Tag

industry

Browsing



The quarterly U.S. Houzz Pro Industry Barometer surveys nearly 1,000 construction and architecture and design firms on Houzz about their expected, current and recent business activity. The Q2 2026 Barometer also examines how firms are responding to rising cost pressures, intensifying competition and ongoing labor shortages.

The latest report finds that business activity softened across both sectors in the first quarter of 2026. Even so, professionals enter Q2 with cautious optimism, as construction firms signal early signs of a rebound and design firms maintain a steady outlook despite sharper recent declines in project inquiries.

Against this backdrop, firms are increasingly focused on three key areas: managing rising costs and economic uncertainty, strengthening client relationships to stay competitive and evolving recruitment strategies to address persistent labor shortages. Here’s a closer look at how construction and design businesses are adapting.

1. Rising Costs and Uncertainty Weigh on Q2 Outlook

Cost pressures and broader economic uncertainty remain top concerns for construction and design professionals heading into the second quarter.
Nearly half of firms cite rising costs of products and materials as a key challenge (49% construction, 45% design).

Broader macroeconomic concerns also persist, particularly among design firms:Geopolitical uncertainty (23% construction, 30% design)Tariffs (17% construction, 30% design)Client hesitation continues to affect project timelines, with more than a quarter of firms reporting homeowners are delaying project starts (27% construction, 30% design).

In construction, labor constraints remain especially pronounced, with more than two-thirds of firms (67%) reporting skilled labor shortages.

Pros Expect Q2 Rebound After Softer Start to 2026

2. Firms Focus on Client Experience to Stay Competitive

As competition intensifies, professionals are prioritizing client communication and experience to win and retain projects. Improving client communication is the most widely adopted strategy across both sectors, cited by 60% of construction firms and 45% of design firms.

Other approaches include:Adjusting pricing or offering promotions (42% construction, 19% design)Construction firms are more likely to rely on pricing strategies to secure work, while design firms continue to emphasize experience-driven differentiation and branding.

See how Houzz Pro can help you find customers, manage projects and grow your business

3. Recruitment Strategies Evolve Amid Labor Shortages

Ongoing labor constraints are pushing firms to rethink how they attract and retain talent. More than half of construction firms are investing in on-the-job training programs (57%), while design firms are more likely to pursue academic partnerships (26%).

Both sectors are expanding digital recruiting efforts:Social media recruiting (35% construction, 36% design)Highlighting use of advanced technology — AI, project management tools like Houzz Pro (10% construction, 16% design)These strategies reflect a broader effort to reach younger, tech-savvy talent while addressing long-term workforce gaps.

More for Pros on Houzz
Read more stories for pros
Browse millions of photos for inspiration
Learn about Houzz Pro software
Talk with your peers in the Houzz Pro Forum



This article was originally published by a www.houzz.com . Read the Original article here. .


Home builders are keenly aware of the complex long-term outlook ahead for the home building industry. A recent NAHB/Wells Fargo HMI survey asked builders to assess the impact of 14 major trends and forces on the health of the industry and housing demand over the next 10 years. Results show that home builders expect a mix of demographic, economic, and technological forces to exert significant, long-term influence on the industry. 

At one end, most builders consider five forces as strong or somewhat negative long-term risks to the industry and housing demand:

Government debt levels: 82%

Declining fertility rate: 78%

Long-term inflation outlook: 70%

Declining marriage rate: 67%

Energy costs: 61%

At the same time, builders identified several forces they expect to have a strong or somewhat positive impact on the health of the home building industry and housing demand over the next decade, led by structural and technological shifts:

Aging housing stock: 73%

Work-from-home trends: 65%

Artificial intelligence: 52%

Modular and panelized construction: 45%

These findings reveal that while long-term demographic trends and fiscal pressures are considered serious headwinds, builders also see meaningful opportunities to adapt related to an aging housing stock, evolving work patterns, and artificial intelligence. For additional details and results, please consult the full survey report.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


BUFFALO, N.Y. (WKBW) — Local realtors are bracing for some big changes in how you buy and sell your home.

