Tag

Homes

Browsing


In 2023, the most common number of bedrooms in newly-built single-family homes continued to be three at a 45.7% share.  This share is up almost three percentage points from 42.8% in 2022. The second highest share was single-family homes with four bedrooms at 33.1%, followed by homes with two bedrooms or less at 11.5% and then homes with five or more bedrooms at 9.7%.

As shown above, the share of single-family homes started with three bedrooms rose to its highest level since 2019. While this share rose, the second most frequently built number of bedrooms (four) fell to 33.1%, the lowest share for such homes since 2012. At the same time, the share of new single-family homes with 2 bedrooms or less reached its highest level since 2012. The share of homes with five bedrooms or more has remained fairly stagnant at around 10% over the past ten years.

Regions

Across U.S. Census divisions, the share of new single-family homes with four or more bedrooms features distinct variations. The share ranged from a low of 22.0% in the New England division to the highest share of 47.9% in the West South Central division. Coinciding with the fall in the share of new single-family homes with 4 bedrooms or more nationally, there are no divisions that have a share above 50%. In 2022, the data featured the South Atlantic (51.7%), Pacific (51.4%) and West South Central (50.6%) all with above 50% shares.

Purpose of Construction

The number of bedrooms in the home greatly varied in 2023 depending on a new single-family home’s purpose of construction (built-for-sale, contractor-built, owner-built, built-for-rent). Most of this variation comes from the two-bedroom or less homes and four-bedrooms homes. For example, the share of new single-family homes with two bedrooms or less ranges from 5.7% of homes built-for-sale to 38.4% of homes built-for-rent. Meanwhile, three-bedroom homes and five or more bedroom homes display relatively little change across purpose of construction, as shown in the chart below.   

Discover more from Eye On Housing

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


Shares of new single-family homes built with private wells and individual septic systems decreased in 2023, compared with the previous year. NAHB tabulation of data from the Survey of Construction (SOC) indicates approximately 9% of new single-family homes started in 2023 were served by individual wells and 17% had private septic systems. There are large variations for these shares across the nine Census divisions with the corresponding shares reaching 26% and 38% in New England – the highest occurrence rates in the nation.

Nationally, 9% of new single-family homes started in 2023 were served by individual wells, with the majority relying on public water systems, which include community or shared supplies. In New England, where the median lot size is almost 3 times larger than the national average, 26% of new homes used private wells. Private wells were also common in the East North Central division, where nearly 22% of new homes had them. The Middle Atlantic division had the third-highest share at 14%. These divisions, along with the South Atlantic division (13%), surpassed the national average of 9%. Conversely, individual wells were rare in the East South Central and West South Central divisions, accounting for only a 1% share.

For sewage disposal, 82% of new homes were connected to public sewers (including community or shared sewage/septic systems) in 2023, and 17% utilized individual septic systems. The share of individual septic system decreased from 18% in 2022 to 17% in 2023.

The use of individual septic systems varied by division. In New England, 38% of new homes had private septic systems, while the East South Central, South Atlantic, and East North Central divisions reported 30%, 25%, and 23% shares, respectively. These shares, including the Middle Atlantic (18%), were above the national average of 17%. Shares were below average in the Mountain (10%), West North Central (10%), Pacific (8%), and West South Central (6%) divisions.

Compared to the previous year, the proportion of new single-family homes with individual septic systems fell in five out of nine divisions. Notably, New England saw a decrease from 46% in 2022 to 38% in 2023. Meanwhile, the Pacific, Middle Atlantic, South Atlantic, and East South Central divisions experienced slight increases, ranging from 1% to 2%.

Discover more from Eye On Housing

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


 In 2022, the total count of second homes was 6.5 million representing 4.6% of the total housing stock, according to NAHB estimates. This reflects a decline from 2020, when the number of second homes stood at 7.15 million.

As of 2022, the state with the largest stock of second homes was Florida (1 million), accounting for 15.3% of all second homes. Wyoming had the smallest stock with approximately 16,320 second homes, . Half of the nation’s second homes can be found in these seven states – Florida, California, New York, Texas, Michigan, North Carolina, Arizona, and Pennsylvania.

