Tag

Holds

Browsing


The Federal Reserve maintained the federal funds rate at a target range of 3.75% to 4% at the conclusion of its October policy meeting. Approved by a 10–2 vote, the decision followed September’s quarter-point increase. Federal Open Market Committee members Lisa Cook and Beth Hammack dissented, supporting another 25-basis-point increase for October.

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) upgraded its assessment of economic growth, describing activity as expanding at a “strong pace,” compared with a “solid pace” in September. This change suggests greater confidence in the economy’s momentum despite elevated uncertainty. The committee also cited resilient domestic spending. Geopolitical developments remain a source of uncertainty, although Chairman Warsh was positive about the economic outlook at his press conference.

The Fed also emphasized that “Productivity growth is strong, and capital investment is robust.” This productivity assessment is a possible favorable signal for the inflation outlook. Greater output per worker, via tech investment, can help contain labor costs, allowing the economy to grow without an increase in price pressures. Stronger growth alone therefore does not necessarily imply a need for tighter monetary policy, particularly if investment is expanding the economy’s productive capacity.

On inflation, the committee maintained its assessment that price pressures remain elevated. The committee noted that it wanted to see an accumulation of more information before determining the appropriate policy stance to ensure a timely return of inflation to its two percent goal. This emphasis on additional data leaves the possibility of additional rate hikes in the future (NAHB is forecasting an increase in December), while also allowing the Fed to avoid raising rates immediately before the November election. September’s economic projections from the Fed pointed to an additional quarter-point increase before year-end.

Today’s statement reiterated that “The Committee will deliver price stability.” The two dissents demonstrate that some FOMC voting members already see sufficient justification for another increase. For the majority, however, holding rates steady provides more time to evaluate inflation and the effects of September’s action. Separately, one could argue that tighter monetary policy from the Fed at this moment can do little to address a major source of recent inflation pressure: the Iran war.

The policy challenge remains distinguishing temporary price increases from persistent inflation. September’s consumer price index (CPI) rose 3.7% from a year earlier, up from 3.4% in August, while core CPI, excluding food and energy, increased 2.6%, up from 2.4%. Gasoline accounted for more than half of the monthly headline increase, underscoring the importance of energy costs and geopolitical factors, although the rise in core inflation indicates that price pressures extend beyond energy.

For housing, today’s hold on monetary policy avoids another increase in the policy rate that influences builder acquisition, development, and construction lending costs. However, financing conditions remain restrictive for projects already facing high development and construction expenses.

Mortgage rates depend more directly on longer-term bond yields and mortgage market conditions. The 10-year Treasury yield stood at approximately 5%, down from more than 5.3% earlier this month. That decline provided some relief for housing demand, although long-term borrowing costs remain elevated.

Demand for capital associated with data center and AI investment, concerns over federal budget constraints, and oil supply risks and diesel price pressures related to the Iran war remain important considerations for the rate outlook.

Overall, the October meeting combines a stronger assessment of economic growth with a decision to wait on additional inflation data. Possible productivity gains provide a potential path toward continued expansion with lower inflation, but the Fed is seeking more evidence that price stability is on the horizon. For housing, the key question remains whether price pressures can ease without another increase in borrowing costs.

Chairman Warsh also announced that in 2027, the Fed will hold seven policy-setting meetings and one strategy meeting. In 2028, there will be six policy meetings and two strategy sessions.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


The median age of construction workers is 42, one year older than a typical worker in the national labor force, according to NAHB analysis of the latest 2024 American Community Survey (ACS) data. At the same time, younger workers are becoming a growing part of the construction workforce. Despite some improvements since the peak of the skilled labor shortage in 2021, attracting and retaining skilled labor remains the primary long-term goal for the construction industry.

The median age of construction industry workers varies across states. The color coding in the map above tracks the median age of people working in the construction industry.  The state with the oldest median age (47 years old) is Rhode Island, followed by Connecticut, Illinois, New Hampshire and New Jersey, where the median age of construction workers is 44. Construction workers are younger on average in the central part of the nation. For example, half of all construction workers in Utah and Idaho are under 39.