On August 17, a recent settlement from the National Association of Realtors will go into effect, changing commission agreements across the country.

“It’s reshaping the industry,” said Vienna Laurendi, President of the Buffalo Niagara Association of Realtors.

For decades, people selling their homes have traditionally been responsible for a five to seven percent commission split between their agent and the buyer’s agent. But a Midwest jury ruled in part, that agreement can drive up home prices, and decided that commission should no longer automatically come from the seller.

Laurendi described to me how the ruling will change the real estate industry in three significant ways:

Any compensation offered by the home seller will no longer be published using a multiple listing service program.When a buyer wants to tour a home they now have to sign a contract with a buyers agent before they start touring the property.Communication between agents will increase “by 80 percent.”

The changes will give sellers more flexibility but could make things more costly for buyers.
For example, if the seller decides not to pay the commission to the buyer’s agent then the buyer would need to negotiate compensation with their agent.

So if you are looking to buy a $300,000 home, a traditional three percent commission could cost a buyer an additional $9,000.

“A buyer never really had to think about having that extra $9,000 available to cover their real estate agent. Now they will proactively talk about it with their realtor and come up with a game plan as to how they are going to pay the commission,” said Laurendi. “We are going to sit down. We are going to discuss the value that I offer. You are going to go over the contract and we are going to discuss what I would like to earn at the time of closing.”

Laurendi believes it will take some time for the real estate industry to adapt to the changes but believes realtors are dedicated to making it work.

“We are here for the consumer,” said Laurendi. “We are also here to pay our mortgages, but we truly are here for the consumer and we are going to help everyone get through this as quickly as possible. It’s going to be the new norm.”

If you have questions about the new changes you can call the Buffalo Niagara Association of Realtors at 716-636-9000 or email your questions to president@bnar.org





This article was originally published by a www.wkbw.com . Read the Original article here. .


The National Association of Realtors (NAR) requires the implementation of two policy changes no later than Saturday, August 17.

San Luis Obispo County real estate agent Christa Lowry explained the two changes taking place.

“The first change is that buyers will not be able to enter a home without a written and signed buyer’s representation agreement with their buyer’s agent,” Lowry said.

That agreement negotiates a percentage of the sale the buyer will pay their agent. Prior to this rule, buyers could opt out of paying the buyer a commission.

“They had the option to not, but it was standard that they did,” Lowry said.

She added that while this new change requires the buyer to pay the buyer’s agent a commission, that commission fee is agreed upon by both parties.

“It’s a negotiable amount. That’s the most important thing to know,” Lowry said.

The second change prevents a listing agent from disclosing an agent’s commission or concession on the Multiple Listing Service. Instead, buyers will need to contact the listing agent directly about commission or concession fees.

“Buyers used to be able to call an agent and say, ‘Hey, I’d like to see five properties.’ There [was] no written agreement. There [was] no talk about commission or concession,” Lowry said. “Now they have to sit down and have that conversation with a buyer’s agent.”

Jenny Heinzen works as a broker for Vineyard Professional Real Estate, a luxury real estate firm in Paso Robles.

She said most of these changes involve a restructuring of business.

“It’s just kind of a work-around with the paperwork,” Heinzen said.

However, she said first-time home buyers could be impacted by the changes.

“A lot of times first-time home buyers are stretching for payment and if those first-time home buyers are asked to pay their buyer’s agent commission, that affects their down payment capabilities,” she said.

Heinzen noted that those costs can be avoided by structuring agreements differently.

“Our goal on our listings and most of the agents within the county is to get compensated by the seller,” Heinzen said.

She said for those new to buying a home or looking for help navigating these changes, finding the right agent is key.

“It’s going to be really important to work with good, experienced agents who are selling the types of property that you want to buy or sell,” Heinzen said. “Find a good agent and a good agent will educate you.”