In-depth analysis of the county level data shows that the concentration of second homes is not simply restricted to conventional locations like beachfront areas. There were 807 counties spread over 50 states where second homes accounted for at least 10% of the local housing stock. Only Washington D.C. was the exception, reporting a second home share of 1.8%. Across the nation 314 counties, 10% of all counties in the U.S., had at least 20% of housing units that were made up of second homes.

Counties where at least half of their housing stock is second homes were widely spread over in 14 states.  Of these counties, four were in Wisconsin, four in Colorado, two in Michigan, Minnesota, Utah, California, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania, and one county each in Alaska, Idaho, Maryland, Missouri, New Jersey, and New York, These national patterns are mapped below.

Counties with more than 25,000 second homes are mostly located in or near metropolitan areas.  The top 10 counties with the most second homes account for around 11.2% of second home stocks, most of which were in Arizona, Florida, California, Massachusetts, and New York. Of the top 10 counties regarding absolute numbers of second homes, only three counties (Lee County, Florida, Barnstable County, Massachusetts, and Collier County, Florida) had more than 20% of their housing stock in second homes.

In terms of methodology, this analysis focuses on the number and location of second homes that would be qualified for the home mortgage interest deduction by individuals using the Census Bureau’s 2022 American Community Survey (ACS). It does not account for homes held primarily for investment or business purposes.

NAHB estimates are based on the definition used for home mortgage interest deduction: a second home is a non-rental property that is not classified as taxpayer’s principal residence. Examples could be: (1) a home that used to be a primary residence due to a move or a period of simultaneous ownership of two homes due to a move; (2) a home under construction for which the eventual homeowner acts as the builder and obtains a construction loan (Treasury regulations permit up to 24 months of interest deductibility for such construction loans); or (3) a non-rental seasonal or vacation residence. However, homes under construction are not included in this analysis because the ACS does not collect data on units under construction.

Discover more from Eye On Housing

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


A majority of single-family homes started in 2023 continued to have two full bathrooms according to the latest release of the Census Bureau’s Survey of Construction.  According to the latest data, 64.7% of new single-family homes started in 2023 had two full bathrooms, 23.8% had three full bathrooms, 6.9% had 4 or more full bathrooms, and only 4.6% had one full bathroom or less.

The recent data features the largest increase since 2018 in single-family homes with two bathrooms, as the share increased from 62.3% to 64.7%. This reverses the trend of the past two years when this share consecutively decreased. The share of single-family starts with 3 full bathrooms fell for the second straight year, down to 23.8%, while the share of single-family starts with 1 full bathroom or less rose to 4.6%, the third straight increase. Single-family homes started with 4 or more bathrooms share decreased to 6.9%, after increasing the prior two years.

Across the U.S., the New England census division had the highest share at 75.6% of new single-family starts having two full bathrooms. This share jumped by 22.2 percentage points from 2022, and this was the first time since 2017 that the New England share was the largest in the nation. The lowest share census division was the Middle Atlantic, with 50.0% of new single-family starts reporting two full bathrooms. The share of new single-family started with two full bathrooms fell 9.2 percentage points from 2022 in the Middle Atlantic.

Half-Bathrooms

Most new single-family homes started in 2023 have no half-bathrooms at 54.7%. Following closely is the share of new single-family homes with one half-bathroom at 43.8% . New single-family starts with two or more half-bathrooms had a small share of 1.5% in 2023.

Half-bathrooms are historically prevalent in the New England census division as 79.8% of new single-family starts had at least one in 2023. Half-bathrooms were the least common in the West South Central, with only 38.3% of new single-family starts reporting at least one half-bathroom. A trend of note is in the Pacific, where the share has fallen for five consecutive years, from 53.2% in 2018 to 40.7% in 2023.

Discover more from Eye On Housing

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


MetroCreative

New real estate rules for homebuyers and sellers went into effect last weekend.

The rules, which impact the way commissions work, stem from a $418 million settlement between the National Association of Realtors and home sellers earlier this year.

