Tag

Remain

Browsing


While new homes remain largely unaffordable, builder efforts to improve housing affordability paid dividends in the second quarter of 2025, according to the latest data from the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)/Wells Fargo Cost of Housing Index (CHI). The CHI results from the second quarter of 2025 show that a family earning the nation’s median income of $104,200 needed 36% of its income to cover the mortgage payment on a median-priced new home. Low-income families, defined as those earning only 50% of median income, would have to spend 71% of their earnings to pay for the same new home.

The figures are somewhat higher for the purchase of existing homes in the U.S., showing that it took more income to buy an existing home. A typical family would have to pay 37% of their income for a median-priced existing home while a low-income family would need to pay 74% of their earnings to make the same mortgage payment.

The second quarter of 2025 marked the largest historical gap where existing home prices exceeded those of new homes. Different dynamics in the two sectors are responsible for the price divergence. On one hand, builders are offering incentives for smaller homes on smaller lots, with streamlined options and features, and thus shifting their production toward less expensive homes.  Many existing homeowners, meanwhile, are locked-in their homes by low mortgage rates, limiting resale inventory, and causing existing home prices to increase.

The percentage of a family’s income needed to purchase a new home was unchanged at 36% from the first to the second quarter, while the low-income CHI fell from 72% to 71% over the same period. Median new home prices edged down 1%, from $416,900 in Q1 2025 to $410,800 in Q2 2025, while the average 30-year mortgage rate slipped from 6.91% to 6.88%.

Affordability of existing homes, on the other hand, edged lower for both median- and low-income families between the first and second quarters. Median existing home prices rose 7% during this period, from $402,300 to $429,400. The share of income needed to pay for an existing home rose from 35% to 37% for a typical family and from 70% to 74% for a low-income family during this period.

CHI is also available for 175 metropolitan areas, calculating the percentage of a family’s income needed to make the mortgage payment on an existing home based on the local median home price and median income in those markets.

In 10 out of 175 markets in the second quarter, the typical family is severely cost-burdened (must pay more than 50% of their income on a median-priced existing home). In 85 other markets, such families are cost-burdened (need to pay between 31% and 50%). There are 80 markets where the CHI is 30% of earnings or lower.

The Top 5 Severely Cost-Burdened Markets

San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif., was the most severely cost-burdened market on the CHI, where 93% of a typical family’s income is needed to make a mortgage payment on an existing home. This was followed by:

Urban Honolulu, Hawaii (73%)

San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, Calif. (72%)

San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, Calif. (67%)

Naples-Marco Island, Fla. (60%)

Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Palm Springs, Fla. (60%)

Low-income families would have to pay between 119% and 186% of their income in all six of the above markets to cover a mortgage.

The Top 5 Least Cost-Burdened Markets

By contrast, Decatur, Ill., was the least cost-burdened markets on the CHI, where typical families needed to spend just 17% of their income to pay for a mortgage on an existing home. Rounding out the least burdened markets are:

Elmira, N.Y. (18%)

Peoria, Ill. (19%)

Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, Iowa-Ill. (19%)

Binghamton, N.Y. (19%)

Low-income families in these markets would have to pay between 33% and 38% of their income to cover the mortgage payment for a median-priced existing home.

Visit nahb.org/chi for tables and details.

Discover more from Eye On Housing

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


Only 56% of professional remodelers undertake projects designed to allow homeowners to Age-in-Place (AIP), according to results from NAHB’s Q1 2025 Remodeling Market Index (RMI) survey.  This is the lowest percentage recorded since NAHB began periodically asking AIP questions on its RMI survey in 2004.  Economic uncertainty and high interest rates over the past year are the most likely explanations for this slight pullback in projects.  Additionally, stock market volatility has dampened any potential wealth effects, especially since over 75% of all corporate equities and mutual fund holdings are held by those 55 or older.

The National Institute of Aging defines AIP as “staying in your own home as you get older.”  This concept is becoming more relevant as the overall median age of the population continues to increase.  Given the age of the existing housing stock, the need to update homes for AIP is a major demand-driver for the remodeling sector.

Age Groups

When asked about the age groups of homeowners who request AIP work, 73% of remodelers indicated that homeowners are 65 years or older, followed by 55 to 64 years at 61%.  These two age groups have consistently been above 60% since the Q4 2010 survey.

Familiarity with Aging-in-Place

Ninety-six percent of remodelers indicated that most or some of their consumers are familiar with the AIP concept.  That share has been at least 90% since the Q4 2018 survey.

Type of Aging-in-Place Projects

Grab bars remain the most common AIP project, with 87% of remodelers reporting this job in the last year, followed by curb-less shower (78%), installing higher toilets (71%), and widening doorways (52%).  While their relative ranking has changed, these four have consistently been the AIP project types most often cited by remodelers.

Frequency of Aging-in-Place Requests

Seventy-three percent of remodelers indicated that requests for AIP features have significantly or somewhat increased over the past 5 years.  This figure has not changed much since the inception of the series in 2004, ranging from 72% to 77%.

Reasons for Aging-in-Place Work

As for the reason why customers are undertaking AIP projects, 91% of remodelers stated that customers are planning ahead for future needs, followed by living with older parents (48%) and acute age-related disabilities (43%). 

Who is Requesting Aging-in-Place Work?

Sixty-five percent of remodelers indicated that a majority of their AIP work was determined by the client, whereas the other 35% said it was mostly suggested by the contractor.  The ‘determined by client’ option has consistently been above 50 percent.

Receptive to Aging-in-Place Modifications

When asked how receptive potential clients are to incorporating suggested AIP modifications, 48% indicated that their customers were very receptive and 51% were somewhat receptive, with only 2% stated that customers were not at all receptive to these modifications.  The combined share of potential clients being receptive (‘very receptive’ + ‘somewhat receptive’) has consistently been above 95%.

Discover more from Eye On Housing

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .

Pin It