The second data series mapped above is the difference between the median age of construction workers in each state and the median age of all industries. These estimates are reported as the numbers printed on each state. A positive number indicates that on average, construction workers are older than a typical worker in the state labor force. Rhode Island is the state where the median age of construction workers is 7 years higher than the overall median. On the other hand, a negative number indicates construction workers are, in general, younger than the state labor force.  In Vermont, the median age of construction workers is 4 years younger than the overall median.

Generational shifts are reshaping the construction labor force. The share of Gen Z in construction workforce has grown rapidly, increasing from 6.4% in 2019 to 16.8% in 2024. This considerable increase over five years reflects a growing pipeline of younger workers. The Millennial generation share also rose from 35.7% to 37.5% over the same period. In contrast, the Gen X share declined from 36.6% to 32.5%, while the Baby Boomer’s share fell sharply from 20.6% to 12.8% as more retired. This shift suggests that Gen Z and Millennial workers are becoming an increasingly important part of the construction workforce. 

Compared with the workforce across all industries, construction has a relatively smaller share of younger workers, but a larger proportion of workers in their prime-working age. In 2024, only about 10.7% of construction workers were under age 25, compared with 13.7% of workers across all industries. Around 67.3% of the construction workforce were in the prime working years of 25-54, compared to 63.4% in the overall workforce.

Construction workers were especially concentrated in the 35 to 54 age group. Workers ages 35 to 44 accounted for 24.5% of the construction workforce, compared with 22.1% of workers across all industries; meanwhile, workers ages 45 to 54 represented 21.2% of construction workers, compared with 19.3% overall. At the same time, workers 55 and older made up 22% of the construction workforce. As these older workers approach retirement, attracting more skilled labor remains the primary long-term goal for the construction industry.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


The Federal Reserve held the federal funds rate at a target range of 3.5% to 3.75% at the conclusion of its July policy meeting. There were three dissenting votes on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), all of which supported raising the federal funds rate by 25 basis points. The July monetary policy hold marked the fifth consecutive hold, following 75 basis points of cuts at the end of 2025.

The central bank noted that “economic activity is expanding at a solid pace despite elevated uncertainty.” The Fed also stated that this uncertainty is due in part to the conflict in the Middle East. Additionally, Chairman Warsh noted at his press conference that the economy has shown “impressive resilience” in the face of these headline risks.

In a theme likely to receive growing attention in the quarters ahead, the Fed noted that productivity growth and capital investment are strong. Productivity growth, in particular, suggests future deflationary forces. The Fed also noted that the unemployment rate has experienced little change in recent data.

With respect to inflation, the Fed stated that “inflation remains elevated” relative to the central bank’s two percent target. Importantly, the Fed attributed these inflation challenges to “supply shocks,” including the energy sector.

If you squint a little, this can be seen as a dovish policy message because, while the Fed can affect aggregate demand by tightening monetary policy (as the bond market appears to expect), the central bank cannot effectively address supply shocks with policy. While this should not be interpreted as taking rate hikes off the table, it is an accurate statement of current macroeconomic conditions and many analysts’ views that the Fed cannot solve energy price increases due to war or one-off tariff effects with monetary policy. The same can be said about the impact of the housing deficit on the shelter component of overall inflation, which can only be addressed by other policies that bend the cost curve for housing supply.

From a policy perspective, the Fed noted very clearly, “The Committee will deliver price stability.” The Fed also explicitly emphasized the FOMC’s two percent inflation goal. Chairman Warsh reiterated this two percent goal clearly in his press conference. Moreover, the Fed Chairman noted that nominal long-term interest rates had moved higher since the last meeting, which he attributed to economic data rather than Fed forward guidance.