The federal class-action lawsuits claimed that homeowners were being forced to pay artificially inflated real estate commissions when they sold their homes.

The rules boil down to two significant changes.

First, under the new rules, homes listed on a Multiple Listing Service, or MLS, will no longer include a seller’s offer to cover the cost of a buyer’s agent’s services.

“That’s the biggest change for us in Western Pennsylvania. Now, we are not allowed to advertise the buyer’s agent’s commission in the MLS,” said Scott Cavinee, a real estate agent for SWC Realty in Uniontown.

A seller can still allow a commission split, but the agreement cannot be listed on the MLS.

Second, home buyers who want to work with an agent will have to sign an agreement up front that details exactly what commission the buyer will pay the agent – including whether it’s through a commission split with a seller’s agent – before working together or touring homes in person or virtually with their agent.

That’s not entirely new, said Beverly A. Herndon, president of the Washington-Greene Association of Realtors, as about a dozen states already required those written agreements.

“Pennsylvania has had a buyer agency agreement since 1999 – we’ve been doing it for about 25 years – so nothing in regard to that should change,” said Herndon.

Traditionally, an agent for a person selling a home would typically take a 5 or 6% commission on a home sale. It was intended to be shared with the buyer’s agent and was considered a standard, if informal, practice.

Armand Ferrara, a real estate agent with SWC Realty in Belle Vernon, noted commission has always been negotiable.

“Commission has always been negotiable,” he said. “Let’s say I’m going to list your house and I’m going to list for 6% commission, but we want to give the buyer agent a part of that commission, maybe 3%. You might say, ‘I don’t want to give the buyer agent anything and I don’t want to give you 6%. Commission is optional; that’s not new.”

Cavinee said sellers should be aware that buyers can still ask the seller to pay some, or all of the fees of their agent.

“If the only offer coming in is a buyer who asks for the seller to cover “X” percent, the seller will do it if he wants to sell that house,” said Cavinee. “It’s like saying, ‘Will you leave that living room suit?’ It’s part of the negotiations.”

If a seller doesn’t agree to pay the buyer’s agent, the buyer is responsible for it, which can impact first-time and low-income buyers who might not have a lot of cash, Cavinee said.

Herndon said it’s important to have a trusted, licensed agent to navigate the complicated process of purchasing or selling a home, which is often the biggest financial purchase a person will make.

Kim Shindle, vice president of communications for the Pennsylvania Association of Realtors, agreed.

“It’s important for home buyers or those selling their homes to understand the important role Realtors play guiding them through home buying or home selling,” she said. “They lend their knowledge about the local marketplace, where each area is different.”

Herndon said it’s too soon to tell what impact the changes will have, but said ultimately, the purpose is to provide transparency “so the consumer is fully informed as to what is required on both sides.”



This article was originally published by a www.observer-reporter.com . Read the Original article here. .


The share of new homes with patios increased to yet another record high in 2023. Of the roughly 950,000 single-family homes started during the year, 63.7% came with patios. This is up from 63.3% in 2022 and marks the eighth consecutive year the percentage set a new record high. The source for these numbers is NAHB tabulation of data from the Survey of Construction (conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau with partial funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development).

Historically, fewer than half of new homes came with patios during the 2008-2011 period of extreme weakness in housing markets. But soon thereafter, the share jumped to 52.4% in 2012 and has been climbing ever since. The percentage has now increased in thirteen of the past fourteen years. The only exception was 2015, when the percentage was unchanged.

While patios for new homes have generally become more common over time, the parts of the country where they tend to be most common have remained consistent. At the low end, only 17% percent of new single-family homes built in New England and 20% in the Middle Atlantic came with patios in 2023. At the high end, the incidence of patios on new homes was over 80% in the West South Central and close to 70% in the South Atlantic and Mountain divisions. The geographic tendencies are similar to the ones reported in last year’s post.

Additional detail on the characteristics of new-home patios is available from the Annual Builder Practices Survey (BPS) conducted by Home Innovation Research Labs.