This article was originally published by a www.ksby.com . Read the Original article here. .


Aug. 17 will mark major changes for the real estate industry and the rollout of new rules about how Realtors are paid for buying and selling homes.

The changes are coming about because the powerful real estate trade group, the National Association of Realtors, agreed in March to settle lawsuits in which sellers accused the group of running up fees. At the time, the group agreed to pay $418 million in damages, but it also agreed to change the way commission rules work — a change that will go into effect within the week.

In the past, when someone went to buy a home, he or she would typically go out and get representation from a Realtor, and that Realtor’s compensation for his or her services was paid by the seller, according to Stephen O’Connor, chairman of the Center for Real Estate and Urban Analysis at George Washington University.

“So typically, a commission on a home, if you had a home for one million dollars and you were selling it, the commission structure would typically be 5% or 6%, out of that 5% or 6%, typically half would go to the listing broker, the person who was actually selling the house for the seller, and the other half would go to the buyer’s agent,” he explained to the Washington Examiner.

The NAR was sued because some people thought that was an unfair payment structure. Still, the NAR has argued that their compensation structures were always negotiable and transparent, O’Connor added.

With the new changes, now when someone wants to buy a house, he or she has to sign an agreement with an agent.

“So no longer is the seller responsible for paying the commission structure or the fees associated with the buyer’s representation,” O’Connor said. “So right now, as of Aug. 17, if I want to go out and I want to buy a house, I’m going to have to negotiate with a real estate agent and sign an agreement for buyer’s representation and negotiate what I’m going to pay out of my own pocket … the fee that that person is going to charge me for their professional services.”

The NAR itself has been optimistic about the new changes. Vince Malta, a member of NAR’s leadership team who previously served as the group’s president, told the Washington Examiner that the written agreement will improve transparency.

“We believe this will help with transparency, a better understanding of the relationship, what are the expectations of the parties, and it has to specify what compensation is expected or will be paid,” Malta said.

Malta said the agreement also makes it so offers of compensation will no longer be allowed on multiple listing services — central databases used by Realtors to share details about homes for sale.

“Those offers of compensation would have to occur off of the MLS, so various ways — another document like in a disclosure package or a phone call, but not on the multiple listing service,” he said.

But it doesn’t preclude an offer of compensation.

“If a seller and listing agent believe that it is in the best interest to sell that home to offer compensation to an agent that is representing a buyer, then offers of compensation could still be made,” Malta said.

The $418 million settlement and rules change came after a federal jury last October found major real estate groups liable and ordered them to pay $1.8 billion in damages as part of the antitrust lawsuit that accused them of colluding to inflate the rates of commissions.

The jury, based in Kansas City, Missouri, found that not only NAR but also Keller Williams Realty and HomeServices of America conspired to inflate and maintain high commissions artificially.

O’Conner said he doesn’t think this will greatly affect home sales volume. The housing market has been closely watched the past few years given soaring mortgage rates and home prices.

As of Wednesday, the average rate on a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage was at 6.52%, according to Mortgage News Daily, which tracks daily changes in rates. That is down from a peak last year of above 8%, although it is still higher than in the years prior to the pandemic.

“I don’t think it’s going to affect home sales at all,” O’Connor said. “I think people are going to sell their home when they’re ready to sell their home. People are going to buy a home when they’re ready to buy a home. This is just different in terms of who gets to represent who and, more specifically, who’s paying who.”

On the agent side, O’Connor said it is yet to be seen how it will shake out, for instance, whether the change will affect the total membership size of the NAR. But he said it will be harder for agents to make money because of the change.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Others think this will be a big change that may be challenging for realtors.

“This is a grand social experiment in an industry at scale,” Leo Pareja, CEO of eXp Realty, told CNN. “I’m bracing my agents for what I call the ‘messy middle.’ I fully expect a lot of confusion.”



This article was originally published by a www.washingtonexaminer.com . Read the Original article here. .

Pin It