Indeed, the two-year Treasury rate is now 50 basis points higher than the top target rate for the federal funds rate, indicating that the bond market is expecting Fed tightening. However, one could also argue, as Chairman Warsh appeared to do so at his press conference, that the market has responded to the Fed’s current stance and goals and is delivering an environment in which market forces do the work of tighter policy. Chairman Warsh even suggested that despite the “no change” policy for the July meeting, other changes in market conditions indicate that the July meeting did not result in a policy “pause.”

There were important items not discussed in today’s statement, although they were referenced in today’s press conference. Chairman Warsh has established several task forces looking at Fed communications, forward guidance, data measurement (including how inflation is measured, a topic discussed at the Chairman’s press conference, suggesting new, preferred measures are coming), and other policy-related topics. We will learn more about those efforts down the road.

The Fed will also likely address the status of the central bank’s balance sheet, which can affect long-term interest rates, including mortgage rates, if balance sheet reduction were to be accelerated. These long-term rate changes, set by markets, are in the driver’s seat in the meantime.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


Consumer loan delinquency rates continued to normalize in the first quarter of 2026 as pandemic-related disruptions diminished and credit conditions moved closer to historical norms.  According to the latest Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, about 4.8% of outstanding household debt balances were in some stage of delinquency, unchanged from the previous quarter but above the unusually low levels observed during the pandemic period.

The composition of delinquent balances also points to increasing persistence of financial stress among borrowers. Loans categorized as severely derogatory—which are delinquent balances with reports of repossession, charge-off to bad debt, or foreclosure—increased of 0.3 percentage points in the first quarter of 2026 compared to the previous quarter to 1.8%. Likewise, balances that were 120 or more days delinquent have steadily trended upward since 2022 as more borrowers who fall behind are remaining delinquent for longer periods rather than catching up on missed payments.

Looking at seriously delinquent loans, defined as balances 90 or more days past due, conditions continue to diverge across loan types. Credit cards remain the top area of concern. Approximately 13.1% of credit card balances were seriously delinquent in the first quarter of 2026, increasing 0.4 percentage points from the previous quarter and quickly approaching levels last seen following the Great Recession. The sustained rise in seriously delinquent credit card balances since mid-2022 suggests many households increasingly relied on revolving debt to manage higher everyday living costs during the inflation surge and are now struggling to keep up with repayment.

Student loan balances that were seriously delinquent also continued rising following the resumption of collections and credit reporting after the payment pause. About 10.3% of student loan balances were 90+ days delinquent in the first quarter, up from 9.6% at the end of 2025. Furthermore, roughly 1 million federal student loan borrowers entered default in the last quarter of 2025, followed by another 2.6 million borrowers in the first quarter of 2026, as missed payments began progressing through the federal default timeline. The study also noted that the student loan borrowers entering default were likely to be delinquent on other forms of debt, and the financial strain could intensify as collection efforts resume.

Auto loan performance also continued deteriorating in the first quarter. The share of auto loan balances that were seriously delinquent rose to 5.6%, the highest level since 2003. Elevated vehicle prices and financing costs which rose during the pandemic and have remained sticky, continue to pressure many borrowers, particularly those with lower credit quality.

Mortgage debt, by contrast, remains comparatively healthy despite inching up in recent years. About 1.1% of mortgage balances were seriously delinquent, remaining low by historical standards. Strong homeowner equity positions and historically low fixed-rate mortgages continue supporting mortgage credit performance even as broader consumer credit conditions weaken.

Overall, household balance sheets show growing financial strain especially within non-housing consumer debt categories, with gradual and persistent deterioration in credit card, student loan, and auto loan performance.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


Overall confidence in the market for new multifamily housing held steady year-over-year in the first quarter, according to the Multifamily Market Survey (MMS) by the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB). The MMS produces two separate indices. The Multifamily Production Index (MPI) had a reading of 44, unchanged year-over-year, while the Multifamily Occupancy Index (MOI) had a reading of 69, dropping 13 points year-over-year.