For the U.S. as a whole, the 2024 BPS report (based on homes built in 2023, like the SOC-based statistics cited above) shows that the average size of a new-home patio is about 290 square feet, but with considerable geographic variation. The average is over 400 square feet in the East South Central and about 380 square feet in New England; but under 200 square feet in the West South Central, and only a little over 200 square feet in the adjacent West North Central division.

In most parts of the country, poured concrete dominates all other building materials used in new-home patios. In the East South Central, for instance, poured concrete accounts for over 90% of new-home patios on a square-foot basis. To the extent that there are exceptions, they occur on the east coast. In the South Atlantic, concrete and brick pavers each have about a quarter of the market, and poured concrete has less than half. In New England, the market is more or less equally divided among poured concrete, concrete pavers and natural stone. In the Mid-Atlantic, brick pavers are the most popular choice for new-home patios by a substantial margin.

Discover more from Eye On Housing

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


NAHB’s Cost of Housing Index (CHI) highlights the burden that housing costs represent for middle and low-income families. In the second quarter of 2024, the CHI found that a family earning the nation’s median income of $97,800 must spend 38% of its income to cover the mortgage payment on a median-priced new single-family home. Because a typical existing home in the second quarter was more expensive ($422,100) than a typical newly built home ($412,300), the CHI for existing homes was higher, at 39%. 

Low-income families, defined as those earning only 50% of median income, would have to spend 77% of their earnings to pay for a new home and 79% for an existing one.

The latest results reveal that affordability has worsened for existing homes. A typical family needed 39% of its income to pay for a median-priced existing home in the second quarter, up from 36% in the first quarter. A low-income family needed 79% of its income vs. 71% in the previous quarter. In contrast, the CHI and low-income CHI for new homes remained unchanged between the first and second quarters of 2024, at 38% and 77%, respectively.

Additionally, CHI is produced for existing homes in 176 metropolitan areas, breaking down the percentage of a family’s income needed to make a mortgage payment in each area based on the local median existing home price and median income. Percentages are also calculated for low-income families in these markets.

In 14 out of 176 markets in the second quarter, the typical family is severely cost-burdened (must pay more than 50% of their income on a median-priced existing home).  In 89 other markets, such families are cost-burdened (need to pay between 31% and 50%). There are 73 markets where the CHI is 30% of earnings or lower.

The Top Five Severely Cost-Burdened Markets

San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, Calif. was the most severely cost-burdened market on the CHI during the second quarter, where 94% of a typical family’s income is needed to make a mortgage payment on an existing home. This was followed by:

• San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, Calif. (79%)
• San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, Calif. (76%)
• Urban Honolulu, Hawaii (76%)
• Naples-Marco Island, Fla. (74%)

Low-income families would have to pay between 147% and 188% of their income in all five of the above markets to cover a mortgage.

The Top Five Least Cost-Burdened Markets

By contrast, Decatur, Ill., was the least cost-burdened market on the CHI, where families needed to spend just 15% of their income to pay for a mortgage on an existing home. Rounding out the least burdened markets are:

• Cumberland, Md.-W.Va. (17%)
• Springfield, Ill. (18%)
• Elmira, N.Y. (18%)
• Peoria, Ill. (19%)
• Binghamton, N.Y. (tied at 19%)

Low-income families in these markets would have to pay between 30% and 39% of their income to cover the mortgage payment for a median priced existing home.

Visit nahb.org/chi for tables and details.

Discover more from Eye On Housing

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


It’s chaos from the very start when Trenton Miller swings open the wooden doors of a four-bedroom home in McLean, Virginia, a suburb of Washington DC.

Miller, a 19-year-old real-estate agent, takes the viewer on a frantic jog through all three floors of the $3.4 million property.

He plays rock-paper-scissors with himself in the mirror, pretends to have a distressing trip to the toilet, and falls not once, but three times, on the hardwood floor.

Miller calls it a speed tour.

For the recent high-school graduate, it’s become an important calling card as he starts his career in his hometown of Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, a small county seat west of Gettysburg.

