Tag

Highlights

Browsing


A rich, peer-reviewed academic literature finds that homeownership produces benefits that extend well beyond house-price appreciation. As detailed in a 2003 Journal of Urban Economics literature review, research across economics, political science, sociology, medical research, and related fields identifies homeownership as both a wealth-building mechanism and a source of broader household and community stability. Homeownership encourages saving through down payment accumulation and mortgage amortization, creates housing equity that can support retirement or buffer financial shocks, and protects households from rising rents. The literature also links homeownership with stronger employment outcomes, improved physical and mental health, greater family stability, and better educational outcomes for children.

The benefits of homeownership also extend beyond individual households. Because homeowners have a financial stake in their properties and tend to have longer-term ties to their neighborhoods, homeownership is associated with greater property maintenance, higher participation in civic and volunteer organizations, and lower exposure to crime. The literature further finds that neighborhood homeownership rates can generate spillover benefits, strengthening local organizations and supporting surrounding property values. Taken together, this research suggests that policies promoting sustainable homeownership can improve both household opportunity and community well-being.

Housing is unique among major household purchases because it combines the consumption of shelter with ownership of a long-lived asset. Moreover, homeownership matters for most American households. Prior NAHB research using the National Longitudinal Study of Youth estimated a lifetime homeownership rate (the share of adults who have a period of homeownership during their lifetime) of 90.5% for households observed from 1980 through 2016. Among households that became homeowners after 1992, 88% remained owners eight years later.

Research identifying the benefits of homeownership continues. Recent peer-reviewed studies have highlighted the impact of homeownership on wealth, child outcomes, seniors’ status, and community participation.

Homeownership and wealth

Recent academic work continues to identify homeownership as a primary mechanism for middle-class wealth accumulation. For example, Goodman and Mayer (2018) found favorable returns to ownership across multiple locations, even after accounting for the Great Recession. Ownership also provides a form of housing-cost protection: a mortgage-free home in retirement hedges against increases in the cost of housing services. Home equity can further serve as a financial buffer, particularly later in life.

The 2025 Survey of Consumer Finances confirms the basic thesis. The wealth of the median homeowner in 2025 was $458,900, up from $433,600 in 2022. The wealth of the median renter in 2025 was $10,600, down from $11,400 in 2022. The magnitude of the difference, a factor or more than 43, is striking and reflects both impacts and opportunities with respect to homeownership.

Homeownership benefits for children

A substantial literature links parental homeownership with stronger educational and economic outcomes for children. Cooper and Luengo-Prado (2015) found that a 1% increase in home prices when a child was age 17 was associated with 0.9% higher annual income for the children of homeowners. Research also reports higher rates of post-secondary enrollment and attendance. Other work suggests that residential stability, household resources, and neighborhood conditions are important channels, and that results should be interpreted carefully because family characteristics also influence both tenure choice and child outcomes.

Housing equity and retirement security

Studies generally associate homeownership with lower stress and better social, mental, and physical health. Loibl et al. (2021) found that each $10,000 of borrowing capacity against home equity was associated with a 2.2 percentage-point reduction in food insecurity among older adults. Rahman (2026) reported lower odds of several chronic conditions among homeowners, along with improved access to care and greater use of preventive services, after accounting for socioeconomic characteristics. These findings point to housing stability and equity as potential resources during periods of financial or health stress.

Community participation is one of the most consistent social findings

Homeowners tend to participate more in civic and social organizations than renters, generating potential benefits for the communities in which they live. Reviews by Dietz and Haurin (2003) and Haurin (2012) identify higher participation in voting, volunteer organizations, and neighborhood activities. The strongest and most consistent effect is voting. McCabe (2013) emphasized that residential stability is an important mechanism: long-term renters exhibit similar patterns of engagement, indicating that stability, rather than ownership alone, explains part of the relationship.

Labor-market evidence does not support a simple mobility impact

Earlier research raised concerns that homeownership could increase unemployment by making workers less geographically mobile. More recent microeconomic evidence is less supportive of that claim. Green and Wang (2015) found no statistically significant adverse effect of tenure status on employment growth, unemployment risk, or jobless duration. Their results instead associated homeownership with higher wage growth, longer employment duration, and a greater likelihood of interstate moves. Reuschke (2016) also found that mortgage-free ownership was associated with home-based self-employment, suggesting a potential role for housing in small-business formation.

Conclusion

The expanding research literature supports a broad view of homeownership. The value of homeownership is not limited to house-price appreciation. Ownership can combine forced saving, equity accumulation, residential stability, and a durable stake in a neighborhood. These channels are associated with improved outcomes for households and communities. At the same time, many studies identify correlations more readily than causal effects, with affordability, mortgage sustainability, housing quality, and neighborhood conditions helping to determine the benefits of homeownership. Policies that expand sustainable access to homeownership, increase housing supply, and preserve responsible financing can therefore support both household opportunity and community well-being.

Selected research

• Cooper, D. and Luengo-Prado, M.J. (2015), Journal of Urban Economics 86: 54–72.

• Dietz, R.D. and Haurin, D.R. (2003), Journal of Urban Economics 54: 401–450.