Multifamily developer sentiment is roughly where it was at this time last year, although the combination of regulatory hurdles, interest rates, insurance costs and volatility in material prices is threatening the viability of some projects. Also, in some markets, developers are reporting that it has become more difficult to obtain permits for unsubsidized projects.

The MPI and MOI continue to show that the market for garden and low-rise apartments typical of outlying areas is stronger than the market for mid- and high-rise apartments. The gap is narrowing year-over-year for new multifamily construction (i.e., blue line), while widening for the occupancy of existing apartments (i.e., orange line). NAHB is projecting that multifamily starts will increase slightly in 2026, but current production rates are unlikely to be sustained through 2027.

Multifamily Production Index (MPI)

The MMS asks multifamily developers to rate the current conditions as “good”, “fair”, or “poor” for multifamily starts in markets where they are active. The index and all its components are scaled so that a number above 50 indicates that more respondents report conditions as good rather than poor. The MPI is a weighted average of four key market segments: three in the built-for-rent market (garden/low-rise, mid/high-rise, and subsidized) and the built-for-sale (or condominium) market.

There were two components which experienced increases year-over-year, while the other two experienced decreases during the first quarter. The component measuring mid/high-rise rose seven points to 35, while the component measuring subsidized units increased six points to 56. On the other hand, the component measuring garden/low-rise fell six points to 48 while the component measuring built-for-sale units inched down one point to 37. Only the component measuring subsidized units was above the break-even point of 50.

Multifamily Occupancy Index (MOI)

The survey also asks multifamily property owners to rate the current conditions for occupancy of existing rental apartments in markets where they are active as “good”, “fair”, or “poor”.  Like the MPI, the MOI and all its components are scaled so that a number above 50 indicates more respondents report that occupancy is good than poor. The MOI is a weighted average of three built-for-rent market segments (garden/low-rise, mid/high-rise, and subsidized). 

All three MOI components experienced year-over-year decreases in the first quarter of 2026; the mid/high-rise component dropped 17 points to 59, the garden/low-rise component fell 11 points to 71, and the subsidized component decreased nine points to 80. Nevertheless, all three MOI components remain well above the break-even point of 50.

For more recent information about the market, the survey contains a separate question asking multifamily developers to compare current market conditions to conditions three months earlier. In the first quarter of 2026, 21% of respondents said the current market is better, and 19% said it is worse. However, the majority of developers—60%—said that the market is currently about the same as it was three months ago.

The MMS was re-designed in 2023 to produce results that are easier to interpret and consistent with the proven format of other NAHB industry sentiment surveys. Until there is enough data to seasonally adjust the series, changes in the MMS indices should only be evaluated on a year-over-year basis.

Please visit NAHB’s MMS web page for the full report.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


Private fixed investment in student dormitories edged up 0.1% in the first quarter of 2026, holding at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of $3.9 billion. This modest gain marked a third consecutive quarterly increase, despite continued pressures from elevated interest rates. However, on a year-over-year basis, investments in dorms remained almost unchanged.

Private fixed investment in student housing experienced a surge after the Great Recession, as college enrollment increased from 17.2 million in 2006 to 20.4 million in 2011. However, during the pandemic, private fixed investment in student housing declined drastically from $4.4 billion (SAAR) in the last quarter of 2019 to $3 billion in the second quarter of 2021. According to the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center, college enrollment fell by 3.6% in the fall of 2020 and by 3.1% in the fall of 2021.

Since then, private fixed investment in dorms has rebounded, as college enrollments show a gradual recovery from pandemic-driven declines. Effective in-person learning requires college students to return to campuses, boosting the student housing sector. Still, demographic trends are reshaping the outlook for student housing. The U.S. faces slower growth in the college-age population as birth rates declined following the Great Recession. As a result, total enrollment in postsecondary institutions is projected to only increase 8% from 2020 to 2030, according to the National Center for Education Statistics, well below the 37% increase between 2000 and 2010.

Despite recent fluctuations, student housing construction shows signs of recovery, and future growth is expected in response to increasing student enrollment projections.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .

Pin It