In a stagnant real-estate market, Miller, like other agents, has been forced to get creative to make his listings stand out and find potential buyers. Enter the speed tour. Now, other agents have asked Miller to film his run-throughs of their listings, some even paying as much as $1,500 for a single speed tour posted to his account @trent_miller__, which has 1.3 million followers.

“It’s been a blessing,” Miller told Business Insider. “I really want to make sure I capitalize on the opportunity.”

Miller started posting ‘speed tours’ when he was feeling stuck

Miller intended to invest in rental properties, inspired by real-estate entrepreneurs he admired on YouTube like Grant Cardone, but determined the experience he’d gain as a broker was a good place to start.

Early on, Miller realized that a traditional home tour — where a broker calmly narrates a walk-through of a home for sale and points out commonplace details like the height of the ceilings or finishings on a sink — would get lost on TikTok.

It was also difficult to find homebuyers prepared to endure relatively high mortgage interest rates and expensive home prices.

“Business was slow getting started,” Miller told Business Insider. “I was like, ‘Man, I got to do something different.'”

In April, he showed up to a rental listing in Chambersburg with two ideas: a speed tour, where he would run through the house, and a teleporting tour, where he’d pop up in each room.

He filmed both, but posted the speed tour first later that day. When the clip went viral — it has nearly 5 million views as of July 23 — Miller knew he’d struck gold. He never even got to post the teleporting footage.

Now, his running tours routinely rack up millions of views — some as high as 34 million. He even sells T-shirts with his signature catchphrases for $20 apiece. (One is “Most bathrooms have that!” which he says when he points to mirrors above vanities in bathrooms.)

The viral videos are slowly translating into real-world leads. Someone who watched a speed-tour video of a $600,000 home in Annapolis, Maryland, reached out as an interested buyer, Miller said.

The viral fame has opened doors for his real-estate career

Miller tries not to overthink the alchemy of his tours.

He’ll do one walk-through with a cameraman to map out their course, but purposely tries to go in with as little preparation as possible.

“I think people want to see a raw reaction to the home,” he said. “They want to see personality in videos.”

Miller said he doesn’t edit out the times he falls on camera and tries to make as few cuts in the video as possible to preserve the authentically manic energy.

Other agents representing sellers have reached out, asking Miller to run through their listings. He’s traveled to Florida, Virginia, and Maryland over the last three months to film speed tours of homes.

He told Business Insider he’s leaving for a trip soon to film speed tours for a vacation rental agency, showing off their luxury villas.

Miller said the connections he’s been able to make from his viral fame have put him in touch with the very real-estate investors who inspired him to enter the industry.

Recently, he added, he’s been in touch with one of his original heroes: Grant Cardone.





This article was originally published by a www.businessinsider.com . Read the Original article here. .


First, before a seller may show a residential property or a buyer may tour a property, real estate professionals and their clients will be required to enter into a written representation agreement outlining the terms of realtors’ compensation, said Ali Whitley, president of Ohio Realtors.

Written representation agreements must include an expiration date, information on fair housing and blockbusting laws, whether the relationship is exclusive or nonexclusive, and terms of compensation, according to House Bill 466, which was recently approved in addition to the settlement agreement.

ExploreNumber of homes sold, sale prices kept rising in first half of 2024

Stephen Brobeck, a senior fellow with Consumer Federation of America, told this news outlet that the lawsuit and resulting ruling is based on the fact that for the last century, the real estate industry has effectively set commission rates.

“DOJ (the Department of Justice) has been working for 80 years to try to force the industry to create a more price-competitive market … but the real watershed was the jury decision in the combined Sitzer and Moehrl cases,” he said. “A jury found the the industry defendants guilty of price fixing and awarded the Missouri plaintiffs over $5 billion including triple damages.”

For decades, real estate agents have typically been paid a certain percentage of the sales price once the home is sold. A typical agent’s commission has been 6% of the sale price, split between the agents or companies representing the buyer and seller.

Brobeck said in the new system, it is important for people who intend to buy or sell a home to carefully select an agent ahead of time who is both honest and competent. Before deciding on an agent, the buyers and sellers should get a proposed contract document from the agent and have an opportunity to read and understand it. He said the agent should be willing to discuss the contract before the buyer or seller selects them.