• Goodman, L. and Mayer, C. (2018), Journal of Economic Perspectives 32(1): 31–58.

• Green, R. and Wang, B. (2015), USC Lusk Center Working Paper 9474.

• Haurin, D. R. (2012), International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home: 411–416.

• Loibl, C. et al. (2021), Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 44(2): 549–574.

• Rahman, S. (2026), American Journal of Public Health 116(1): 137–147.

• Reuschke, D. (2016), Economic Geography 92(4): 378-400.

This post was co-authored by Alexander Gandhi and Reid Gandhi during the Spring of 2026.

This post draws upon a comprehensive, academic literature review “The Impacts of Homeownership: A Review of the Literature During the Housing Deficit Era,” which is now forthcoming with Alexander Gandhi and Reid Gandhi in an updated edition of the Encyclopedia of Housing and Home.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


The long-delayed September jobs report revealed that the U.S. economy added 119,000 jobs while the unemployment rate climbed to its highest level in nearly four years. Combined with downward revisions to previous months, this month’s data indicates a slowing of the U.S. labor market, though one that is still expanding. With the October jobs report cancelled due to the government shutdown and November’s report not scheduled for release until December 16, this September report now stands as the Federal Reserve’s final look at labor market conditions before its December meeting.

In September, wages grew at a 3.8% pace year over year, matching August’s increase. Wage growth has been outpacing inflation for nearly two years, which typically occurs as productivity increases.

National Employment

The September jobs report was delayed by more than six weeks due to the federal government shutdown. According to the long-awaited Employment Situation Summary reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 119,000 in September, following a downwardly revised loss of 4,000 jobs in August. August’s growth was revised down by 26,000, from an initial estimate of +22,000 to -4,000, marking the second month of negative job growth since January 2010. July’s job growth was revised down by 7,000, from +79,000 to +72,000. Combined, the revisions erased 33,000 jobs from previously reported figures.

Through September, monthly job growth in 2025 has averaged 76,000, a significant slowdown compared to the 168,000 monthly average gain for 2024.

The unemployment rate rose to 4.4% in September, its highest level in nearly four years. The number of persons unemployed rose by 219,000 and the number of persons employed increased by 251,000.

Meanwhile, the labor force participation rate—the proportion of the population either looking for a job or already holding a job—edged up by 0.1 percentage points to 62.4%. This remains below its pre-pandemic level of 63.3% recorded at the beginning of 2020. Among prime working-age individuals (aged 25 to 54), the participation rate remained steady at 83.7%, the highest level since October 2024.

In September, employment gains were seen in health care (+43,000), food services and drinking places (+37,000), and social assistance (+14,000), while the transportation and warehousing sector and the federal government experienced job losses. Federal government employment fell by 3,000 positions in September and has now shed a total of 97,000 positions since peaking in January 2025. The BLS notes that “employees on paid leave or receiving ongoing severance pay are counted as employed in the establishment survey.”

Construction Employment

Employment in the overall construction sector increased by 19,000 in September, after three consecutive months of job losses. Within the industry, residential construction added 3,100 jobs, while non-residential construction gained 16,300 positions.

Residential construction employment now stands at 3.3 million in September, including 954,000 workers employed by builders and remodelers and 2.4 million residential specialty trade contractors.

The six-month moving average of job gains for residential construction remains negative at -3,767 per month, reflecting losses in four of the past six months for May through August 2025. Over the last 12 months, residential construction has seen a net loss of 44,900 jobs, marking the fifth consecutive annual decline since September 2020. Since the low point following the Great Recession, residential construction has gained 1,340,000 positions.

In September, the unemployment rate for construction workers jumped to 5.1% on a seasonally adjusted basis. The unemployment rate for construction workers has remained at a relatively lower level, after reaching 15.3% in April 2020 due to the housing demand impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .



Curatio space by Thomas Haarmann. Photo by Anne-Emmanuelle Thion

Surrealism on Display

Exhibitors at the event aced the surrealist theme with lots of enchanting designs.

“The guiding principle for this show is an utterly wild and colorful theme that encourages us to break the rules,” said interior architect Harmonie Henrio during a Formae/Archistorm discussion. “It makes me think of the mood of Poor Things with Emma Stone and also the images created using [AI design tool] Midjourney. You see a mix and match of objects and environments, as Thomas Haarmann did by bringing together different artists, materials, scales and eras in his Curatio space (pictured) and making them interact, which also invites us to free ourselves from established conventions.”



This article was originally published by a www.houzz.com . Read the Original article here. .


We’re excited to introduce a new way for you to stay informed about the latest trends in housing and construction economics: our Eye on Housing Highlights video series!

For each edition, we will highlight top research topics including construction statistics, housing affordability, policy research, NAHB surveys, macroeconomics, financial indicators and more.

You can find these videos on eyeonhousing.org in the menu under Highlights—be sure to save the url: eyeonhousing.org/highlights—and check back to see the latest videos.

You can also be reminded by subscribing to our Eye on the Economy Newsletter that shares bi-weekly updates from NAHB’s chief economist on housing and economic activity.

Please note that you won’t receive further emails like this one—this is a one-time announcement of our new series.

Discover more from Eye On Housing

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .

Pin It