer, deciding how to structure an insurance policy and how much coverage to offer boils down to the specific risks associated with the activity that’s being insured. And while to a beginner investor, STRs and LTRs seem like similar activities, they are actually subject to very different risks—hence the different coverage types required.

The most significant coverage gap is in liability. Landlord insurance protects investors by covering lawsuits for tenants’ personal injuries while occupying the property. But what if it turns out that the “tenants” suing for personal injury were only staying for the weekend and are not the tenants named on the long-term lease? The insurer most likely will deny coverage. Most Landlord policies include a “business pursuits” exclusion. Your insurer has the authority to determine that short-term renting is a business pursuit; your liability coverage could be voided entirely, even for incidents that do occur on the premises.

The same goes for if a guest slipped and fell in front of an outdoor hot tub or got injured while kayaking in a nearby river in a kayak you provided as a host. Certain activities, amenities, or off-premises exposures may require separate coverage or specific endorsements and are often excluded unless explicitly insured. Without appropriate coverage, even a single accident involving a hot tub, pool, or recreational equipment can quickly escalate into a six-figure liability exposure.

Next, if a guest steals something of yours during a weekend stay, landlord coverage will not be of help here because landlord policies assume that nothing in a rental property is your own personal property, with most LTR properties offered on an unfurnished/partially furnished basis. Theft is especially problematic if you offer an STR that is elaborately furnished or “themed” with knick-knacks and unique decor. 

Be careful with this, though: Even short-term insurance plans often won’t cover the cost of expensive items like artwork or jewelry; if you really feel like leaving these in a property you’ll be using as an STR, you’ll need to add a special add-on plan for valuable personal property.

Hot water heater, air conditioner, refrigerator, circuit panels, heating, or smart home system stops working? If an appliance breaks due to mechanical failure, landlord insurance generally does not cover replacement unless a specific equipment breakdown endorsement is in place. Landlord insurance typically responds only to damage caused by a covered peril such as fire or storm. And if you are forced to cancel a booking due to the equipment that broke down, without this coverage, you’ll have to shoulder the loss of income from that booking and any other impacted booking as well. 

What if one of your guests accidentally brings in bedbugs via their bags? A pest infestation can make an STR uninhabitable for weeks while pest control deals with the issue. 

Landlord insurance does not cover pest infestations because they’re considered preventable with proper maintenance. Some short-term rental policies, on the other hand, will cover this problem due to high guest turnover, which can make such infestations impossible to prevent in short-term properties. 

When bedbugs or similar infestations occur under a landlord policy, the financial impact is twofold: the owner is responsible for extermination and remediation costs and must cancel upcoming reservations while the property is out of service. Because landlord policies do not include loss-of-revenue protection, the lost booking revenue during this downtime is typically uninsured.               

All these exclusions amount to a fundamental assumption about the key differences between STRs and LTRs: Long-term renters, as a rule, tend to take better care of the properties they occupy than short-term renters. They are also less likely to sue their landlords because they want to stay in their home, so you have less of a risk of someone filing a claim opportunistically. Long-term rentals are just subject to fewer unpredictabilities. 

For all these reasons, short-term rentals require their own kind of insurance with higher liability limits, broader property protection, and business income considerations, coverage structures that contemplate hospitality-style operations rather than long-term tenancy.

When a Rental Becomes a Business

There’s one more important thing investors need to know about switching to short-term rental insurance: What you’ll be switching to is actually a form of commercial insurance, combined with elements of home insurance. 

In the eyes of an insurer, a short-term rental stay is considered a “business activity.” In this, the insurers follow IRS guidance that deems active hospitality, where cleaning, concierge services, and amenities are offered as part of the stay, a business activity rather than passive income, as in the case of traditional real estate investing. 

This is important not just because this designation as a business activity may automatically exclude you from LTR landlord policies, most of which come with a “business pursuit exclusion” clause, but also because you may need a lot more than you think as an STR landlord, including a business permit, a local STR registration, and any other licensing required specifically of short-term rentals in your local area. 

The precise guidelines vary, and you’ll need to do your own research, but, as a rule of thumb, if you’re planning on using your investment property for stays that will be, on average, seven days or fewer, you almost certainly will fall into the category of a short-term rental “business,” with all the legal implications. 

Final Thoughts

For a short-term rental landlord, there’s far more to think about due to the higher-risk and more unpredictable nature of this rental strategy.

If you’re planning on renting through Airbnb or Vrbo, it can be tempting to rely solely on the OTA guarantees these companies advertise.

Resist the temptation to skip the fine print. Standard platform protections come with significant limitations. For example, Airbnb’s host coverage is not a policy with your name on it, meaning you forfeit all policy rights. They are in complete control of the process, how long it takes, if you get paid, and how much for any experienced loss. 

The strongest protection strategy is a policy designed specifically for short-term rentals and customized to your property’s risk profile. Working with a provider that specializes exclusively in STR coverage, such as Proper Insurance, ensures your policy reflects the realities of operating a hospitality business, not just owning a rental property.



Source link


NAHB recently released its 2026 Priced-Out Analysis, highlighting the housing affordability challenge. While previous posts discussed the impacts of rising home prices and interest rates on affordability, this post focuses on the related U.S. housing affordability pyramid. The pyramid reveals that 52% of households (70 million) cannot afford a $300,000 home, while the estimated median price of a new home is around $410,000 in 2026.

The housing affordability pyramid illustrates the number of households able to purchase a home at various price steps. Each step represents the number of households that can only afford homes within that specific price range. The largest share of households falls within the first step, where homes are priced under $200,000. As home prices increase, fewer and fewer households can afford the next price level, with the highest-priced homes, those over $2.5 million, having the smallest number of potential buyers. Housing affordability remains a critical challenge for households with income at the lower end of the spectrum.

The pyramid is based on income thresholds and underwriting standards. Under these assumptions, the minimum income required to purchase a $200,000 home at the mortgage rate of 6% is $55,500. In 2026, about 47.5 million households in the U.S. are estimated to have incomes no more than that threshold and, therefore, can only afford to buy homes priced up to $200,000. These 47.5 million households form the bottom step of the pyramid. Of the remaining households that can afford a home priced at $200,000, 22.4 million can only afford to pay a top price of somewhere between $200,000 and $300,000. These households make up the second step on the pyramid. Each subsequent step narrows further, reflecting the shrinking number of households that can afford increasingly expensive homes.

It is worthwhile to compare the number of households that can afford homes at various price levels and the number of owner-occupied homes available in those ranges, as shown in Figure 2. For example, while around 47.5 million households can afford a home priced at $200,000 or less, there are only 20.7 million owner-occupied homes valued in this price range. This trend continues in the $200,000 $300,000 price range, where the number of households that can afford homes is much higher than the number of housing units in that range. These imbalances reflect the ongoing challenges of housing affordability.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .

Pin It