“If an agent will not present a readable contract that is consumer-centric, a consumer should look for another agent,” Brobeck said. “And it’s that refusal by consumers to work with agents presenting unreadable contracts that will persuade the industry to improve them.”

Second change: Compensation

Real estate professionals will be prohibited from offering cooperative compensation on listings on multiple listing service (MLS) databases, Whitley said. That includes all listing types that appear on the MLS, including residential, commercial and rentals.

“What that means is that if the buyer’s broker is authorized by the buyer to accept commission compensation from a different party than the buyer, then they’ll need to just get that communication directly from the listing agent or the seller,” Whitley said. “What a buyer should expect moving forward is that we have a written representation agreement that will delineate what the services of their broker or agent is to them, and the fee for those services. So prior to showing any homes or to touring any homes, they will have a written representation agreement with their agent.”

Buyers and sellers can still negotiate compensation arrangements directly with real estate professionals outside of the MLS. Additionally, sellers may continue to offer buyer concessions, such as closing cost contributions on the MLS.

Whitley said the changes are meant to be transparent and provide clarity to both the sellers and buyers in the transaction.

“Instead of there being a perceived situation of a listing broker determining what will happen moving forward with a buyer’s broker, it will be very clear that it is the seller and the agent are having a conversation and determining that the seller is or is not willing to offer cooperative compensation,” she said. “And if they are willing to offer cooperative compensation, what is that amount that they are wiling to offer.”

ExploreOwners of Pet Wants business plan to open downtown Miamisburg storefront

On the buyer’s side “it’s clarifying that the buyer’s agent provides services to the buyer … and they advocate on behalf of the buyer,” Whitley said. “And so the written representation agreement will delineate what those services are, and then also what the fee is that that broker is charging for those services. And then the buyer and the buyer’s broker will be able to negotiate from there what that commission is that will be paid and how it will be paid.”

Whitley said the compensation obligation can be satisfied through the purchase agreement, if the seller is willing to offer it.

“It also can be negotiated between buyer and seller during the time of a purchase agreement, or the buyer could say ‘I prefer to pay my own agent because they are working on my behalf … or any combination of those things can happen,” she said.

Kelly McCormick, president of Dayton Realtors, said commissions were “always negotiable.”

“Now, creating that clarity between buyers and sellers is something that the real estate industry and agents will be doing every single day,” McCormick said. “There’s always going to be a cost to sell and a cost to buy. Those costs are always provided, as far as a lender of good faith estimate, and now both buyer and seller will have potentially more clarity in how that cost impacts their purchase and their sale.”

ExploreBig Lots to close 315 stores, including sites in Montgomery, Butler counties

Austin Castro, a team leader at Coldwell Banker Heritage, said part of the impact from the changes could come as a result of people signing agreements with buyers agents up front, as opposed to down the road.

“What I think that means is when someone wants to sell their house, there was always a big interview process?” he said. “They’d call three or four different agents. They’d sit down and interview them. They’d talk about it, you know, and then they sign an agreement to sell their house with whoever they thought was best fit for the job. I think we’re going to start to see that now with with buyer’s representation.”

Castro said buyers, when choosing an agent, used to go with the first person they met, someone they met at an open house or a friend of a friend.

“Now I think it’s going to be a little bit more of a interview process for buyers representation because people are signing those agreements up front, disclosing ‘Hey, this is what my agent makes on this transaction,’ so I think that’s probably where we’re going to see a biggest change is going to be maybe buyers putting a little more thought on who they’re going to have represent them,” Castro said.

ExploreFuyao raid: Who owns raided properties and what neighbors have seen





This article was originally published by a www.daytondailynews.com . Read the Original article here. .


It was huge news at the time: the National Association of Realtors (NAR) agreed in March to pay $418 million and make changes to how the home-buying process works in order to settle a class-action lawsuit that alleged the industry conspired to make agent commissions higher than they needed to be.

The provisions of the settlement go into effect on Aug. 17. For now, what consumers can expect is more paperwork, and potentially more confusion. 

“This is a grand social experiment,” says Leo Pareja, the CEO of exp Realty, one of the biggest real-estate brokerages in the country. “None of us know what’s about to happen.” 

Buyers now have to sign a contract

Here’s how the process used to work: a seller’s agent would list a home on an MLS, or multiple listing service, which is a database of properties for sale. Those listings would state that the seller of a home would pay a certain amount to compensate the buyer’s agent. This compensation was often about 3% of the sales price, which was also about what the seller’s agent would get from the seller. (The average amount ranges between jurisdictions and even from sale to sale; some agents were also paid flat fees.) 

Technically, those fees were negotiable. But most homeowners either didn’t know that or feel they could negotiate. In addition, home sellers allege, real-estate agents would sometimes “steer” buyers to specific homes based on the amount of compensation they could receive. As of Aug. 17, real-estate agents cannot list any sort of agent compensation when they put a house on multiple listing services, a change designed to eliminate steering.

Read More: Stop Looking For Your Forever Home.

In addition, both buyers and sellers are now required to sign a written agreement with their agent before the agent shows them a property or assists with a transaction. The buyer’s side of this is more consequential—most sellers have signed these contracts in the past, but few buyers did. In the new buyers’ contract, sometimes called an “exclusive representation agreement,” the buyer agrees to work with the agent for a certain period of time. Most importantly, the buyer and agent also agree on how the agent will be compensated, whether through a flat fee, a specific share of the purchase price, or another method. Agents must also make clear in this contract that broker commissions are fully negotiable, a change that consumer advocates hope will drive commissions—and prices—down.

Many real-estate agents say the changes are positive, including Jennifer Stevenson, a real-estate agent in upstate New York and a regional vice president for the National Association of Realtors. “This makes the process better,” she says. “Clients are going to understand exactly what is expected of me and what I am offering them as a service.”

But others aren’t so sure that the changes will be positive for consumers. Realtor associations across the country have been releasing drafts of contracts that are extremely lengthy and written in legal terms that are difficult to understand, says Tanya Monestier, a law professor at the University of Buffalo. The draft buyer agreement from the North Carolina Association of Realtors, for instance, is seven pages long.

Read More: When Should I Buy A House?

Monestier analyzed the draft agreement by the California Association of Realtors (CAR) for the Consumer Federation of America, and issued a report criticizing the agreement for being opaque—so opaque, in fact, that Monestier says she had trouble getting through the document. “No seller will read this monster of a document—much less be able to understand it,” she concluded. 

Not all new buyer forms are so dense. Monestier says she reviewed a few forms that were clear; those from Exp Realty, for instance, are just two pages long and explicitly spell out buyer and seller responsibilities. Exp has made these forms available to any company that wants to use them, says Pareja, the CEO. 

Compensation may be changing

Before the NAR settlement, it was standard for the seller to pay for both the seller and the buyer’s agents. That may not be the case going forward.

In tight housing markets, sellers could refuse to pay for the buyer’s agent because they have so much interest in their home. Instead, agent’s fees may become a bigger part of the negotiation when people are buying homes. If a buyer really wants a house, for instance, they could offer to pay the seller’s agent fees, and include that provision in their offer letter. Conversely, if a seller in a slow market is desperate to unload their home, they could offer to pay the buyer’s agent fees—though the agent could not disclose that on the listing. 

Monestier says she also expects there will be more buyers who choose not to have an agent at all, because they don’t want to be on the hook for the agent’s fee. That could lead to less potential work for many of the real-estate agents out there.

Most of all, the settlement could lower compensation for both buyer’s and seller’s agents. Academic papers have predicted that fees could decline by 30-50% as a result, which would end up lowering home prices as well.

Of course, it’s possible that old habits are hard to break, and that not much will change at all. Sellers are accustomed to paying for buyers’ broker fees, and they may continue to do so. Even if everyone involved knows they can negotiate. 



This article was originally published by a time.com . Read the Original article here. .

Pin It